What's new

Deep Blue Aerospace yesterday conducted a one kilometre level launch and landing VTVL test

. .
Good. This will light a fire under Musk's azz. Competition is good for progress.

Although, in all honesty, such a landing was performed in 1969, long before SpaceX or Deep Blue, by the Apollo 11 Lunar Lander Eagle, albeit in a vacuum and 1/6th gravity with a feather light module.
 
.

Deep Blue Aerospace completes kilometer-level rocket launch and landing test​

by Andrew Jones — May 7, 2022
The Nebula-M1 test article during its VTVL test flight above Tongchuan, Shaanxi Province, on May 6, 2022.
The Nebula-M1 test article during its VTVL test flight above Tongchuan, Shaanxi Province, on May 6, 2022. Credit: Deep Blue Aerospace

HELSINKI — A Chinese launch startup sent a small rocket test stage up to an altitude of one kilometer Friday before a performing a powered descent and vertical landing.
Deep Blue Aerospace, founded in 2017, conducted the test May 6 with the Nebula M1 test article at a facility at Tongchuan, Shaanxi Province, landing within less than half a meter of the landing pad “bullseye”.
The test is a milestone in the development of the full Nebula-1 rocket with a recoverable first stage, and indicative of progress and efforts by Chinese launch startups to develop reusable launchers.
The Nebula M1 is powered by a variable thrust Leiting-5 (“Thunder-5”) electric-pump-fed kerosene-liquid oxygen engine. The landing in the video is obscured by dust thrown up by the thrust, but the company claims the test was successful.



The Nebula-M was used in two earlier, successful tests to altitudes of around 10 and 100 meters. New tests—to altitudes of 10 and 100 kilometers—will be conducted using a new test stage on the same scale as the full scale Nebula-1 rocket. It will use more powerful 20-ton-thrust Leiting-20 engines, which are to undergo testing as a next step.

The first orbital launch and recovery of the Nebula-1 is planned for before the end of 2024.

Huo Liang, founder of Deep Blue Aerospace, told SpaceNews in an earlier interview that the firm is targeting both private launch contracts and government programs including the national satellite Internet project and the space station as possible revenue streams.

The company received a boost last month, announcing undisclosed A+ round financing April 19, three months after it raised $31.5 million in A round funding. Last autumn Deep Blue Aerospace employed nearly 100 people, with some coming from China’s traditional space industry institutes and companies, and some from areas such as the automobile and aviation industries. Around 70 percent of the team are engineers.

Deep Blue Aerospace claims the vertical takeoff, vertical landing (VTVL) reached the highest altitude for such a test conducted in China, while also reaching the greatest speed and longest flight time.

The apparent previous altitude record was of 300.2 meters set by Linkspace in 2019 using its RLV-T5 vehicle. After an apparent hiatus, Linkspace is now targeting a 100-kilometer level test in Q4 this year after a recent successful static fire test of the larger, methane-liquid oxygen RLV-T6.

Deep Blue Aerospace and Linkspace are not the only commercial Chinese launch firms working towards reusability. Beijing-based iSpace is developing the methalox Hyperbola-2 launcher while Galactic Energy (Pallas-1), Space Pioneer and others are also developing liquid propellant launchers and vertical takeoff, vertical landing capabilities.

Landspace, one of the early movers in China, recently released images of its Zhuque-2, suggesting its first test launch is near. While the launch will be expendable, the firm plans to convert the methalox rocket into a reusable launcher.

The country’s main space contractor, the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corp. (CASC), is also exploring reusability with its Long March 8 derived from existing Long March rockets, while a reusable variant based on the Long March 6 is being developed by CASC’s Shanghai Academy of Spaceflight Technology.

CASC is also developing a new, reusable launcher with three cores for human spaceflight, while its Long March 9 super heavy-lift rocket could also be made reusable.

 
.
Good. This will light a fire under Musk's azz. Competition is good for progress.

Although, in all honesty, such a landing was performed in 1969, long before SpaceX or Deep Blue, by the Apollo 11 Lunar Lander Eagle, albeit in a vacuum and 1/6th gravity with a feather light module.
All SpaceX did was hired some top scientist from NASA.
 
.
Good. This will light a fire under Musk's azz. Competition is good for progress.

Although, in all honesty, such a landing was performed in 1969, long before SpaceX or Deep Blue, by the Apollo 11 Lunar Lander Eagle, albeit in a vacuum and 1/6th gravity with a feather light module.
CSA got something better than recovery landing. Check TengYun project.
 
. . . .
Was that all it took to make what Spacex is now? Imagine if they hired another top scientist from NASA. Imagine if they hire 10 more.
Honestly, I don't see any SpaceX tech has any Edge over NASA or even China Space technology.
 
. .
Once again it is China that will probably break US monopoly in reuseable rocket. The same scenarios happened in social media(Facebook, Twitter, youtube vs Tiktok, Wechat), EV (Tesla vs BYD, Xiaopeng ect), phone OS( Android vs Hongmeng). AI, stealth fighter planes, aircraft carrier catapult system, landing on Mars..... If it wasn't for US government sanction, Huawei phones may have defeated Apple phones.

Question: Are all US rich and developed allies such as EU and Japan sleeping.
 
. . .
All SpaceX did is more like raising money. Engineers are there. Technologies are there. All trial launches burnt huge amount of money.
Well, both nasa & spaceJunkX rely on state handouts.
Nasa in the form of direct funding, spaceJunkX in the form of $$ printing from the fed.
Nothing wrong with state support per se. If usa thinks making Musk a zillionaire while its people starve from food inflation is ok, then fine for me too.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom