What's new

Dhaka may arrest top Islamist leader for war crimes

CaPtAiN_pLaNeT

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
7,685
Reaction score
0
Dhaka may arrest top Islamist leader for war crimes
2011-01-30 15:10:00

Dhaka may arrest top Islamist leader for war crimes

Dhaka, Jan 30 (IANS) Bangladesh's top Islamist leader Ghulam Azam, who chaired the formation of the militia that allegedly killed thousands of unarmed civilians four decades ago, may be arrested on charges of committing 'war crimes', a media report said.

Mohammad Abdul Hannan Khan, the senior-most member of the International War Crimes Tribunal of Bangladesh, said 'some progress' in investigation into the allegations against Azam had been conducted.

He, however, did not mention about any time-frame for Azam's arrest, The Daily Star reported Sunday.

Azam, 88, was the Ameer (chief) of the Jamaat-e-Islami in then East Pakistan beginning 1969. He led the formation of the Shanti Committee, Al Shams, Al Badr and Razakars -- various Islamist militia accused of acting on behalf of the then Pakistani Martial Law administration.

Ghulam Azam met Gen. Tikka Khan, the East Pakistan administrator, and expressed support, ten days after the freedom movement formally began on March 25, 1971.

He also lobbied against the acknowledgment of new-born Bangladesh after 1971 with the demand called 'Bangladesh Na Manjoor' (Bangladesh not approved). During this activity Ghulam Azam sent requests to Middle Eastern countries to deny recognition to Bangladesh. It continued until the late 1980s.

Azam remained in that post, through his detention and exile in Britain. For several years, denied Bangladeshi citizenship, he was living 'illegally', till the Supreme Court restored his citizenship in 1994 on the grounds that he was born in Dhaka.

He was the Jamaat chief throughout, till 2000 and has since 'distanced himself', from the party, The newspaper said.

If and when arrested, Azam would be joining five of the current top brass of the Jamaat that is the country's largest Islamist party.

The only other non-Jamaat person to be detained for 'war crimes' and up for trial is Salahuddin Qader Chowdhury, a businessman-lawmaker of the main opposition Bangladesh nationalist Party (BNP).

Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina's government has updated a 1973 law to constitute a three-judge panel that is preparing for the trial of 'war criminals', which is an emotional issue in the country that claims three million perished during the 10-month freedom struggle.

The trial is expected to be wrapped up in three years' time. But Shahriar Kabir, convenor of a forum called Antorjatik Aporadh Tribunal Dhaka Sohayak Mancha (platform for supporting the tribunal) warned that unless the tribunal was adequately staffed, it could take much longer.

Investigator Hannan Khan also complained of lack of coordination with the government, the newspaper said.
 
.
Really good news after many years. He should be hanged asap.
 
.
Ghulam Azam should have been the first to arrest if awami league was serious about war crime issues. However, he maintained close relations with sheikh hasina back in 1994 according to many sources, I assume he still does.
 
.
Gonjo said:
Really good news after many years. He should be hanged asap.

Ghulam Azam should have been the first to arrest if awami league was serious about war crime issues. However, he maintained close relations with sheikh hasina back in 1994 according to many sources, I assume he still does.

Is there any hard evidence related war crime(massive killing of innocence) against him. Just because he supported united Pakistan doesn't make him war criminal. Let not mix of two for ill politics.

Are we fool enough to believe that war criminal only belong to BNP and Jamat? Words on the street that there are real war criminal hiding under AL.
 
.
A person cannot be regarded as a war criminal unless he has ordered or participated to kill unarmed civilians of a war, or has ordered or paticipated to burn houses, and do lootings or other heinous crimes. Gulam Azam has fought for an united Pakistan, there is no doubt. But, the BD govt has to prove that he had ordered or had participated in looting and burning houses and killing people.

I think, there are certain limitations that have been imposed by UNO so that a govt cannot try a war criminal on wishful crime charges. Gulam Azam's stance against the formation of Bangladesh cannot be regarded as a criminal act, because it was a political issue.

