What's new

Dear Offended India, Aamir Khan Is Not A Star Because Of Your Charity

The_Showstopper

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
6,708
Reaction score
-3
Country
India
Location
India
Dear Offended India, Aamir Khan Is Not A Star Because Of Your Charity
Posted: 26/11/2015 20:34 IST Updated: 26/11/2015 22:08 IST
n-AAMIR-KHAN-large570.jpg


Oscar-winning music composer A.R Rahman uttered, when asked to comment on the furore that followed Aamir Khan's remarks on the much-debated streak of religious supremacy in the country.

Now, what does it say when a renowned public figure--a citizen of a free country--feel voicing his opinion would mean courting trouble?

One needs to look no further than the experience of Aamir Khan to understand why. In the three days that followed the publication of Khan's interview with The Indian Express' Anant Goenka, the actor has been swiftly tried on social media and in the dissent-intolerant political cliques, and has been pronounced anti-national extraordinaire.

The company he is a brand ambassador for bent over backwards to keep its fleeing flock together and immediately distanced itself from Khan's comments, saying: "Snapdeal is a proud Indian company built by passionate young Indians focused on building an inclusive digital India." How being a 'proud Indian company' must be in exclusion of agreeing with Khan's remarks is a question Snapdeal should have asked itself.

But right now, all's fair in love for India and war against Aamir Khan.

Also Read: An Open Letter To Aamir Khan



Some Hindu Sena activists also turned up at Khan's doorstep, howling and shouting,demanding an apology. And when it didn't draw one, Shiv Sena stepped in. First it asked Khan to release his films outside India. Then the Punjab chapter of the party gathered in front of the hotel Khan has put up at in Ludhiana and announced that they will reward anyone who slaps Khan, with Rs1 lakh.

So here's what Khan has earned in the past three days in the country of his birth, where he has lived and worked all his life, where he has broken no law: deeply personal insults, threat of physical violence and economic boycott.

And those are perhaps trivial misfortunes he has faced, compared to what a section of the country has been trying to assert: that he is Aamir Khan, a man who earns his living in India, because of the charitable nature of the Hindu majority of the country. That he has a family, with a Hindu wife not because our constitution grants him the same rights as any citizen, but because the Hindu majority decided to not crack down upon him. UP BJP chief Laxmikant Bajpayee declared that if India was an intolerant country, Khan would have not been able to marry a Hindu woman. Does he think a woman has any agency in the matter? Don't ask.

A BJP MP from Madhya Pradesh claimed that if India was intolerant, Aamir Khan 'would be working on any shop fixing punctured tyres'. This echoed what BJP MP Yogi Adityanath said when Shahrukh Khan dared to say intolerance was rising in India.

It's as if half the country on social media decided to jump out of their closet of civility to show a Muslim actor where they think he belongs--in the fringes, on the allowance of the gracious majority.

Also read: Here's Aamir's Perfect Response To The Furore Over His Remarks



If Aamir Khan is not a mechanic mending tyres, he only has his own talent to thank and the country's constitution, which the new crop of Hindu supremacists had no contribution in drafting.

A star of his box-office heft, suddenly Khan is faced with the idea that his stardom rests solely on the kindness of the Hindu majority of the country. "We made you a star," they hollered, in Facebook posts and Twitter rants. But here's the thing, Aamir Khan, Shah Rukh Khan, or for that matter, any performing artist's success doesn't depend on charity. Unlike the victories of political leaders in our country, they earn every bit of the success attributed to them. They are as good as the box office collections of their last release.

The argument 'we didn't care about your surname while watching your film' is an empty one. We watch films for ourselves, often as a distraction from the daily drudgery of our lives and not because we care about the well-being of the people who made the film. Aamir Khan and Shah Rukh Khan are stars because they are entertainers loved by millions, considered worthy of the ticket price people pay to watch them. They can actually claim to have delivered the occasional tangible 'achche din' in our humdrum lives. And when they didn't, their films bombed, having direct consequences for their careers and bank balances.

And what have we essentially paid to be entertained by? These Muslim actors, obliging every Hindu majoritarian fantasy, by playing alpha Hindu men who are noble, smart, talented, religious, romantic and oh-so-awesome, often fantastic slayers of Muslim thugs with names appended with the word 'bhai'. The moment Aamir Khan did something mildly critical of the religious majority with PK, people turned up at theatres with clubs and hockey sticks in protest. So attributing Aamir Khan's success to your pluralism is rich.

Aamir Khan is not your tolerance project. Get over him, read the constitution--today is a good day to do it.


Dear Offended India, Aamir Khan Is Not A Star Because Of Your Charity
 
These Muslim actors, obliging every Hindu majoritarian fantasy, by playing alpha Hindu men who are noble, smart, talented, religious, romantic and oh-so-awesome, often fantastic slayers of Muslim thugs with names appended with the word 'bhai'.

What sort of victim playing is this ?
 
of course he's a businessman of film Industry, and just like any business field, customer is a king here ;)
 
Dear Offended India, Aamir Khan Is Not A Star Because Of Your Charity
Posted: 26/11/2015 20:34 IST Updated: 26/11/2015 22:08 IST
n-AAMIR-KHAN-large570.jpg


Oscar-winning music composer A.R Rahman uttered, when asked to comment on the furore that followed Aamir Khan's remarks on the much-debated streak of religious supremacy in the country.

Now, what does it say when a renowned public figure--a citizen of a free country--feel voicing his opinion would mean courting trouble?

One needs to look no further than the experience of Aamir Khan to understand why. In the three days that followed the publication of Khan's interview with The Indian Express' Anant Goenka, the actor has been swiftly tried on social media and in the dissent-intolerant political cliques, and has been pronounced anti-national extraordinaire.

The company he is a brand ambassador for bent over backwards to keep its fleeing flock together and immediately distanced itself from Khan's comments, saying: "Snapdeal is a proud Indian company built by passionate young Indians focused on building an inclusive digital India." How being a 'proud Indian company' must be in exclusion of agreeing with Khan's remarks is a question Snapdeal should have asked itself.

But right now, all's fair in love for India and war against Aamir Khan.

Also Read: An Open Letter To Aamir Khan



Some Hindu Sena activists also turned up at Khan's doorstep, howling and shouting,demanding an apology. And when it didn't draw one, Shiv Sena stepped in. First it asked Khan to release his films outside India. Then the Punjab chapter of the party gathered in front of the hotel Khan has put up at in Ludhiana and announced that they will reward anyone who slaps Khan, with Rs1 lakh.

So here's what Khan has earned in the past three days in the country of his birth, where he has lived and worked all his life, where he has broken no law: deeply personal insults, threat of physical violence and economic boycott.

And those are perhaps trivial misfortunes he has faced, compared to what a section of the country has been trying to assert: that he is Aamir Khan, a man who earns his living in India, because of the charitable nature of the Hindu majority of the country. That he has a family, with a Hindu wife not because our constitution grants him the same rights as any citizen, but because the Hindu majority decided to not crack down upon him. UP BJP chief Laxmikant Bajpayee declared that if India was an intolerant country, Khan would have not been able to marry a Hindu woman. Does he think a woman has any agency in the matter? Don't ask.

A BJP MP from Madhya Pradesh claimed that if India was intolerant, Aamir Khan 'would be working on any shop fixing punctured tyres'. This echoed what BJP MP Yogi Adityanath said when Shahrukh Khan dared to say intolerance was rising in India.

It's as if half the country on social media decided to jump out of their closet of civility to show a Muslim actor where they think he belongs--in the fringes, on the allowance of the gracious majority.

Also read: Here's Aamir's Perfect Response To The Furore Over His Remarks



If Aamir Khan is not a mechanic mending tyres, he only has his own talent to thank and the country's constitution, which the new crop of Hindu supremacists had no contribution in drafting.

A star of his box-office heft, suddenly Khan is faced with the idea that his stardom rests solely on the kindness of the Hindu majority of the country. "We made you a star," they hollered, in Facebook posts and Twitter rants. But here's the thing, Aamir Khan, Shah Rukh Khan, or for that matter, any performing artist's success doesn't depend on charity. Unlike the victories of political leaders in our country, they earn every bit of the success attributed to them. They are as good as the box office collections of their last release.

The argument 'we didn't care about your surname while watching your film' is an empty one. We watch films for ourselves, often as a distraction from the daily drudgery of our lives and not because we care about the well-being of the people who made the film. Aamir Khan and Shah Rukh Khan are stars because they are entertainers loved by millions, considered worthy of the ticket price people pay to watch them. They can actually claim to have delivered the occasional tangible 'achche din' in our humdrum lives. And when they didn't, their films bombed, having direct consequences for their careers and bank balances.

And what have we essentially paid to be entertained by? These Muslim actors, obliging every Hindu majoritarian fantasy, by playing alpha Hindu men who are noble, smart, talented, religious, romantic and oh-so-awesome, often fantastic slayers of Muslim thugs with names appended with the word 'bhai'. The moment Aamir Khan did something mildly critical of the religious majority with PK, people turned up at theatres with clubs and hockey sticks in protest. So attributing Aamir Khan's success to your pluralism is rich.

Aamir Khan is not your tolerance project. Get over him, read the constitution--today is a good day to do it.


Dear Offended India, Aamir Khan Is Not A Star Because Of Your Charity

Dear Aamir Khan India is Not Shortage of Talent that It will Became Hollow Without You .Many Puny Stars Like You Will Come And Go India Will Be Always Remain As it Is.
Individualism is Not Over Nationalism
 
Dear Aamir Khan India is Not Shortage of Talent that It will Became Hollow Without You .Many Puny Stars Like You Will Come And Go India Will Be Always Remain As it Is.
Individualism is Not Over Nationalism
Indeed India has no shortage of talent and he never claimed that it will become hollow without him, Yes "Puny" Stars will come and go and this applies to everyone not just him... So stop bashing him just because you did not like his recent utterance.
 
Aamir Khan is a star because of Indian General Tolerance where we value and respect his talent.
But if we were intolerant, that we wont watch a Muslim's movie, where would he have been?! The market value of Aamir wont get less because of this incident. Public memory is short.

But what he said is wrong and can never be appreciated. I remember a great article by one Journalist used during US-Iraq war.
Just repeat one threat 100 times, and it becomes 100 times magnified.
 
Indeed India has no shortage of talent and he never claimed that it will become hollow without him, Yes "Puny" Stars will come and go and this applies to everyone not just him... So stop bashing him just because you did not like his recent utterance.
Why not i will it my freedom of speech i disliked whatever he said.
This author is being intolerant of Excepting view's than other so is you its double standard
 
Aamir Khan is a star because of Indian General Tolerance where we value and respect his talent.
But if we were intolerant, that we wont watch a Muslim's movie, where would he have been?! The market value of Aamir wont get less because of this incident. Public memory is short.

But what he said is wrong and can never be appreciated. I remember a great article by one Journalist used during US-Iraq war.
Just repeat one threat 100 times, and it becomes 100 times magnified.
He said "Intolerance is on the rise" and never said that "India is intolerant", so dude please differentiate between the two.
 
I don't like these Cinema People anyway .

They live in their Fantasy Dreams of Reel Life . They don't have an iota of Knowledge about Real India .
They don't give a jack to common people like us .
 
Why not i will it my freedom of speech i disliked whatever he said.
This author is being intolerant of Excepting view's than other so is you its double standard
You are free are express your opinion, the constitution has given you the right, so was it given to Aamir. No one is hounding you for your opinion but why is he being hounded... Why did the coterie of Hindutva camp started threatening him, some at his house, some wanted him to be slapped?
 
You are free are express your opinion, the constitution has given you the right, so was it given to Aamir. No one is hounding you for your opinion but why is he being hounded... Why did the coterie of Hindutva camp started threatening him, some at his house, some wanted him to be slapped?
So there is constitutional remedies to stop such Acts. IS he been slapped no,or its first time its happening. I have see similar protest during Tasleema Nasreen Story but the difference was only in colour saffron was substituted with Green
 
You are free are express your opinion, the constitution has given you the right, so was it given to Aamir. No one is hounding you for your opinion but why is he being hounded... Why did the coterie of Hindutva camp started threatening him, some at his house, some wanted him to be slapped?
He will be replied back in appropriate way. Did you hear latest SRK interview?
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom