What's new

Delhi: The city of djinns

Status
Not open for further replies.
Your posts have lost all sense off late.
Qutab Minar was a tower - the tower itself was not a Hindu temple. But the mosque - Quatul Islam Mosque(that houses the Minar) is built on Hindu temple. This is documented and beyond any dispute.

As for the rest of your rant - it was as bad as the one you quoted.

1. I know the history of Kutub minar and there is nothing to prove it was over a temple or anything like that. As far as the Mosque it is in the northeast of the minar and even that is NOT on a temple but one monuments built in memory of a King .



As far as the rest what is bad about it?

Do you believe in Akhand Bharat? was there even an AKHAND in the history of Hindus in this entire region?

there was NON neither in your faith even. You have divisions made to serve a particular class that's all.
 
.
1. I know the history of Kutub minar and there is nothing to prove it was over a temple or anything like that. As far as the Mosque it is in the northeast of the minar and even that is NOT on a temple but one monuments built in memory of a King .



As far as the rest what is bad about it?

Do you believe in Akhand Bharat? was there even an AKHAND in the history of Hindus in this entire region?

there was NON neither in your faith even. You have divisions made to serve a particular class that's all.

most indians dont believe in akhand barat. its the same wet dreams as the one you guys call by the name of ummah which has never existed.
 
.
with all deu respect SO i answered to the guy who asked what india has so anyone would attack us well you can read history why barbarians attacked india from west/central asia for centuries and i guess it / my answer has hurt your ego ...oops im sorri

lolzz how it hurt my ego in the first place??

Invaders attacks your land nothing new expansions are like that every expansionist movement is destructive irrespective of the faith.

as far as akhand bharat bull crap there was never one and cant be one.

As far as your boasting about your wish to destroy your Muslim heritage and Muslim population well GOOD LUCK to you :P

I wish your wish comes true.
 
. . .
Firstly misterr, with all due respect taj mahal was a hindu temple. there is a lot of history distortion by Congressi secular traitors in our country who want to portray muslim as brothers of hindus, but we all know reality is otherwise.

And hindus are turning into one unified block slowly, by the grace of Modi, all us Hindu brothers and sisters (and even other dharmic faiths like buddhists sikhs jains etc) are uniting. We hindus and other indian religions all have the same blood running in our veins and same dna. We are one unified nation, and modi is working hard to unite us under his command.

It is better for pakistanis to not talk about things they might not know about regarding india.

bwahahahahahahaha how Hindus are turning into one unified faith?

Sikhs don't consider themselves Hindus where Hindus extremists groups have been clubbing them as one of branch of Hinduism which Sikhs rejected.

jains/Buddhists also don't consider themselves part of Hinduism.


Secondly PROVE IT That Taj Mahal was a hindu temple.
 
.
:yes4:

Aww there there you little *add expletive here**. I can think of at least 10 apt words to describe your kind; wait, actually, many many more, but meh...I should know better than to sling back at an imbecile. :yes4:

Now go and stand before a mirror. Then shout out those expletives to your face. Add ten more from my side.
 
.
Secondly PROVE IT That Taj Mahal was a hindu temple.

i hope you use the sme rational and ask for proof regarding the claims of your founder.

Now go and stand before a mirror. Then shout out those expletives to your face. Add ten more from my side.

gosh you must be 8 years old to actually say about showing a mirror. jeez
 
.
bwahahahahahahaha how Hindus are turning into one unified faith?

Sikhs don't consider themselves Hindus where Hindus extremists groups have been clubbing them as one of branch of Hinduism which Sikhs rejected.

jains/Buddhists also don't consider themselves part of Hinduism.


Secondly PROVE IT That Taj Mahal was a hindu temple.

SIkhs Jains and Buddhists are not part of Hindu faith, they are separate religions but they have the same blood and DNA as Hindus. We celebrate similar festivals, have similar culture, similar food, similar attire. There is mroe brotherhood in India between Hindus and Buddhists/Jains/Sikhs, then the different sects in Pakistan. Except 1984 where Congressi sickulars attacked innocent Sikhs, we dharmic people have always lived like brothers for the past 2000 yrs.

Even Indian christians in this regard are actually very integrated into Indian culture, because some Indian christians have been living with us for the past 2000 yrs. Muslims have very different culture however(despite living in india for a long time), they wear burkhas while we wear sarees, they study in madrassas while we study in schools, etc.

In India, hindus, sikhs buddhists and jains are very similar people and it is very hard to tell them apart except turban for sikhs. Next cmes christians, and muslims are usually very reluctant to integrate so they stick out. No offfence, just my personal opinion.
 
. .
i hope you use the sme rational and ask for proof regarding the claims of your founder.

What Jinnah has to do with a structure ??? :what:.

anyway where is the proof for Taj mahal as hindu temple??
 
.
What Jinnah has to do with a structure ??? :what:.

anyway where is the proof for Taj mahal as hindu temple??
i mean the founder of 1500 yrs ago

i agree that taj is not a hindu temple - but it could have been built on a demolished temple since most of the monuments were like that
 
.
What Jinnah has to do with a structure ??? :what:.

anyway where is the proof for Taj mahal as hindu temple??

well there are many but the investigation in this dept. was stopped by the so called secular GOI as it might hurt the relegious sentiments of 'minorities' /muslims but this is hardli going to make a difference as Taj is a big tourist destination and we bieng a secula nations would love to keep it that way we are not of those who bring down historical monuments for the sake of fanatisim

the thread was about delhi bieng city of Djinns yet progressing as one of the worlds best capital cities and yes we have some problems but who dosent ?

any way i know its hard for pakistanies and bangladeshies to see anything good happening in India but who cares cary on with your hate towards india

as kabeer said 'nindak nere rakhiye'

Good Luck & carry on :coffee:
 
.
i mean the founder of 1500 yrs ago

What even our Prophet has to do with a structure in India??



i agree that taj is not a hindu temple - but it could have been built on a demolished temple since most of the monuments were like that

Good you came to your senses after knowing you don't have any evidence
 
.
Someone has actually built a Taj look-alike at the outskirts of Dhaka. We have our Lalbagh Quilla built by the Mughals. Meanwhile thank you for taking care of that which is ours.Let a new Ahmed Shah Abdali appear and we will relieve you of that function.

New Ahmad Shah Abdali? :omghaha: AND a Taj look alike, seen it, looks nothing like the Taj.:omghaha: You people are a blot on the ghazis, but then what can one expect from inferior stock.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom