What's new

‘Desecration’ holy book causes uproar in Sikh community

Spring Onion

PDF VETERAN
Joined
Feb 1, 2006
Messages
41,403
Reaction score
19
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
‘Desecration’ of holy book causes uproar in Sikh community




SHIKARPUR/KARACHI: A huge rift over the alleged desecration of a holy book was averted in Shikarpur after two groups belonging to the Hindu and Sikh minorities reached a compromise.

However, the Sikhs, who are a smaller minority in Shikarpur, reported being threatened by local Hindus in the area.

The incident caused an uproar after Sikh students shared pictures of a recently held four-day mela (festival) in Jai Samadha Ashram in Shikarpur where the head of the Hindu temple was seen holding the Guru Granth Sahib (Holy book of Sikhs) bare-headed.
But in others, he was photographed drawing signs and symbols on the holy book.

The temple, housing both Geeta and Guru Granth Sahib for decades, is the most frequented place of worship for both religious communities.


In the pictures that circulated on social networking site Facebook, the head of the temple, Swami Saeen Narayan Bhajan, a young man in his late 20s, is seen signing the scripture after drawing a symbol belonging to the Hindu faith.

Within an hour, the pictures created a furor among Sikh residents in the area, who then contacted their local representatives. Eventually, the pictures reached the head of the Pakistan Hindu Council, Sardar Ramesh Singh, who led a 22-member team to Shikarpur to sort out the matter.

“Young men were ready to fight and kill each other if we hadn’t reached in time,” he narrated while giving an interview on phone.

Singh, who was shown the pictures, said “coloured pen was used to create drawings of Hindu God Ganesha on a few pages” which angered many in the community.

The matter was resolved after Swami Narayan Bhajan admitted his mistake and apologised to the community elders, adding that he did not intend any disrespect.

Tara Singh, head of the Pakistan Sikh Gurdhwara Prabandhak (Managing) Committee, said that they want peace to prevail between the two communities.

“We don’t want the situation to get out of hand. And believe in forgive and forget,” he added.

However, Singh said that, some of the families who informed the elders about the incident later received text messages threatening them for “publicising the incident to gain attention,” causing panic within the community.

Similarly, since the incident was resolved among the communities, no FIR was launched at Lakhi Dar police station, Station House Officer, Anwar (last name not given), informed.

Speaking up in the defense of the temple head, SHO Anwar said that: “Both communities wanted to end the incident peacefully, until a young Sikh man abused Narayan Bhajan.”

When inquired about the incident, SSP Shikarpur Parvez Ahmed Chandio said that an inquiry has been ‘set up’, the report of which will be received within three days. “Till that time I can’t say much about the issue.”

DIG Security, Naushad Sheikh however denied that such an incident had occurred in the area.

“The four day mela at the Jai Samadha Ashram concluded peacefully, and no such incident of desecration of a holy book was reported to me.”

The head of the temple, even after being contacted several times, did not respond to give his side of the story.

Considering the sort of hype and anger such incidents create, the head of the Delhi Dharam Parchar Committee in India has also written a letter to both the Pakistan High Commission as well as the head of the Evacuee Trust in Islamabad to look into the matter.


‘Desecration’ of holy book causes uproar in Sikh community | DAWN.COM
 
.
Hun Kar lo Gall..

One new type of panga and a new dimension.

They should sit across & sort it out .
 
. .
Persecuted minorities always get defensive on all these silly things.Nothing new.
 
.
Let me get this right - holding the book without head cover is "desecration"? Is there anything we will not be willing to take offense at? We have gone from Freedom of Religion to Freedom FROM religion

An excerpt for the protocol for carrying the Guru Granth sahib :

Personal Behaviour

Any person carrying out any Service or Sewa for Guru Granth Sahib MUST observe the following:

Head must be covered at all times with turban or patka or chuuni or scarf, etc.

Shoes must be removed outside the Guru's room.

observe basic standards of personal hygiene ie: have a shower; wash hands; fresh/clean clothes; don't wear socks or gloves. etc

If you have to visit the toilet, have a shower and change your clothing before serving the Guru.

When reading from the Guru, you must cover the mouth with suitable cloth ie: Hazzoria, large clean handkerchief, etc

No eating or drinking while in service.

No small talk while in Guru's service.


http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Guru_Granth_Sahib_protocol

No one enters a Gurudwara without headgear / Cover.
 
.
Yes, bu the man was not even a Sikh - - how could he possibly be accused of desecration when it does not even apply to a non-Sikh -- or does it?
 
.
Yes, bu the man was not even a Sikh - - how could he possibly be accused of desecration when it does not even apply to a non-Sikh -- or does it?

It does.

If I enter a Mosque I would be expected to follow the decorum of a Mosque.
 
.
Interesting... do note how no one was arrested on charges of blasphemy but then when the Quran is defiled something happens in the bum of mullahs and they begin ranting. This is a classic example of laws being used and applied selectively. In either case I do not think the issue between Sikh and Hindu community should have been complicated further with allegations of blasphemy.

But still its a point to ponder. Blasphemy law applies only to insults against Muslims but why does it not apply when a muslim gardener calls a Christian a ***** or something else? Law is selectively being applied here.
 
.
Yes, bu the man was not even a Sikh - - how could he possibly be accused of desecration when it does not even apply to a non-Sikh -- or does it?

The accused person is a temple head no ordinary layman. and the Sikhs also accused him of drawing Hindu symbols on the book.

anyway my focus was on the misuse of the social media like facebook for spreading tension.
 
. .
One of these days all sensible people across the globe are going to lose it and start rioting on streets because the rest of the world insults their intelligence all the time.

Then we will simply jail those 15-20 people and it will be back to business.
 
. .
doesnt matter who started what; both communities should be warned to avoid communal/anti-social behaviour -- which serves nobody.

no need for them to be posturing against eachother

The accused person is a temple head no ordinary layman. and the Sikhs also accused him of drawing Hindu symbols on the book.

anyway my focus was on the misuse of the social media like facebook for spreading tension.

and that coupled by the ability to doctor photographs using Adobe applications........

it has potential to be a nightmare of sorts - given how emotional people get......which is why even "democratic" india imprisons people and monitors peoples' facebook activity (go figure)
 
.
The accused person is a temple head no ordinary layman. and the Sikhs also accused him of drawing Hindu symbols on the book.

anyway my focus was on the misuse of the social media like facebook for spreading tension.

Come on now it's we who spread tension, not FB or twitter - we take offense at absolutely anything -- The ideas behind any religion are peace but we always want a fight
 
.
Foundation of each and every religion is peace and harmony.But today who cares!!The people who got so much defended at this incident do really know what is written in the book?No,they don't.Otherwise they would have reacted in a gentle manner,raised their objection with tolerance.As long as we,the South Asians don't understand the book, better keep it aside.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom