What's new

Dhaka third least liveable city: EIU

It is of no use to state that It's a hell in earth. Dead city overall.

The positive approach would be to make it a great city.

Act positive!

Or is it a sad case that has no redemption as was Sodom and Gomorrah?
 
. .
Wrong report. Dhaka is still second last in the list.

14o67fm.jpg


http://www.eiu.com/Handlers/WhitepaperHandler.ashx?fi=Liveability_August2011_PDF.pdf&mode=wp

Wrong list. Your list is from last year. I'll try to get a hold of this year's list and post it here.

But being 2nd and 3rd are basically the same shyt. With the relentless dedication of our politicians, Dhaka will someday topple Harare from its envious position. :lol:
 
.
I assume all anti-India people here(wont name them), are amazed how no India cities have made it onto the list. :P

I'd be surprised if no indian cities made it to the ranking of around 140 cities. Maybe indian cities are higher up in the list?
 
.
Interestingly the criteria does not include security. Dhaka is not bothered with bombings and shootings that regularly occur in other large cities of SA. The problem is not Dhaka's but the entire nation's. Our land space is too little to support a population of over 200 mlln (officially 160 mlln).
 
.
In all of the cities present on this list i wuld like to live in karachi a good city overall n with a sea the only thing i wnt like is the regular shoot outs
 
.
Wrong list. Your list is from last year. I'll try to get a hold of this year's list and post it here.

But being 2nd and 3rd are basically the same shyt. With the relentless dedication of our politicians, Dhaka will someday topple Harare from its envious position. :lol:

Its August, 2011 list. Isnt the link I put up there working for you guys?

106lpbq.jpg


9bhr9d.jpg



I'd be surprised if no indian cities made it to the ranking of around 140 cities. Maybe indian cities are higher up in the list?

Herp derp.

AI-BM978A_OZCIT_G_20110830120302.jpg


Delhi is at 112 and Mumbai 116. Not that great, but still better than Dhaka.
 
.
Interestingly the criteria does not include security. Dhaka is not bothered with bombings and shootings that regularly occur in other large cities of SA. The problem is not Dhaka's but the entire nation's. Our land space is too little to support a population of over 200 mlln (officially 160 mlln).

Interestingly it does. If you look at the fifth column, "stability", it includes security situation as well.

73dnk3.jpg
 
.
Im shocked dhaka is not ranked the worst city to live in. The traffic is by far the worst I have seen in my life and the roads very poorly planned.
 
. . .
I think if Bangladeshis made the rankings then Dhakka would be a lot higher.

these ranks usually have a lot of bias in them. Dhakka is probabaly very liveable for Dhakkans.

It is, once you adapt to it:)
 
.
Most of such studies on ranking of cities, products are basically sponsored by top participants to attract tourists, media coverage. case in point is position of Tehran which got lower position as a better position will be positive coverage for Iranian Government. These studies are like 'who is number one heroine at bollywood?'. These rankings are not conducted on scientific basis as judgements/biases are involved in ranking. We should not take such things seriously.
 
.
56099739.jpg


Dhaka can be good city to live if we can some how cut the population in half. This is how Dhaka look during Eid. This can be achieved through decentralization and relocation the heavy industries in port city Chittagong. However, idiots in Dhaka thinking otherwise.
 
.
Cutting population is only feasible if people are not prolific.

Industry is based on proximity to natural resources, govt centres and infrastructure.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom