The Accountant
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2016
- Messages
- 8,504
- Reaction score
- 20
- Country
- Location
Yes my pants were down and guess whom I was screwing ? It was you buddy ...You are again caught with pants down, when presneted with logic. What was your claim...that f 16s were not involved in the operation at all?
Besides i answered this question in my previous post..go read it again .
According IAF, it did.
My logic is simple , Indians are big fat liars and they lied to the teeth about all the actions on 26th and 27th ...
So tell me if MKI was able to evade AMRAAM from a distance of 40 Kms , then why he was not able to lock on F16s from 40 KMs ? Why did your powerful radar did not provide any firing solution ? Don't tell me he was busy evading ... He should already have a lock way before coming within 40 Kms range of F16s
Their can be only two answers:
- Either MKI cannot even lock F16s from 40 KMs due to superior jamming from F16s and MKI proved to be a dud weapon system
- Or MKI never dared to come so close to F16s and when F16s fired the AMRAAM from maximum distance and MKI radar was still not able to get lock , MKI chose to disengage and flee?
THere cant be any third explanation ... So choose the best humiliation you want and if you dont know the answer which I am sure you don't then shoo and go away you kid ...
Last edited: