What's new

Dear Offended India, Aamir Khan Is Not A Star Because Of Your Charity

I do know that there constitutional remedies to stop such acts but were they right in the first place?


Oh...! So you mean this way?
12289613_10153234436323372_1348093061152555983_n.jpg


Anyways jokes apart, Is harming him physically the appropriate way in your opinion?
who is harming him physically? kuch bhi?

Dear amir khan, ... but minorities are always intolerant..

Glad you admitted it, took it a while but finally you confessed it.
 
. . .
I do know that there constitutional remedies to stop such acts but were they right in the first place?


Oh...! So you mean this way?
12289613_10153234436323372_1348093061152555983_n.jpg


Anyways jokes apart, Is harming him physically the appropriate way in your opinion?

Fanatic Muslim on rampage.

images

images


It is a fashion to depict Hindus as violant. Can you tell any name of Muslim celebrity who was either killed or hurt by your so called Hindu fundamentalist. It is muslims who waives Pakistani and ISIS flags in country. It is they who openly advocate for Pakistan. They openly threaten to kill 100 cr Hindus. surprisingly, you do not see anything wrong there but come here with an irrelevant picture to depict Hindus as fanatic. Infact, Muslims are the most fanatic people in the world who kills thousand of people everyday. Rather than being ashamed of that or opposing that, you always defend them shamelessly. This strengthen our belief that it is virtually very difficult to find any moderate Muslim.
 
.
Jhoota kahika, Hindu biwi chahiye, Hindu fans chahiye, hinudo ka majak uadatha hai, who said he is a super star, the one and only super star is rajnikanth and kamalhasan, there are many many greater stars than him, he copied gajini and became famous. We don't need this joker who is employed by Hindu producers and directors, and those who think Bollywood is the only film industry are Nieve southern movies are technical Cally and qualitatively superior, and these stupid actors call themselves as all india stars.
 
.
SRK and Aamir Khan shot themselves in the foot this time.There is a huge mobilization of support against these Khan anti-National remarks,so much that Snapdeal felt the heat overnight its business went down several notches.They immediately issued a statement distancing themselves from Amir and he too issued a apology of sorts next day.SRK also did a u-turn keeping in mind the spill over effect the mobilization of boycotting products they endorse will have on his about to be released movie "Dilwale" Now he is busy wooing people by painting himself as a patriot. But the damage to their image and brand value is already done a whooping 85% of India voted against Amir in a TOI poll.That means they will keep that in mind and won't be forgetting these remarks anytime soon.
Tata Sky changed their Ambassador to Kangana Ranaut instead of Amir khan,shows no brand wants to risk losing business over stupid actors POV.
 
. .
What was India between 1947 - 1976 then ? a non-secular nation ?
It was secular nation and our constitution guaranteed that between 1947-1976, Weren't Indians granted equal rights irrespective of their religion in our constitution long before the word secularism was added. There were no major amendments to constitution in 1976....

I hope this video helps you. watch from 0.50 secs where modi explains the hindu ethos and how this nation respected the religious beliefs of other citizens..

Do you really want me to believe what Mr Modi says, His actions speaks for him.. All of his minion ministers and other "fringe elements" speak for him...

what does secularism has to do with dalits ??
Why were Dalits not treated as equals if there was secularism in our past...?

who is harming him physically? kuch bhi?
Did you forget Akhlaq? He was lucky to be out their reach...

So what if its written by indian hindu ?
Anything written by indian hindu is gospel of truth for you ?
Not necessarily but he/she has a point, I am forced to bring the author's religious identity because of the word "Offended India" in title. Sanghis would have gone berserk with names like "traitor", "Pakistani" had it been a muslim name...
 
.
It was secular nation and our constitution guaranteed that between 1947-1976, Weren't Indians granted equal rights irrespective of their religion in our constitution long before the word secularism was added. There were no major amendments to constitution in 1976....

That was in reference to the author, who is advising others to read the constitution that describes India as a secular nation, none of us have any qualms over it. India was secular even before the secular word was added to the constitution and the nation remains secular till the Hindu majority of this nation are not radicalized. The day when significant majority of Hindus want this nation to turn in to a Hindu country, no power on earth will stop it and the so called constitution shall be re-written acc. to the whims of Hindus,it may sound harsh but, this is the reality .

Do you really want me to believe what Mr Modi says, His actions speaks for him.. All of his minion ministers and other "fringe elements" speak for him...
Did any of the fringe cause harm to the nation ?? unlike radicals of other religions Hindu extremists are are only good with words.
Why were Dalits not treated as equals if there was secularism in our past...?
It has nothing to do with secularism. It is the evil mindset of humans to rule and exert power over other humans that resulted in the mistreatment of dalits.[/QUOTE]
 
.
That was in reference to the author, who is advising others to read the constitution that describes India as a secular nation, none of us have any qualms over it. India was secular even before the secular word was added to the constitution and the nation remains secular till the Hindu majority of this nation are not radicalized. The day when significant majority of Hindus want this nation to turn in to a Hindu country, no power on earth will stop it and the so called constitution shall be re-written acc. to the whims of Hindus,it may sound harsh but, this is the reality .
What you say could have been true had the population within Hindus were homogeneous. But that's not the case, we have some people within hinduism who worship Ram and some Ravan, some worship cow and some slaughter it, You and me know that India is unified because of our very constitution, the day you decide to do away with it and bring a homogeneous rule which caters to select few, we will have to start worrying about our country's integrity.

Did any of the fringe cause harm to the nation ?? unlike radicals of other religions Hindu extremists are are only good with words.
What about the riots, attacks and killings instigated and committed by these fringe elements? Are they not harming our nation?

It has nothing to do with secularism. It is the evil mindset of humans to rule and exert power over other humans that resulted in the mistreatment of dalits.
[/QUOTE]
Yes agreed but when you claimed that secularism existed long before the constitution was in place, here I wanted to know your opinion on the ill-treatment of Dalits(As secular state will claim all its citizens to be equal irrespective of their religious affiliation)..
 
Last edited:
.
Oscar-winning music composer A.R Rahman uttered, when asked to comment on the furore that followed Aamir Khan's remarks on the much-debated streak of religious supremacy in the country.

What does AR Rahman uttered -- Anything different then that once he also faces problems because his Song has problem to Muslims. That song was Chaiya Chaiya I suppose, where the word Jannat was used, and that was offending.

One needs to look no further than the experience of Aamir Khan to understand why. In the three days that followed the publication of Khan's interview with The Indian Express' Anant Goenka, the actor has been swiftly tried on social media and in the dissent-intolerant political cliques, and has been pronounced anti-national extraordinaire.

Better you understand how to open your mouth and where to open your mouth is better for you and Amir Khan should take lesson from that. This is the age of the Social media, twitter, news media, paid media, gossips, and they all are used as a weapon. Just look if you want to attack Modi/BJP, don't attack his foreign policies, projects, plans but attack using those weapons to make them look like anti-Muslim and make the people feels that the Muslims are now in the verge of extintion and they have to fight their last battle to survive, and to target Congress just attack Sonia gandhi Damad, Rahul Foriegn trip, nothing else.

Ok just one word Secular ---- It means equality to every section of the society, and culture and is there any need for using Religion in it. That what Home minister Rajnath said in the parliament, and then few members of parliament on oppositions got excited, and starts shouting.
 
.
I give AR Rahman credit, he actually has talent. However, Bollywood is cottage industry. Almost every actor is connected thru family and friend relations. A bunch of fake, no talent, clueless actors who only got into the industry due to their connections. Take a closer look if you don't believe me. As for Aamir Khan.....he is a humble guy but his acting sucks big time.
 
.
He said "Intolerance is on the rise" and never said that "India is intolerant", so dude please differentiate between the two.

A half truth is a full lie.

What is his definition of intolerance and rise in tolerance when compared to what?

What he is doing is capitalizing on the love and affection shown by the people of India to degrade India. This is nothing but a big stab in the back on the people who have supported him and his family for decades. He is a big traitor. Who needs enemies when you have citizens like this.
 
.
aamirpk.jpg

Where else can he be a superstar other than India with a height of 5.4ft and long and elephant like ears
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom