Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's sad. Farsi should be made part of the curriculum, it's part of our shared history.
Urdu, Farsi, English, Arabic, Punjabi/Pushto/Sindhi ... these are children, not computers. Children should only be taught their mother tongue + urdu until college. Then they can pick up others as needed.That's sad. Farsi should be made part of the curriculum, it's part of our shared history.
Persian influence in Urdu is huge and even the national anthem of Pakistan is in Persian.. in fact, even Pakistan, the name, is Persian in origin. It should be made the second language in Pakistan, after Urdu.Urdu, Farsi, English, Arabic, Punjabi/Pushto/Sindhi ... these are children, not computers. Children should only be taught their mother tongue + urdu until college. Then they can pick up others as needed.
Urdu, Farsi, English, Arabic, Punjabi/Pushto/Sindhi ... these are children, not computers. Children should only be taught their mother tongue + urdu until college. Then they can pick up others as needed.
Children learn and pick up languages very fast at a young age.
What does modern day Pakistan has to do with fire worshipper's language?
Too late for that now lol, especially in the information age.It would've made sense to adopt Farsi as the national language instead of Urdu. Why? Because the Mughal court language was actually Farsi. Heck, Farsi was even the court language in Bengal at one point. Moreover, adopting Farsi would've raised more of a barrier between us and the Hindustan mainstream culture.
Either Farsi or Arabic should've been the way forward (ideally both as it would've enabled us to build bridges with both the Arab and Iran-Afghan world). For all those who wanted to erect a civilizational divide between Pakistan and India, then adopting Farsi would've been the logical choice. This was the language of the Muslim rulers who conquered and settled in these lands after the Arabs, and, at one point, governed most of South Asia with it.
We did a crap job appropriating the Muslim civilizations of South Asia. If there was one thing we should've learned from India, it was culturally linking back to a 1,000-year legacy. Instead, we tried this patchwork identity building combining Urdu and English gentry culture. We literally had a civilization to adopt, and we didn't do it.
PS: I say this as someone whose grandparents came from Hyderabad-Deccan, so I have nothing against Urdu. However, I know that my ancestors spoke Farsi way back when, and in all likelihood, as did the rulers of Punjab, Sindh, KP, Baluchistan, and the Bengal. Farsi was the language of Muslim rule in South Asia.
@JamD please add this to my "how to re-engineer Pakistan" list. Thanks.
It would've made sense to adopt Farsi as the national language instead of Urdu. Why? Because the Mughal court language was actually Farsi. Heck, Farsi was even the court language in Bengal at one point. Moreover, adopting Farsi would've raised more of a barrier between us and the Hindustan mainstream culture.
Either Farsi or Arabic should've been the way forward (ideally both as it would've enabled us to build bridges with both the Arab and Iran-Afghan world).
PS: I say this as someone whose grandparents came from Hyderabad-Deccan.
What does modern day Pakistan has to do with fire worshipper's language?
Too late for that now lol, especially in the information age.
But if a language were to be chosen in hindsight, it would've been better to use Punjabi but add Pashto/Sindhi/Baloch/Dardic/Hindi words.