What's new

Different shades of PTI عمران خان وزیراعظم بننے سے پہلے اور اسد عمر وزیر خزانہ بننے کے بعد۔

Men in Green

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 2, 2014
Messages
1,413
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Last edited:
.
i think nonpolitical military takeover is only solution left for Pakistan unlike previous military takeovers when musharaf and gen zia gave politicians a chance and started doing politics and participated in elections.I wish next coas will implement this
 
. .
.
For a reason

images (5).jpeg
 
.
.
ARE YOU FKING BLIND I POSTED IT BCZ OF VIDEO ONLY TO SHOW U TURNS OF IMRAN AND PTI

ARE YOU FKING RETARD? This is how you post a video:


And this is how you post a twitter comment.


see the difference? or is it not understandable enough. Fktard you clearly linked a tweet. Hope you are educated enough to know what she is suggesting through her tweet. If you don't share the same point of view then WHY THE FK LINK THE TWEET YOU FKTARD.
 
.
Okay everybody. PM IK has failed. Time for 333 brigade to take over. Let's have a repeat of 1999. Then the COAS turned President can hand over Karachi to Altaf bhai, Punjab to Shebaz, Peshawar to a alliance of mullahs. Everybody then can enjoy ten years of retardation.

i think nonpolitical military takeover is only solution left for Pakistan unlike previous military takeovers when musharaf and gen zia gave politicians a chance and started doing politics and participated in elections.I wish next coas will implement this
A military is a organization commited to and trained for war fighting. Politics is about the art of dealing, whealing, compromising to get 100s of differant vistas working together to run society. The moment a military leaves barracks and takes over running a country it becomes a political-military. So what your asking is not possible. You can't swim in the sea without getting wet.

And if you do run a country like Pakistan by treating the entir country as a huge barracks it would lead to break up of the country as the fissiperous forces in the country would have not outlet and would just build up pressure until one day they explode. Think Bangla 1971.
 
.
Okay everybody. PM IK has failed. Time for 333 brigade to take over. Let's have a repeat of 1999. Then the COAS turned President can hand over Karachi to Altaf bhai, Punjab to Shebaz, Peshawar to a alliance of mullahs. Everybody then can enjoy ten years of retardation.



A military is a organization commited to and trained for war fighting. Politics is about the art of dealing, whealing, compromising to get 100s of differant vistas working together to run society. The moment a military leaves barracks and takes over running a country it becomes a political-military. So what your asking is not possible. You can't swim in the sea without getting wet.

And if you do run a country like Pakistan by treating the entir country as a huge barracks it would lead to break up of the country as the fissiperous forces in the country would have not outlet and would just build up pressure until one day they explode. Think Bangla 1971.
We should tell our public that military takeover will cut cost of running political govt as military will not need extra pay to run govt and decisions can be made quickly which will benefit ordinary public life and will make economy strong
 
.
.
Okay everybody. PM IK has failed. Time for 333 brigade to take over. Let's have a repeat of 1999. Then the COAS turned President can hand over Karachi to Altaf bhai, Punjab to Shebaz, Peshawar to a alliance of mullahs. Everybody then can enjoy ten years of retardation.

A military is a organization commited to and trained for war fighting. Politics is about the art of dealing, whealing, compromising to get 100s of differant vistas working together to run society. The moment a military leaves barracks and takes over running a country it becomes a political-military. So what your asking is not possible. You can't swim in the sea without getting wet.

And if you do run a country like Pakistan by treating the entir country as a huge barracks it would lead to break up of the country as the fissiperous forces in the country would have not outlet and would just build up pressure until one day they explode. Think Bangla 1971.
Inflation vs loans
Long term vs short term

Running a campaign to win elections is very different than running a government. Need I say more?
It hurts in the short run but the direction of weaning off loans will help us greatly in the long run
 
.
ARE YOU FKING RETARD? This is how you post a video:


And this is how you post a twitter comment.


see the difference? or is it not understandable enough. Fktard you clearly linked a tweet. Hope you are educated enough to know what she is suggesting through her tweet. If you don't share the same point of view then WHY THE FK LINK THE TWEET YOU FKTARD.
:blah::blah::enjoy:
 
.
Inflation vs loans
Long term vs short term


It hurts in the short run but the direction of weaning off loans will help us greatly in the long run
You are right provided that there is "deleveraging". We will come to know after few years of this...
 
.
It hurts in the short run but the direction of weaning off loans will help us greatly in the long run

Agreed. Haven't I said enough time to give this government the time it needs to set its policies in motion multiple times already?
 
.
man the issue is our politicians play always politics no matter what . that is the issue
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom