striver44
BANNED
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2016
- Messages
- 4,832
- Reaction score
- -16
- Country
- Location
So recently one member @jupiter2007 shared me a video which he claims to be a proof that the US is behind ISIS.
People's like this usually reads the title and goes snapping to the conclusion without seeing what's the slightest content is all about.
here's a summary of that video:
The USA helped create Isis in a sense that after the US invasion, a chaos ensues in the form of sectarian warfare between the Sunni and Shiite. this is a rsult of the US disbanding the Iraqi army after OIF 2003.
watch from 3:39, here's a quote
from 4:50
when the US topples Saddam, they put in his place a Shiite named Noori Al Maliki as PM of Iraq
Nouri al-Maliki - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Noori Al Maliki is a known sectarian which uses Iraqi state apparatus to advanced shiite agenda in Iraq.
This resulted in discontent among Iraqi Sunni, which later helped the rise and filling the rabks of ISIS, by 2014 for example, Fallujah is a no go zone for Iraqi army.
here's a quote from 6:49
disbanding the majority Sunni Baathist Iraqi army send as many as 400.000 young men to the street without jobs or salary, in which the Jihadists make use of them. In fact if we saw the fall of Mosul in 2014, the commander of the successful Isis operation is a disbanded Iraqi army officer.
which he (the narrator) continue in 7:32
the disanded Iraqi army are replaced with a Shiite army which only gave rise to Isis popularity during the Iraqi insurgency.
This sectarian government and army (that the US put in place of the Baathists) further help Isis popularity in Iraq in 2014 after a deadly crackdown.
seeing it from a historical perspective , it's kinda strange that the US suddenly funded Isis to wreck havoc in the Middle East consider that Isis is already there as early as the late 90s, when Abu Mus'ab Al Zarqawi a Jordanian extremists based it's camp there .
it just don't make any sense whatsoever when people said that the US is behind ISIS.
so looking it carefully, The US didn't fund or create ISIS like some low IQ members stated, rather US miscalculations helped ISIS rise. There's a BIG difference between (unwillingly) enabling ISIS rise and actually funding and arming it.
also one of the most common alibi I saw is that the US is arming ISIS, this is simply not true because Iraq is already a failed country where arms are traded very easily in the black market as well as some corrupt Iraqi army officer.
Isis is also bolstered when the Syrian war started where they gained so much arms and weapons from the incompetent Syrian Arab Army, so much so that Oryxspioenkop had a while series of articles about this:
Islamic State captures Ayyash weapons depots in largest arms haul of Syrian Civil War
Islamic State captures Brigade 93 in largest heavy-arms haul of Syrian Civil War
Another One Bites the Dust: Major arms depot falls to Islamic State
Islamic State captures masses of Iranian-supplied weaponry near Khanasir
Islamic State captures large numbers of radars and missiles at Tadmur (Palmyra) airbase
this arms in turn helped Isis to regenerate power after it had been defeated by the US led Iraqi awakening movement in 2009, in which they use the equipment captured in Syria to surprise and rout the Iraqi army, in the process they also gained thousand of abandoned Iraqi military equipment . Here's one example
Iraq lost 2,300 Humvee armored vehicles in Mosul: PM
SO the only explanation is, people that believe such propaganda (usually by Iran and Russia) are dumb.
People's like this usually reads the title and goes snapping to the conclusion without seeing what's the slightest content is all about.
here's a summary of that video:
The USA helped create Isis in a sense that after the US invasion, a chaos ensues in the form of sectarian warfare between the Sunni and Shiite. this is a rsult of the US disbanding the Iraqi army after OIF 2003.
watch from 3:39, here's a quote
Another US mistake is during OIF, there are images of US soldiers abusing muslims which gave rise to discontent among Iraqi populations where they eventually turn to radicalism for revenge."the enemy in Iraq in other words are dynamic and changeable, a shadowy and loose group of former officers and soldiers of the vast security apparatus of the Saddam regime"
from 4:50
They (the US) did something much more beneficial to the jihadists cause, namely the televised image from Abu Ghraib of US soldiers picturing themselves torturing muslims
when the US topples Saddam, they put in his place a Shiite named Noori Al Maliki as PM of Iraq
Nouri al-Maliki - Wikipedia
Noori Al Maliki is a known sectarian which uses Iraqi state apparatus to advanced shiite agenda in Iraq.
This resulted in discontent among Iraqi Sunni, which later helped the rise and filling the rabks of ISIS, by 2014 for example, Fallujah is a no go zone for Iraqi army.
here's a quote from 6:49
Infact they (USA) again and again does mistake that enraged the Sunnis, make them more vulnerable, to make they think that they have to fight, in fact if we see ISIS cadre, there are a key cadre of ISI which is exclusively from the disbanded Iraqi army, all which comes from this relatively successful army that we (Americans) dissolved with little thought before hand, and send
disbanding the majority Sunni Baathist Iraqi army send as many as 400.000 young men to the street without jobs or salary, in which the Jihadists make use of them. In fact if we saw the fall of Mosul in 2014, the commander of the successful Isis operation is a disbanded Iraqi army officer.
which he (the narrator) continue in 7:32
In fact we created Isis (this way)
the disanded Iraqi army are replaced with a Shiite army which only gave rise to Isis popularity during the Iraqi insurgency.
This sectarian government and army (that the US put in place of the Baathists) further help Isis popularity in Iraq in 2014 after a deadly crackdown.
2012–2013 Iraqi protests - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
seeing it from a historical perspective , it's kinda strange that the US suddenly funded Isis to wreck havoc in the Middle East consider that Isis is already there as early as the late 90s, when Abu Mus'ab Al Zarqawi a Jordanian extremists based it's camp there .
it just don't make any sense whatsoever when people said that the US is behind ISIS.
so looking it carefully, The US didn't fund or create ISIS like some low IQ members stated, rather US miscalculations helped ISIS rise. There's a BIG difference between (unwillingly) enabling ISIS rise and actually funding and arming it.
also one of the most common alibi I saw is that the US is arming ISIS, this is simply not true because Iraq is already a failed country where arms are traded very easily in the black market as well as some corrupt Iraqi army officer.
Isis is also bolstered when the Syrian war started where they gained so much arms and weapons from the incompetent Syrian Arab Army, so much so that Oryxspioenkop had a while series of articles about this:
Islamic State captures Ayyash weapons depots in largest arms haul of Syrian Civil War
Islamic State captures Brigade 93 in largest heavy-arms haul of Syrian Civil War
Another One Bites the Dust: Major arms depot falls to Islamic State
Islamic State captures masses of Iranian-supplied weaponry near Khanasir
Islamic State captures large numbers of radars and missiles at Tadmur (Palmyra) airbase
this arms in turn helped Isis to regenerate power after it had been defeated by the US led Iraqi awakening movement in 2009, in which they use the equipment captured in Syria to surprise and rout the Iraqi army, in the process they also gained thousand of abandoned Iraqi military equipment . Here's one example
Iraq lost 2,300 Humvee armored vehicles in Mosul: PM
SO the only explanation is, people that believe such propaganda (usually by Iran and Russia) are dumb.
Last edited: