Delhi elections and indifference of Hindus

[jamahir]

If Modi gets rid of them, a complete hatred-full India will make Pakistan job easy.

And what do you say Pakistan's job is ??

 

[graphican]

And what do you say Pakistan's job is ??

To make Pakistan a better living place.

 

[jamahir]

To make Pakistan a better living place.

And you are saying that will happen with a very hostile neighbor and a chance of war ( even border war ) ??

 

[Wood]

Dehli has shown that some Indians can still differentiate between leadership (Arvind K) and hater-ship (Modi).

Delhi elections were not about Modi. Do you cannot call that as a defeat of the PM. Central elections in states like Tamil Nadu however were demonstration of some parts of the population not subscribing to his brand of politics.

 

[fitpOsitive]

You know the best way to be a millionaire?
Start with a billion.

Of course, but sometimes that thing kills everything around.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Of course, but sometimes that thing kills everything around.

True, true. Now who will cast the first stone?

 

[fitpOsitive]

Removal of triple talaq had nothing to do with giving Muslim women their rights , more to put the Muslim man in his place by these guys .

Of course, good thing to do. But lynching is not a civilised manner either...and many groups have many things that, I am sure, no body dares to correct.

 

[KhanBaba2]

Removal of 370 article is a best decision in Indian history after Independence.

Actually it is not. For 70+ years, separatist feeling in Kashmir was under control because of the 370 article. It will now take a real statesman to defuse the situation. Till then Kashmir will have to be controlled by force.

 

[graphican]

And you are saying that will happen with a very hostile neighbor and a chance of war ( even border war ) ??

Very hostile neighbour (under Modi) has facilitated Paksitan to become a peaceful country already. Ever since Modi came in power, India's dirty games in Paksitan got intensified and exposed - and resultantly today Paksitan is a peaceful country. This is a fact.

• 0 Terrorism in Baluchistan
• 0 terrorism in FATA
• 0 terrorism in Karachi
• 0 terrorism in Gilgit Baltistan

While you give credit to soldiers in Paksitan, you got to give credit to inept and incapable Govt in India for losing all to Paksitan. Even in Afghanistan, India has no standing anymore and TTP hideouts are being destroyed by Paksitan.

Second credit that Modi deserves is the destruction of peace and harmony in Kashmir. Lift curfews and see the love coming to you.

Third credit that Modi deserves is that people in India are preparing for second partition. If Paksitan had to fight a war with India because India had a hostile Government then sure - Paksitan knows a dying India will eventually go for war before finally breaking into pieces.

 

[fitpOsitive]

True, true. Now who will cast the first stone?

Good question. But, will they accept this first stone? For me it was casted like 1400 years ago.
I don't support all doings by Muslims, as our history is full of black stains, and I will never defend that. But, if someone comes to me, says that I am an scoundrel, I will most probably remind him, that his own history is full of shiiiit. So, when we all culprits, and not perfect, then let's accept each other like that.

 

[graphican]

Delhi elections were not about Modi. Do you cannot call that as a defeat of the PM. Central elections in states like Tamil Nadu however were demonstration of some parts of the population not subscribing to his brand of politics.

Oh really? Wasn't BJP taking part in Dehli's elections? Wasn't Modi giving anti-Pakistan speeches from Dehli and that 10-12 days of victory thing came from him?

 

[jamahir]

Third credit that Modi deserves is that people in India are preparing for second partition.

I assure you they are not.

If Paksitan had to fight a war with India because India had a hostile Government then sure - Paksitan knows a dying India will eventually go for war before finally breaking into pieces.

Maybe, maybe not.

 

[graphican]

I assure you they are not.
Maybe, maybe not.

Let Modi do the job - and we will see.

 

[jamahir]

Let Modi do the job - and we will see.

OK.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Good question. But, will they accept this first stone? For me it was casted like 1400 years ago.
I don't support all doings by Muslims, as our history is full of black stains, and I will never defend that. But, if someone comes to me, says that I am an scoundrel, I will most probably remind him, that his own history is full of shiiiit. So, when we all culprits, and not perfect, then let's accept each other like that.

Not advisable; whataboutery is a weak counter. Instead, if you take him up on merit, it can come to a fairly well-defined conclusion. First of all, of course, personally speaking, I reject agglomeration of religious communities; I don't know anybody who is a Muslim who meets all the descriptive criteria any more than I know any Hindu who meets all the descriptive criteria. Arguing that Muslims did this, and Hindus did that is fatuous, IMHO.

Following from this, second, is the difficulty in finding a common stream, a minimum programme, to use a term from coalition politics of today, that indicates what is the core, what must be done; this is true both of 'Muslims', using the term as a place-marker in spite of just having rejected it, and of 'Hindus'.

The third point of deviation is that there is today the overlay of class, over and all this, and fourth, the overlay of endogamous social groups, or castes. So if we consider the four characteristics of citizenship profile that we just built up ad hoc, we have at least one choice at each point, therefore 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 16 or more characteristics to watch out for - there may be more.

Is it, in your opinion, possible to find large groups of people who match each other on all 16 (or more) characteristics? I find it a surreal exercise, not worth your time and effort. Nor that of anybody else.

Sir Jee: You mean that Modi may now act as a stray rabid dog?

Confused.

You evidently detect some changes.