What's new

DID Nawaz really say Pakistan army back stabbed India?

So Nawaz Sharif is honestly saying he was not told or is Musharraf telling the truth that he did inform him? Who is the honest one?

May be army first served NS with some heavy lunch, with choice dishes of mutton. After the lunch, if they made some presentation on Kargil plans and their implications; NS would hardly know or even care, what the hell they are talking. Presentations, made by army, are often very tedious, particularly for a person of the kind of NS. In this process, they could have easily extracted requisite approval from this clown.
 
.
Deep State exist in EVERY STATE but about its role once I wrote


So in short I would say Creation of Pakistan was an INCOMPLETE REVOLUTION


In nutshell , establishment was also and perhaps still is , from that elite kanjar nasal.
 
.
So in short I would say Creation of Pakistan was an INCOMPLETE REVOLUTION

Any particular reason why its incomplete?
Apart from issues pertaining to Land resources and their distribution. That is something that can never be solved
 
.
The kanjar being discussed is general Zia made not British made
And Zardari is Benazir made Benazir was daughter of Bhutto and Ayub Khan made Bhutto
First understand
- The POLITICAL power base of Zia was the same political elite of Muslim League and Mullah

- Bhutto Family was part of Elite of Sindh Feudal Society and were influential even before Ayub

Secondly
Both Zia and Ayub took over the command of system from within but they were part of the system, so to satisfy their political needs they also avail the services of the existing ELITES of that time of the system (both Political and non-Political)
 
. .
In nutshell , establishment was also and perhaps still is , from that elite kanjar nasal.
establishment have many faces and it comes from every walk of life not just from one institution, so Yes..... u can Identify them if you have knowledge bout their backgrounds
 
.
So Nawaz Sharif is honestly saying he was not told or is Musharraf telling the truth that he did inform him? Who is the honest one?

General Musharraf's claim of informing the PM is not enough. Did he get the necessary permission from his Constitutionally superior authority for the operation or not is the legal question.
 
.
Guy thinks
Nawaz saying Pakistan army back stabbed india and him is not bad mouthing
It's a diseased narrative that survives only due to periodic resuscitation from PMLN leadership.

Back stabbing for Pak Army from the mouth of Vajpai and India suits them.

That it suits Nawaz Sharif to keep repeating it since his return is because he had a lucrative family business agenda in the works with Jindals that required him to put army on the back foot and try to subdue it against Indian designs.

By the way, why didn't Nawaz argue that Indra Gandhi and Gen.Zia were back stabbed by Indian Army in 80s by militarizing a previously non-militarized Siachin Glacier? That was the aggression that was pending with a right to response from Pakistan's side.

Why didn't Nawaz Argue that Kargil was a response to Siachin aggression from India?

Why is it so easy for Nawaz to accuse it as Back Stabbing?
 
.
That desert is growing only on Pakistani side btw. India has invested massively in making their desert green.
No it is not. Tiny drops of green in arid yellow is precious little. It still is desert. And just so that you know even what they have done is thanks to water having been 'pinched' from upper Indus tributery rivers in Punjab like Ravi etc. That is why we have had deficit on the Pak side of Punjab and a huge surprus on the Indian Punjab side much of which has been diverted south into Rajasthan deserts via Indira Gandhi canal.


But this still does not qualify as permanent physical boundary that could create two distinct countries or civilisations
What does then. Another planet? A ocean? 95% of the countries on earth have no geographic boundary. As a Gastierbeiter of the Germans even drove into France, Poland, Denmark or Belgium. Was there some Mt. Everst in the way? Maybe a ocean? Maybe even a desert?

I am not interested in British schemes of protectionism in the region.
Anymore then I am interested in a German Gaisterbieters ideas who is PDF's version of a Gatling gun firing blanks. Lot of sound but #nocontent.
 
.
May be army first served NS with some heavy lunch, with choice dishes of mutton. After the lunch, if they made some presentation on Kargil plans and their implications; NS would hardly know or even care, what the hell they are talking. Presentations, made by army, are often very tedious, particularly for a person of the kind of NS. In this process, they could have easily extracted requisite approval from this clown.

A clown NS may be, but doing such devious illegal adventurism makes the Army no better than criminals, please do keep in mind.
 
. . .
Any particular reason why its incomplete?
because it failed to achieve the desire results other than the creation of a new country.
Apart from issues pertaining to Land resources and their distribution. That is something that can never be solved
It failed to Create a Power Sharing system b/w the Political/Governing Elites and General Public of the new State, this thing gave opportunity other power hungry elements both from Civilian and Military segments
Power of Ayub Khan and Zia ul Haq was army
yes during early days but they both realise the importance of the support of elites from non Military background, Nawab KalaBagh is one Prime example of limitation faced by Ayub
 
. .
General Musharraf's claim of informing the PM is not enough. Did he get the necessary permission from his Constitutionally superior authority for the operation or not is the legal question.
You mean like the paper work that was going around all over the place in India when they were planning Feb26th attack so that ISI can pick it's trail, lol.

Dear, only some people knew it verbally.

I'm not defending Musharraf at all, I don't know who is telling the truth between him and Musharraf dear.

How about a picture:

5b7c0d9305292.jpg

Nawaz Sharif and Pervez Musharraf at Keil sector near Rawalakot on the Line of Control in February 1999 | AFP

It's a known fact that Nawaz had an attention span of not more than 10 seconds. Good luck being serious with him when top of his agenda is devouring and commending chicken sandwiches on the table or pointing out lack of them.

Imagine Nawaz understand the operational maps used for the briefing, trying to figure out what the line on the map meant in terms of real distances on the ground, or what the military symbols signified, may be he was told the exact thing but may be he was led on a wild goose chase of maps he could hardly understand if they were affixed to Kim bakers demarcated zones. (<<You might learn something if you follow the link)

I think you get the picture but I'm sure it won't stop you from what you want to push.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom