What's new

Days After Pulwama Attack, Speculation Over Masood Azhar’s ‘Death’

You have not understood religion to speak on it in theological words like righteousness or 'truth'.

they have utter belief in Akhand Bharat. you can downplay this all you like.

90 percent of humans are religious for 10 percent irreligious people. this is a simple observation.

relax. when i meant not to troll i meant not to engage the subject. you cannot troll me. i am a retired troll

Lame reasoning on your part, truth is objective. You can not claim to make an assessment of my knowledge or understanding of any religion, you are not in that position. There are over 4000+ religions in this world and all claims to be "The True Ones". Again I have no interest in discussing religion or religious believes here.

You completely missed my point, I merely stated that idea of Akhand Bharat is factious, and the number of people believing it does not make it as grounded in reality or being true.

Again your observations do not count, unless you are able to back it with demonstrable facts. You can come up with any number you wish, 90,95, 100 or 110, its just a number you decided to make up. Troll or not that is up to you.
 
guess we doing this now

Lame reasoning on your part, truth is objective. You can not claim to make an assessment of my knowledge or understanding of any religion, you are not in that position. There are over 4000+ religions in this world and all claims to be "The True Ones". Again I have no interest in discussing religion or religious believes here.

the words truth and rightful or whatever stem from Religious thought not from irreligious thought.

You have stated your opinion that all religion are equally "unacceptable". this is something all religious people say of everything else apart from their religion.

there can be 7 billion religion in a world of 7 billion. it is a human right.

You completely missed my point, I merely stated that idea of Akhand Bharat is factious, and the number of people believing it does not make it as grounded in reality or being true.

Again your observations do not count, unless you are able to back it with demonstrable facts. You can come up with any number you wish, 90,95, 100 or 110, its just a number you decided to make up. Troll or not that is up to you.

we are not discussing if it is factious or not. it is a motivating factor in regional politics due to it being uncontrolled in a fascist country.

You are obsessed by one number. i can take it back. put any number you like. my argument does not change.
 
the words truth and rightful or whatever stem from Religious thought not from irreligious thought.

You have stated your opinion that all religion are equally "unacceptable". this is something all religious people say of everything else apart from their religion.

there can be 7 billion religion in a world of 7 billion. it is a human right.

Your word Pasta, just went no where. No I stated all religions are equally delusional and factitious. Yes there can be 7 billion religions for 7 billion people, but how will you determine which one is true, as they all claim to be the true ones. You are free to believe as long as your believes do not impede on rights of others.

we are not discussing if it is factious or not. it is a motivating factor in regional politics due to it being uncontrolled in a fascist country.

You are obsessed by one number. i can take it back. put any number you like. my argument does not change.

You seems to be the king of missing the point. Your query was that how can 1 billion people can believe in something which is completely not true as there is no historical reality to that believe. And I stated that humans had and do believe in a lot of things that are not based on truth, either empirical or historical.

On a side note I just realised that my browsers auto-correct had been changing factitious to factious.
 
Your word Pasta, just went no where. No I stated all religions are equally delusional and factitious. Yes there can be 7 billion religions for 7 billion people, but how will you determine which one is true, as they all claim to be the true ones. You are free to believe as long as your believes do not impede on rights of others.

i am not on a truth finding mission to give these certificates. you apparently do by alluding it to nonsense.

for me. your truth is limited to your existence.

You seems to be the king of missing the point. Your query was that how can 1 billion people can believe in something which is completely not true as there is no historical reality to that believe. And I stated that humans had and do believe in a lot of things that are not based on truth, either empirical or historical.

On a side note I just realised that my browsers auto-correct had been changing factitious to factious.

my query was not how. my query is why everyone is missing the elephant in the room that fascism has bred successfully with religious Extremism in India.

i have a new device too. happens
 
News of sickness of jem chief is in news for quite a long time

All things about his death are just speculations
 
i am not on a truth finding mission to give these certificates. you apparently do by alluding it to nonsense.

for me. your truth is limited to your existence.

Sorry but your platitudes doesnt mean anything here.

my query was not how. my query is why everyone is missing the elephant in the room that fascism has bred successfully with religious Extremism in India.

i have a new device too. happens

Of course, they have been brain washed to believe that. Just like Nazis successfully did in Germany. The indoctrination has been going on for decades now, Hinduvta ideology has permeated every level of Indian society. So I am not sure that whats the surprise here for you.
 
Of course, they have been brain washed to believe that. Just like Nazis successfully did in Germany. The indoctrination has been going on for decades now, Hinduvta ideology has permeated every level of Indian society. So I am not sure that whats the surprise here for you.

i am surprised that no one is talking about it
 
How convenient for Pakistan to claim that he was dead.

Indians should not fall for this fake news being put out by Pakistan's ISI.
 
i am surprised that no one is talking about it
I think you already answered your question, since they are not Muslims and Hindu extremism is directed against muslims for the most part, so there is no problem for the world. India is a huge market, and all they are interested in is how to enter it and make money there.

How convenient for Pakistan to claim that he was dead.

Indians should not fall for this fake news being put out by Pakistan's ISI.

I think its the other way around, Indians are the ones which are lapping it up and claiming he was killed as a result of So called strike, as if he was living under one of the bombed trees.
 
I think you already answered your question, since they are not Muslims and Hindu extremism is directed against muslims for the most part, so there is no problem for the world. India is a huge market, and all they are interested in is how to enter it and make money there.

then why are we not getting our piece of pie
 
No i think that was his brother-in-law & some other terrorists in his family.
I'm sure one day you'll kill him too. I have trust in your Airforce. :giggles:
 
Funny you guys still believe in your media and more importantly your government
GOI is far better than GOP when it comes to transparency. When Pak showed captured pilot, our MEA has come out openly and said our pilot is missing in action so that Geneva conventions apply. Any mis adventure on part of Pakistan will back fire. Our Govt doesn't run on misplaced egos or unwarranted machoism.
 
Back
Top Bottom