Dear Offended India, Aamir Khan Is Not A Star Because Of Your Charity

[HariPrasad]

It was secular nation and our constitution guaranteed that between 1947-1976, Weren't Indians granted equal rights irrespective of their religion in our constitution long before the word secularism was added. There were no major amendments to constitution in 1976....

No Minorities have special rights which Majority do not have.

 

[ranjeet]

Did you forget Akhlaq? He was lucky to be out their reach...

Do you have details of the case or just the narrative that's been fed to you?

 

[The_Showstopper]

No Minorities have special rights which Majority do not have.

Please provide some examples...

Do you have details of the case or just the narrative that's been fed to you?

What details do you want?

 

[ranjeet]

What details do you want?

UP government didn't mentioned beef or communal angle in their report sent to MHA. If you want to peddle the narrative then please go ahead.

 

[GodToons]

Dear Offended India, Aamir Khan Is Not A Star Because Of Your Charity
Posted: 26/11/2015 20:34 IST Updated: 26/11/2015 22:08 IST

Oscar-winning music composer A.R Rahman uttered, when asked to comment on the furore that followed Aamir Khan's remarks on the much-debated streak of religious supremacy in the country.

Now, what does it say when a renowned public figure--a citizen of a free country--feel voicing his opinion would mean courting trouble?

One needs to look no further than the experience of Aamir Khan to understand why. In the three days that followed the publication of Khan's interview with The Indian Express' Anant Goenka, the actor has been swiftly tried on social media and in the dissent-intolerant political cliques, and has been pronounced anti-national extraordinaire.

The company he is a brand ambassador for bent over backwards to keep its fleeing flock together and immediately distanced itself from Khan's comments, saying: "Snapdeal is a proud Indian company built by passionate young Indians focused on building an inclusive digital India." How being a 'proud Indian company' must be in exclusion of agreeing with Khan's remarks is a question Snapdeal should have asked itself.

But right now, all's fair in love for India and war against Aamir Khan.

Also Read: An Open Letter To Aamir Khan



Some Hindu Sena activists also turned up at Khan's doorstep, howling and shouting,demanding an apology. And when it didn't draw one, Shiv Sena stepped in. First it asked Khan to release his films outside India. Then the Punjab chapter of the party gathered in front of the hotel Khan has put up at in Ludhiana and announced that they will reward anyone who slaps Khan, with Rs1 lakh.

So here's what Khan has earned in the past three days in the country of his birth, where he has lived and worked all his life, where he has broken no law: deeply personal insults, threat of physical violence and economic boycott.

And those are perhaps trivial misfortunes he has faced, compared to what a section of the country has been trying to assert: that he is Aamir Khan, a man who earns his living in India, because of the charitable nature of the Hindu majority of the country. That he has a family, with a Hindu wife not because our constitution grants him the same rights as any citizen, but because the Hindu majority decided to not crack down upon him. UP BJP chief Laxmikant Bajpayee declared that if India was an intolerant country, Khan would have not been able to marry a Hindu woman. Does he think a woman has any agency in the matter? Don't ask.

A BJP MP from Madhya Pradesh claimed that if India was intolerant, Aamir Khan 'would be working on any shop fixing punctured tyres'. This echoed what BJP MP Yogi Adityanath said when Shahrukh Khan dared to say intolerance was rising in India.

It's as if half the country on social media decided to jump out of their closet of civility to show a Muslim actor where they think he belongs--in the fringes, on the allowance of the gracious majority.

Also read: Here's Aamir's Perfect Response To The Furore Over His Remarks



If Aamir Khan is not a mechanic mending tyres, he only has his own talent to thank and the country's constitution, which the new crop of Hindu supremacists had no contribution in drafting.

A star of his box-office heft, suddenly Khan is faced with the idea that his stardom rests solely on the kindness of the Hindu majority of the country. "We made you a star," they hollered, in Facebook posts and Twitter rants. But here's the thing, Aamir Khan, Shah Rukh Khan, or for that matter, any performing artist's success doesn't depend on charity. Unlike the victories of political leaders in our country, they earn every bit of the success attributed to them. They are as good as the box office collections of their last release.

The argument 'we didn't care about your surname while watching your film' is an empty one. We watch films for ourselves, often as a distraction from the daily drudgery of our lives and not because we care about the well-being of the people who made the film. Aamir Khan and Shah Rukh Khan are stars because they are entertainers loved by millions, considered worthy of the ticket price people pay to watch them. They can actually claim to have delivered the occasional tangible 'achche din' in our humdrum lives. And when they didn't, their films bombed, having direct consequences for their careers and bank balances.

And what have we essentially paid to be entertained by? These Muslim actors, obliging every Hindu majoritarian fantasy, by playing alpha Hindu men who are noble, smart, talented, religious, romantic and oh-so-awesome, often fantastic slayers of Muslim thugs with names appended with the word 'bhai'. The moment Aamir Khan did something mildly critical of the religious majority with PK, people turned up at theatres with clubs and hockey sticks in protest. So attributing Aamir Khan's success to your pluralism is rich.

Aamir Khan is not your tolerance project. Get over him, read the constitution--today is a good day to do it.


Dear Offended India, Aamir Khan Is Not A Star Because Of Your Charity

Everybody has right to have their point of view as given by Indian constitution. While Aamir khan can express under name of Freedom of Speech, do not undermine rights of common person point of view, who do not agree with this reel star, in name of #Intolerance.

Bullshit article to in my point of view

 

[jamahir]

It's as if half the country on social media decided to jump out of their closet of civility to show a Muslim actor where they think he belongs--in the fringes, on the allowance of the gracious majority.

the same half-the-country was silent when yogi adityanath exhorted his viraat followers to dig up muslim female graves and rape them.

the same half-the-country was silent when baba ramdev lied that since aamir could marry kiran india had great "tolerance", while everyone knows about ramdev's terrorist associates heaping atrocities upon hindu-muslim couples who want to marry or just go about.

--in the fringes, on the allowance of the gracious majority.

i wonder what would babur, akbar and tipu would have said about being gracious.

 

[The_Showstopper]

UP government didn't mentioned beef or communal angle in their report sent to MHA. If you want to peddle the narrative then please go ahead.

I can literally post many news articles which showed where and who started the beef narrative, Infact many Sanghis on PDF were going along with the narrative and I am sure you must have posted or atleast liked one such post... So please don't be a hypocrite...

 

[ranjeet]

I can literally post many news articles which showed where and who started the beef narrative, Infact many Sanghis on PDF were going along with the narrative and I am sure you must have posted or atleast liked one such post... So please don't be a hypocrite...

News articles? Sanghis on PDF? whats all that has to do with Akhlaq?

 

[The_Showstopper]

News articles? Sanghis on PDF? whats all that has to do with Akhlaq?

This....
Controversial Statements by BJP Leaders on Dadri Lynching Incident -The New Indian Express
Six Outrageous Things BJP Leaders Have Said About Dadri Murder Over Beef

 

[Kaniska]

This....
Controversial Statements by BJP Leaders on Dadri Lynching Incident -The New Indian Express
Six Outrageous Things BJP Leaders Have Said About Dadri Murder Over Beef

Dadri murder is a blot on humanity....But that does not discount the fact that the question mark remains with the loyality of Muslim stars of Bollywood..One wrong does not make another wrong as a correct thing..

 

[The_Showstopper]

Dadri murder is a blot on humanity....But that does not discount the fact that the question mark remains with the loyality of Muslim stars of Bollywood..One wrong does not make another wrong as a correct thing..

So what loyalty do you speak of? When Kamal Hasan spoke of leaving India couple of years of ago over a controversy, no one pounced on him, so why now? Is because they are "Muslim stars"?

 

[Kaniska]

So what loyalty do you speak of? When Kamal Hasan spoke of leaving India couple of years of ago over a controversy, no one pounced on him, so why now? Is because they are "Muslim stars"?

It is not just because they are Muslim stars...but because, they try to be more loyal to become a Muslim than Indian...I do not have any problem...if Amir has told BJP is bad ..or bla..bla...because BJP is not a nation..This time BJP will be in power and next month..some one else...But when he shown his character by putting whole nation as a fanatic nation, then it think he is just behaving as some typical Muslim fanatic than a Ameer Khan to whom we loved...

 

[The_Showstopper]

It is not just because they are Muslim stars...but because, they try to be more loyal to become a Muslim than Indian...I do not have any problem...if Amir has told BJP is bad ..or bla..bla...because BJP is not a nation..This time BJP will be in power and next month..some one else...But when he shown his character by putting whole nation as a fanatic nation, then it think he is just behaving as some typical Muslim fanatic than a Ameer Khan to whom we loved...

LOL... So where did he say that the whole nation is fanatic?

 

[Kaniska]

LOL... So where did he say that the whole nation is fanatic?

You are trying to be so naive...Keep it up with your innocence..I like it..

 

[The_Showstopper]

You are trying to be so naive...Keep it up with your innocence..I like it..

Show me the proof of what you just claimed... If you can't then don't just make empty claims.