AL's main goal is to make war crime an issue in the next election. It will be hanging in the air for the next three years, and AL will issue promise that it will certainly try the war criminals if they are re-elected. AL stance will force BNP to take a stand positive or negative.
 
Last edited:
.
Ghulam Azam should have been the first to arrest if awami league was serious about war crime issues. However, he maintained close relations with sheikh hasina back in 1994 according to many sources, I assume he still does.

Gulam azam is under house arrest and the intelligence agency are monitoring his activity .moreover at te age of 88 a man cannot be arrested which may arise sympathy for him. wither he really involve in any killing is not proven but his and his support for united pakistan and solving the problem of east pakistan is never denied by Jamat . but unfortunately Jamat could not realized that public support for Pakistan gone at the moment when the pakistan army start crack down .
 
.
Well done BD govt. Kudos to AL and its leader Sheikh hasina for her guts and bold actions. :tup:
 
.
If there would an war between India and BD, then how many Hindus would fright for BD? I think all most all the Hindu people would act like those so-called Razakars. So no more political exploitation of the word "Razakar" to get political gains as done by AL-IN media. :hitwall:

I can not blame people for their personal choice and ideology if they would support United Pakistan in 71. Simple. But killing innocent people was crime, if any.
 
.
If there would an war between India and BD, then how many Hindus would fright for BD? I think all most all the Hindu people would act like those so-called Razakars. So no more political exploitation of the word "Razakar" to get political gains as done by AL-IN media. :hitwall:

I can not blame people for their personal choice and ideology if they would support United Pakistan in 71. Simple. But killing innocent people was crime, if any.

But, have you ever given a thought on the roles that our Hindus had played in the 1971 war of liberation? While almost 100% of the people who took shelter in the Indian refugee camps were Hindus, not even 1% of the Muktis were Hindus. We fought to save them and also to free the country, but they themselves did not act. Probably they thought it was a war between two idiot muslim groups.

The same may occur when there is a BD-India conflict in the future. You want to call them a new group of razakars, but, then what were they in 1971? I do not think they will fight alongside the Indian army. Because they will lose everything they have in their country, Bangladesh. War is a nasty thing. Even if a few of them help IA, there will certainly be a collective punishment on them whether it is fair or not. But, I think they will remain neutral.
 
. .
He is too old now. May be he did lots of wrong. but you can't do anything now.
 
.
Is there any hard evidence related war crime(massive killing of innocence) against him. Just because he supported united Pakistan doesn't make him war criminal. Let not mix of two for ill politics.

Are we fool enough to believe that war criminal only belong to BNP and Jamat? Words on the street that there are real war criminal hiding under AL.

We are seeing the images of that evil person and pakistani army officers for many years on print, tv. Anyone who lives inside Bangladesh, surely used to see this. He just didn't support the Pakistan, he did much help to hunt down our beloved muktijoddha's, recruiting razakaars, help raping innocent womens. Feel free to visit Muktijuddho Jadughor if u come to Bangladesh for to see more and more evidence.

Well when a Razaakar established a party, its normal other razakaars would be poured into it. Simple.

And, day by day new facts with reference are coming out. But ur claims look backdated, as those perception did existed till the 90's.
 
.
Any fair 'war crimes trial' would take to task both those on the rebel/terrorist side who committed massacres, as well as those on the Pakistani side that did so.

This is merely a one-sided horse and pony show to remove political opponents and neutralize the Islamist political bloc in Bangladesh.
 
.
While almost 100% of the people who took shelter in the Indian refugee camps were Hindus

100%? ...... 10 Million of your refugees(I quote from Mark Cutts Book) were Hindu's? That would mean the complete Hindu population left BD and you should not be having any hindu population left in your country.

Do you have any historical data to back your claims? Awaiting your comments.
 
.
100%? ...... 10 Million of your refugees(I quote from Mark Cutts Book) were Hindu's? That would mean the complete Hindu population left BD and you should not be having any hindu population left in your country.

Do you have any historical data to back your claims? Awaiting your comments.

10 million refugees is an estimate, not a verified fact.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom