What's new

Declassified Papers Shed Light on US Role in Liaquat’s Murder

mr42O

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 15, 2009
Messages
6,178
Reaction score
4
Country
Pakistan
Location
Norway
khan18_.jpg


ALKHOBAR, 18 July 2006 — Oil, Iran and air bases, seem to be issues of recent times. Not indeed. It was some 55 years back that these issues were very much in play and a recently declassified document indicates that these were the reasons behind the assassination of Liaquat Ali Khan, Pakistan’s first prime minister on Oct. 16, 1951.

Like a number of other high-profile killings, the assassination of Liaquat Ali Khan, has also remained a mystery. Conspiracy theories abound, yet are difficult to substantiate.

A recent declassified document from the US State Department brings to light some interesting facts. According to the document, a telegram was sent by the American Embassy in New Delhi on Oct. 30, 1951.

“Is Liaquat Ali Khan’s assassination a result of a deep-laid American conspiracy?” The telegram from the US Embassy in New Delhi carried the summary of an article published in the Urdu daily of Bhopal, “Nadeem” on Oct. 24, 1951, charging the US with the responsibility of Khan’s death.

The summary then points to the facts raised in the Nadeem article, “It was neither a local incident nor connected with the Pashtoonistan movement (as some may have believed then). It had behind it a deep-rooted conspiracy and recognizable hand.”

The article then says that the then Afghan government “knew about the conspiracy and the assassin was an Afghan, yet, the plot was hatched neither in Kabul nor in Karachi (the then capital of Pakistan).”

The declassified document reveals that the day before assassination, the secretary to the American ambassador in Karachi absent-mindedly jotted down “holiday” for Oct. 19 in a table diary and then immediately struck it off.

Following the secretary’s departure, Mohammad Hussain, a Pakistani employee at the American Embassy in Karachi asked the secretary’s British clerk about the holiday. The clerk described it as a possible slip. “Mistake meaningful,” however, because “the secretary knew the embassy would be closed (on) Oct. 17 (sic) although no American or Pakistani holiday was scheduled then to fall that day.

The story in Nadeem then points to another fact, as given in the declassified document. The American ambassador (in Karachi) offered condolences to Liaquat’s wife (Raana Liaquat Ali Khan) on the phone, some three and a half minutes before even the Governor General of Pakistan Khawaja Nazimuddin managed to offer his condolences. This was despite the fact that the governor general was the first to be informed (of the killing) by the Rawalpindi authorities. Indeed with no mobile connection, no live transmissions, even no TV, those were different days and the flow of information was much slower than today. The question that the newspaper article thus tried to raise was how did the American ambassador come to know of the assassination before the governor general of Pakistan found out?

The newspaper article, as summarized by the declassified US document, then discusses the possible reason for the disenchantment of the US and the UK governments with the Pakistan prime minister and his government. Liaquat was not ready to toe the US line, the newspaper pointed out and hence the US wanted him eliminated.

“While the UK was pressing Pakistan for support on the issue of Iran, the US demanded Pakistan use its influence in Tehran and persuade it to transfer control of its oil fields to the US (oil apparently has remained a major issue with the Americans ever since, especially while Mohammad Mosaddeq was in power in Tehran then).

According to the article, Liaquat Ali Khan declined to accede to the request. “The US then threatened to annul the secret pact on Kashmir (between Pakistan and the US). Liaquat replied that Pakistan has annexed half of Kashmir without American support and would be able to take the other half too.” Not only that, Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan also demanded that the US vacate air bases in Pakistan.

“Liaquat’s demand was a bombshell for Washington. Americans who had been dreaming of conquering Soviet Russia from Pakistan air bases were flabbergasted,” the article emphasized. And hence the plot to kill Liaquat was hatched, says the article.

However, “the US wanted a Muslim assassin, so as to obviate international complications. The US could not find a traitor in Pakistan (apparently for the reason that the new country was then brimming with nationalistic pride and hope for future),” the article added.

The US then turned to Kabul. “Washington contacted the US Embassy in Kabul. They in turn got in touch with Pashtoonistan leaders, pointing to Liaquat as their only hurdle and assuring them that if some of them could kill Liaquat, the US would undertake the task of establishing Pashtoonistan by 1952.”

At this the “Pashtoon leaders induced Akbar to take the job and also made arrangements for him to be killed immediately after so as to conceal the conspiracy. The Pakistani currency recovered from the assassin’s body also reveal that others were also involved. Due to already strained relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan no currency exchange was then taking place between the two countries. Hence only the “American Embassy (in Kabul) could have supplied the Pakistani currency notes to the assassin,” the summary argued.

The article also mentioned that the cartridges recovered from the body of the assassinated Pakistani premier were US made. The type of bullet used to kill the Pakistani prime minister were in “use by high-ranking American officers”, and were “not usually available in the market”. The rest is for us to deduce.

The article then summarized that all these facts prove that the real culprit behind the killing was the US, which had committed similar acts in the Middle East as well.

There are many parallels between then and now. And all this could not be just a matter of chance. Oil, assassinations, dollars, Iran, air bases, all these sound familiar even today. Fifty years have passed, yet things may not have really changed.

Declassified Papers Shed Light on US Role in Liaquat’s Murder
 
American has killed

1. Dr Liaquat Ali Khan ( only member left from Qaid e Azam team )
2. Bhutto
3. Zia
4. Benazir Bhutto ( She rejeted to meet Americans they day she got killed )
5. Imran Khan is next traget

Read John Perkins book Economic Hitman about how CIA works
 
Guys we all know Liaquat Ali Khan was killed due to Iran.
Us wants air base in Gwadar, they want pakistan to attack Iran with the help of US to control the Baluchistan region.
The reason is OIL, they want an access to the central Asian states through that area.
I had done some research on the Baluchistan, i find that the land below the surface of the earth are in such a way that if you build refinery on the Baluchistan region then this refinery will suck all the OIL due to slope which moves downwards to the Baluchistan area in Pakistan.
 
Sounds like a poorly written article. Its based on a US cable sent from Delhi to US authorities in the US basically summarising an article written in a Urdu daily in Bhopal, central India.

And it happily presents the claims made in that article as ''facts''!!! But since its America...
 
........................
I had done some research on the Baluchistan, i find that the land below the surface of the earth are in such a way that if you build refinery on the Baluchistan region then this refinery will suck all the OIL due to slope which moves downwards to the Baluchistan area in Pakistan.

Refineries don't "suck" oil; they "refine" oil. Even oil wells don't suck oil; it needs to either flow up under natural pressure, or in mature wells needs to be pressurized to come up. Oil does not flow in layers of geostrata, but is contained in stationary pockets and dome like structures most commonly.

Please do some more research before you spout off such patently erroneous statements.
 
Sounds like a poorly written article. Its based on a US cable sent from Delhi to US authorities in the US basically summarising an article written in a Urdu daily in Bhopal, central India.

And it happily presents the claims made in that article as ''facts''!!! But since its America...

This is first time i read some were but i have known that always... He rejected USA and got killed. He wanted tie with Russia not USA. The bullet used wasnt in Pakistan and only used by Americans.
 
Since Raymond Davis case goverment has controlled movement of all forginers. They need visa to each city and must go to police station to report in that city every day. We say every day americans stopped by police in embassy cars from other than UK and USA. They were stopped in private cars etc etc. After some weeks when most americans were kicked out terror activty went down like 2 3 blast in a month rather than one every day. And now there has no been any major terror attack.

What was caught from Raymond davis ? Pictures of places that were target for terrorists . picture of army bunkers etc. We saw how american told Pakistanies he isnt CIA or blackwater etc. When he goes back no case was runned against him as promised media start telling he was CIA. So CIA is active in Pakistan and they have been behind many bombings.

Why there wasnt NO SUCIDE BOMBING in Iraq , Pakistan and Afghanistan before USA come ? And we know group supported by USA did terror attack in Iran.

USA is bigges criminal in the world who only want power noting else.... now USA is begging Taliban to left them alone soon Americans will beg for friends in the world as its going for them
 
Refineries don't "suck" oil; they "refine" oil. Even oil wells don't suck oil; it needs to either flow up under natural pressure, or in mature wells needs to be pressurized to come up. Oil does not flow in layers of geostrata, but is contained in stationary pockets and dome like structures most commonly.

Please do some more research before you spout off such patently erroneous statements.
what ever he is saying is true in a sense that the baloch is a low area while iran is higher area a classic case of saudi somalia proxy war the reality is that the oil tends to flow from higher to lowere area if allowed to do so and this case is no different it can be made thorough the region
 
what ever he is saying is true in a sense that the baloch is a low area while iran is higher area a classic case of saudi somalia proxy war the reality is that the oil tends to flow from higher to lowere area if allowed to do so and this case is no different it can be made thorough the region

Crude oil is not "allowed" to flow as you describe by natural geology.

Your contention is simply wrong.
 
Crude oil is not "allowed" to flow as you describe by natural geology.

Your contention is simply wrong.

I think this applies here:


lol
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Crude oil is not "allowed" to flow as you describe by natural geology.

Your contention is simply wrong.

LOL, Trolling at its best... topic is about Liaquat’s Murder, so can you guys stick to it...
Fact is USA playing dirty games in this region.....
 
LOL, Trolling at its best... topic is about Liaquat’s Murder, so can you guys stick to it...
Fact is USA playing dirty games in this region.....

............... but those "dirty games" do NOT include the prevention of "sucking up" oil! Hence my posts. :D
 
I don't what "Declassified Papers" the writer has used , but the ones i could find , suggest that US had little to do with his assassination.

0000010596_0001.gif


0000010596_0003.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom