What's new

Day 1 In Trump's America

alot of liberals work with global citizens who arbitrage and commodify humans as wage slaves and destroy middle class families. Countries will always be poor without high quality and patriotic companies that are loyal to their workers and middle classes of their countries


No, conservatives do that. They support low taxes for the wealthy, a lower minimum wage, less regulation in financial markets, and trade deals that hurt American workers. They're quite open about it. This has led to wages stagnating and to a decline in the middle class, all while income for the wealthiest Americans (top 1-10%) has soared over the past 35 years.

not to a global financier elite


You mean people like Trump?
 
.
No, conservatives do that. They support low taxes for the wealthy, a lower minimum wage, less regulation in financial markets, and trade deals that hurt American workers. They're quite open about it. This has led to wages stagnating and to a decline in the middle class, all while income for the wealthiest Americans (top 1-10%) has soared over the past 35 years.




You mean people like Trump?
You mean trump who has gone into heavy debt and almost went bankrupt in the 1990s? or are you talking about liberals like Clinton who passed NAFTA and placed china into the WTO and de-industrialized the US? How about the Clinton foundation which sells government secrets and does favors to the saudis and foreign powers?
 
.
You mean trump who has gone into heavy debt and almost went bankrupt in the 1990s? or are you talking about liberals like Clinton who passed NAFTA and placed china into the WTO and de-industrialized the US? How about the Clinton foundation which sells government secrets and does favors to the saudis and foreign powers?


I didn't say the Clintons were the champions of the working class either.

But my point was about conservatives:

"They support low taxes for the wealthy, a lower minimum wage, less regulation in financial markets, and trade deals that hurt American workers. They're quite open about it. This has led to wages stagnating and to a decline in the middle class, all while income for the wealthiest Americans (top 1-10%) has soared over the past 35 years."
 
.
You mean trump who has gone into heavy debt and almost went bankrupt in the 1990s? or are you talking about liberals like Clinton who passed NAFTA and placed china into the WTO and de-industrialized the US? How about the Clinton foundation which sells government secrets and does favors to the saudis and foreign powers?
He is from Pakistan so obviously Anti-Trump. Your logic won't work.
 
.
He is from Pakistan so obviously Anti-Trump. Your logic won't work.


I hope you weren't referring to me. Though I am Pakistani-American, I was born and raised in the US.

It's clear from your comment that you don't know anything about US politics, which isn't surprising since you aren't American. Conservatives/Republicans support most of the policies he listed, not liberals. Liberals/Democrats largely oppose them, Though some, like the Clintons, support them too.


Since my "logic" didn't sink in the first time to you, I'll repeat what I said earlier:

Conservatives/Republicans support low taxes for the wealthy, a lower minimum wage, less regulation in financial markets, and trade deals that hurt American workers. And they're quite open about it.
 
.
I hope you weren't referring to me. Though I am Pakistani-American, I was born and raised in the US.

It's clear from your comment that you don't know anything about US politics, which isn't surprising since you aren't American. Conservatives/Republicans support most of the policies he listed, not liberals. Liberals/Democrats largely oppose them, Though some, like the Clintons, support them too.


Since my "logic" didn't sink in the first time to you, I'll repeat what I said earlier:

Conservatives/Republicans support low taxes for the wealthy, a lower minimum wage, less regulation in financial markets, and trade deals that hurt American workers. And they're quite open about it.
Liberals have been profree trade conservatives have been antifree trade
https://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa107.html

Reagan was antitrade and protectionist.

"If President Reagan has a devotion to free trade, it surely must be blind, because he has been off the mark most of the time. Only short memories and a refusal to believe one's own eyes would account for the view that President Reagan is a free trader. Calling oneself a free trader is not the same thing as being a free trader. Nor does a free- trade position mean that the president, but not Congress, should have the power to impose trade sanctions. Instead, a president deserves the title of free trader only if his efforts demonstrate an attempt to remove trade barriers at home and prevent the imposition of new ones.

By this standard, the Reagan administration has failed to promote free trade. Ronald Reagan by his actions has become the most protectionist president since Herbert Hoover, the heavyweight champion of protectionists."

The protrade/globalists have always been liberals. Japan and China joined WTO under clintons. Nafta was signed under clintons. liberals have destroyed unions by selling them out to foreigners.

https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/countries_e/japan_e.htm

Japan and the WTO
This page gathers key information on Japan's participation in the WTO. Japan has been a WTO member since 1 January 1995 and a member of GATT since 10 September 1955.

http://www.manufacturingnews.com/news/10/0615/WTO.html

China's Entry Into The WTO 10 Years Later Is Not What President Clinton Promised
 
.
Liberals have been profree trade conservatives have been antifree trade
https://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa107.html

Reagan was antitrade and protectionist.

"If President Reagan has a devotion to free trade, it surely must be blind, because he has been off the mark most of the time. Only short memories and a refusal to believe one's own eyes would account for the view that President Reagan is a free trader. Calling oneself a free trader is not the same thing as being a free trader. Nor does a free- trade position mean that the president, but not Congress, should have the power to impose trade sanctions. Instead, a president deserves the title of free trader only if his efforts demonstrate an attempt to remove trade barriers at home and prevent the imposition of new ones.

By this standard, the Reagan administration has failed to promote free trade. Ronald Reagan by his actions has become the most protectionist president since Herbert Hoover, the heavyweight champion of protectionists."

The protrade/globalists have always been liberals. Japan and China joined WTO under clintons. Nafta was signed under clintons. liberals have destroyed unions by selling them out to foreigners.


Nothing could be further from the truth. Conservatives are always the ones who are pro-free-trade. They campaign on the issue for goodness sake. Though some liberals do too.

Yes, Reagan increased the number of items that had some restrictions in trade. But, he increased free trade for the most part and reduced regulations, as well as drastically cut taxes on the wealthy. He negotiated the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement and signed it into law. It was Ronald Reagan himself who created the concept of NAFTA as early as 1979 when he spoke of a "North American Accord". He talks about this in his announcement declaring his candidacy for President:


"It is no accident that this unmatched potential for progress and prosperity exists in three countries with such long-standing heritages of free government. A developing closeness among Canada, Mexico and the United States – a North American accord – would permit achievement of that potential in each country beyond that which I believe any of them – strong as they are – could accomplish in the absence of such cooperation."

"By developing methods of working closely together, we will lay the foundations for future cooperation on a broader and more significant scale."

"A developing closeness between the United States, Canada and Mexico would serve notice on friend and foe alike that we were prepared for a long haul, looking outward again and confident our of future; that together we are going to create jobs, to generate new fortunes of wealth for many and provide a legacy for the children of each of our countries.

Now let us work toward the goal of using the assets of this continent, its resources, technology and foodstuffs in the most efficient ways possible for the common good of all its people. It may take the next 100 years but we can dare to dream that at some future date a map of the world might show the North American continent as one in which the peoples and commerce of its three strong countries flow more freely across their present borders than they do toda
y."

https://www.reaganlibrary.archives.gov/archives/reference/11.13.79.html


Reagan negotiated the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement and signed it into law:


"The impetus for NAFTA actually began with President Ronald Reagan, who campaigned on a North American common market.

In 1984, Congress passed the Trade and Tariff Act. That gave the President "fast-track" authority to negotiate free trade agreements more freely. That's because it restricts Congressional input to the ability to approve or disapprove. Congress lost the ability to change negotiating points.

Canadian Prime Minister Mulroney agreed with Reagan to begin negotiations for the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. It was signed in 1988, went into effect in 1989."



And he sure enough, he continued to support the idea of North American agreement as well. From his State of the Union speech in 1988:


"One of the greatest contributions the US can make to the world is to promote freedom as the key to economic growth. A creative, competitive America is the answer to a changing world, not trade wars that would close doors, create greater barriers, and destroy millions of jobs. We should always remember: Protectionism is destructionism. America's jobs, America's growth, America's future depend on trade--trade that is free, open, and fair.

This year, we have it within our power to take a major step toward a growing global economy and an expanding cycle of prosperity:
the historic free trade agreement negotiated between our country and Canada. And I can also tell you that we're determined to expand this concept, south as well as north. Our goal must be a day when the free flow of trade, from the tip of Tierra del Fuego to the Arctic Circle, unites the people of the Western Hemisphere in a bond of mutually beneficial exchange.

Source: Pres. Reagan's 1988 State of the Union message to Congress, Jan 25, 1988

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=36035



Here are the facts:

1. Reagan first conceived of a North American economic/political bloc when he was a candidate for President in 1979.

2. President Reagan signed the Trade and Tariff Act of 1984 that allowed any President (including himself) to negotiate free-trade agreements and prevent Congress from negotiating over the specifics of a trade agreement

3. President Reagan negotiated the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement and signed it into law. He also continued to push for a North American free-trade agreement (not just the U.S. and Canada)

4. President George H.W. Bush (a Republican) negotiated and signed NAFTA, not President Clinton.

5. President Clinton signed NAFTA into law after Congress---including most Republicans---passed it in his first year as President (1993). He did little more than sign it into law after Congress passed it, and after Reagan and G.W. Bush had done essentially all of the work.


"NAFTA was signed by President George H.W. Bush, Mexican President Salinas, and Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney in 1992. It was ratified by the legislatures of the three countries in 1993. The U.S. House of Representatives approved it by 234 to 200 on November 17, 1993. The U.S. Senate approved it by 60 to 38 on November 20, three days later."


So who supported NAFTA the most? Republicans.

Who opposed it the most? Democrats:



H.R. 3450 (103rd)- North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act -- GovTrack.us.png


https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/103-1993/h575


"The strongest support in the House came from Republicans, who cast 132 votes for the trade plan and 43 against it. Among Democrats, 102 voted for the agreement and 156 opposed it."

http://articles.latimes.com/1993-11-18/news/mn-58150_1_trade-pact


The Senate voted to approve it days later:

"The vote was 61 to 38. As was the case earlier in the House, Republicans supplied the most support, accounting for 34 of the favorable votes to 27 from the Democrats.

http://articles.latimes.com/1993-11-21/news/mn-59485_1_trade-pact


So, as you can see, Republican congressmen (conservatives) are most supportive of free-trade agreements, and Democratic congressmen (liberals) are least the supportive of it.
 
Last edited:
. .
Nothing could be further from the truth. Conservatives are always the ones who are pro-free-trade. They campaign on the issue for goodness sake. Though some liberals do too.

Yes, Reagan increased the number of items that had some restrictions in trade. But, he increased free trade for the most part and reduced regulations, as well as drastically cut taxes on the wealthy. He negotiated the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement and signed it into law. It was Ronald Reagan himself who created the concept the NAFTA as early as 1979 when he spoke of a "North American Accord". He talks about this in his announcement declaring his candidacy for President:


"It is no accident that this unmatched potential for progress and prosperity exists in three countries with such long-standing heritages of free government. A developing closeness among Canada, Mexico and the United States – a North American accord – would permit achievement of that potential in each country beyond that which I believe any of them – strong as they are – could accomplish in the absence of such cooperation."

"By developing methods of working closely together, we will lay the foundations for future cooperation on a broader and more significant scale."

"A developing closeness between the United States, Canada and Mexico would serve notice on friend and foe alike that we were prepared for a long haul, looking outward again and confident our of future; that together we are going to create jobs, to generate new fortunes of wealth for many and provide a legacy for the children of each of our countries.

Now let us work toward the goal of using the assets of this continent, its resources, technology and foodstuffs in the most efficient ways possible for the common good of all its people. It may take the next 100 years but we can dare to dream that at some future date a map of the world might show the North American continent as one in which the peoples and commerce of its three strong countries flow more freely across their present borders than they do toda
y."

https://www.reaganlibrary.archives.gov/archives/reference/11.13.79.html


Reagan negotiated the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement and signed it into law:


"The impetus for NAFTA actually began with President Ronald Reagan, who campaigned on a North American common market.

In 1984, Congress passed the Trade and Tariff Act. That gave the President "fast-track" authority to negotiate free trade agreements more freely. That's because it restricts Congressional input to the ability to approve or disapprove. Congress lost the ability to change negotiating points.

Canadian Prime Minister Mulroney agreed with Reagan to begin negotiations for the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. It was signed in 1988, went into effect in 1989."



And he sure enough, he continued to support the idea of North American agreement as well. From his State of the Union speech in 1988:


"One of the greatest contributions the US can make to the world is to promote freedom as the key to economic growth. A creative, competitive America is the answer to a changing world, not trade wars that would close doors, create greater barriers, and destroy millions of jobs. We should always remember: Protectionism is destructionism. America's jobs, America's growth, America's future depend on trade--trade that is free, open, and fair.

This year, we have it within our power to take a major step toward a growing global economy and an expanding cycle of prosperity:
the historic free trade agreement negotiated between our country and Canada. And I can also tell you that we're determined to expand this concept, south as well as north. Our goal must be a day when the free flow of trade, from the tip of Tierra del Fuego to the Arctic Circle, unites the people of the Western Hemisphere in a bond of mutually beneficial exchange.

Source: Pres. Reagan's 1988 State of the Union message to Congress, Jan 25, 1988

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=36035



Here are the facts:

1. Reagan first conceived of a North American economic/political bloc when he was a candidate for President in 1979.

2. President Reagan signed the Trade and Tariff Act of 1984 that allowed any President (including himself) to negotiate free-trade agreements and prevent Congress from negotiating over the specifics of a trade agreement

3. President Reagan negotiated the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement and signed it into law. He also continued to push for a North American free-trade agreement (not just the U.S. and Canada)

4. President George H.W. Bush (a Republican) negotiated and signed NAFTA, not President Clinton.

5. President Clinton signed NAFTA into law after Congress---including almost most Republicans---passed it in his first year as President (1993). He did little more than sign it into law after Congress passed it, and after Reagan and G.W. Bush had done essentially all of the work.


"NAFTA was signed by President George H.W. Bush, Mexican President Salinas, and Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney in 1992. It was ratified by the legislatures of the three countries in 1993. The U.S. House of Representatives approved it by 234 to 200 on November 17, 1993. The U.S. Senate approved it by 60 to 38 on November 20, three days later."


So who supported NAFTA the most? Republicans.

Who opposed it the most? Democrats:



View attachment 351594

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/103-1993/h575


"The strongest support in the House came from Republicans, who cast 132 votes for the trade plan and 43 against it. Among Democrats, 102 voted for the agreement and 156 opposed it."

http://articles.latimes.com/1993-11-18/news/mn-58150_1_trade-pact


The Senate voted to pass it days later:

"The vote was 61 to 38. As was the case earlier in the House, Republicans supplied the most support, accounting for 34 of the favorable votes to 27 from the Democrats.

http://articles.latimes.com/1993-11-21/news/mn-59485_1_trade-pact


So, as you can see, Republican congressmen (conservatives) are most supportive of free-trade agreements, and Democratic congressmen (liberals) are least the supportive of it.
Reagan was much more anti free trade than Clinton
Nothing could be further from the truth. Conservatives are always the ones who are pro-free-trade. They campaign on the issue for goodness sake. Though some liberals do too.

Yes, Reagan increased the number of items that had some restrictions in trade. But, he increased free trade for the most part and reduced regulations, as well as drastically cut taxes on the wealthy. He negotiated the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement and signed it into law. It was Ronald Reagan himself who created the concept the NAFTA as early as 1979 when he spoke of a "North American Accord". He talks about this in his announcement declaring his candidacy for President:


"It is no accident that this unmatched potential for progress and prosperity exists in three countries with such long-standing heritages of free government. A developing closeness among Canada, Mexico and the United States – a North American accord – would permit achievement of that potential in each country beyond that which I believe any of them – strong as they are – could accomplish in the absence of such cooperation."

"By developing methods of working closely together, we will lay the foundations for future cooperation on a broader and more significant scale."

"A developing closeness between the United States, Canada and Mexico would serve notice on friend and foe alike that we were prepared for a long haul, looking outward again and confident our of future; that together we are going to create jobs, to generate new fortunes of wealth for many and provide a legacy for the children of each of our countries.

Now let us work toward the goal of using the assets of this continent, its resources, technology and foodstuffs in the most efficient ways possible for the common good of all its people. It may take the next 100 years but we can dare to dream that at some future date a map of the world might show the North American continent as one in which the peoples and commerce of its three strong countries flow more freely across their present borders than they do toda
y."

https://www.reaganlibrary.archives.gov/archives/reference/11.13.79.html


Reagan negotiated the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement and signed it into law:


"The impetus for NAFTA actually began with President Ronald Reagan, who campaigned on a North American common market.

In 1984, Congress passed the Trade and Tariff Act. That gave the President "fast-track" authority to negotiate free trade agreements more freely. That's because it restricts Congressional input to the ability to approve or disapprove. Congress lost the ability to change negotiating points.

Canadian Prime Minister Mulroney agreed with Reagan to begin negotiations for the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. It was signed in 1988, went into effect in 1989."



And he sure enough, he continued to support the idea of North American agreement as well. From his State of the Union speech in 1988:


"One of the greatest contributions the US can make to the world is to promote freedom as the key to economic growth. A creative, competitive America is the answer to a changing world, not trade wars that would close doors, create greater barriers, and destroy millions of jobs. We should always remember: Protectionism is destructionism. America's jobs, America's growth, America's future depend on trade--trade that is free, open, and fair.

This year, we have it within our power to take a major step toward a growing global economy and an expanding cycle of prosperity:
the historic free trade agreement negotiated between our country and Canada. And I can also tell you that we're determined to expand this concept, south as well as north. Our goal must be a day when the free flow of trade, from the tip of Tierra del Fuego to the Arctic Circle, unites the people of the Western Hemisphere in a bond of mutually beneficial exchange.

Source: Pres. Reagan's 1988 State of the Union message to Congress, Jan 25, 1988

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=36035



Here are the facts:

1. Reagan first conceived of a North American economic/political bloc when he was a candidate for President in 1979.

2. President Reagan signed the Trade and Tariff Act of 1984 that allowed any President (including himself) to negotiate free-trade agreements and prevent Congress from negotiating over the specifics of a trade agreement

3. President Reagan negotiated the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement and signed it into law. He also continued to push for a North American free-trade agreement (not just the U.S. and Canada)

4. President George H.W. Bush (a Republican) negotiated and signed NAFTA, not President Clinton.

5. President Clinton signed NAFTA into law after Congress---including almost most Republicans---passed it in his first year as President (1993). He did little more than sign it into law after Congress passed it, and after Reagan and G.W. Bush had done essentially all of the work.


"NAFTA was signed by President George H.W. Bush, Mexican President Salinas, and Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney in 1992. It was ratified by the legislatures of the three countries in 1993. The U.S. House of Representatives approved it by 234 to 200 on November 17, 1993. The U.S. Senate approved it by 60 to 38 on November 20, three days later."


So who supported NAFTA the most? Republicans.

Who opposed it the most? Democrats:



View attachment 351594

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/103-1993/h575


"The strongest support in the House came from Republicans, who cast 132 votes for the trade plan and 43 against it. Among Democrats, 102 voted for the agreement and 156 opposed it."

http://articles.latimes.com/1993-11-18/news/mn-58150_1_trade-pact


The Senate voted to pass it days later:

"The vote was 61 to 38. As was the case earlier in the House, Republicans supplied the most support, accounting for 34 of the favorable votes to 27 from the Democrats.

http://articles.latimes.com/1993-11-21/news/mn-59485_1_trade-pact


So, as you can see, Republican congressmen (conservatives) are most supportive of free-trade agreements, and Democratic congressmen (liberals) are least the supportive of it.

Read this wikipedia article on the history of free trade.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_trade
Free trade has always been championed by liberals.

The 1st U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, advocated tariffs to help protect infant industries in his "Report on Manufactures." For the most part, the "Jeffersonians" strongly opposed it. In the 19th century, statesmen such as Senator Henry Clay continued Hamilton's themes within the Whig Party under the name "American System." The opposition Democratic Party contested several elections throughout the 1830s, 1840s, and 1850s in part over the issue of the tariff and protection of industry.[17]



Britain waged two Opium Wars to force China to legalize the opium trade and to open all of China to British merchants.
In Britain, free trade became a central principle practiced by the 1840s. Under the Treaty of Nanking, China opened five treaty ports to world trade in 1843. The first free trade agreement, the Cobden-Chevalier Treaty, was put in place in 1860 between the United Kingdom and France, which led to successive agreements between other countries in Europe.[18]

In the U.S., the Democratic Party favored moderate tariffs used for government revenue only, while the Whigs favored higher protective tariffs to protect favored industries. The economist Henry Charles Carey became a leading proponent of the "American System" of economics. This mercantilist "American System" was opposed by the Democratic Party of Andrew Jackson, Martin Van Buren, James K. Polk, Franklin Pierce, and James Buchanan.

The fledgling Republican Party led by Abraham Lincoln, who called himself a "Henry Clay tariff Whig", strongly opposed free trade and implemented a 44-percent tariff during the Civil War—in part to pay for railroad subsidies and for the war effort, and to protect favored industries.[19] William McKinley (later to become President of the United States) stated the stance of the Republican Party (which won every election for President from 1868 until 1912, except the two non-consecutive terms of Grover Cleveland) as thus:

Under free trade the trader is the master and the producer the slave. Protection is but the law of nature, the law of self-preservation, of self-development, of securing the highest and best destiny of the race of man. [It is said] that protection is immoral…. Why, if protection builds up and elevates 63,000,000 [the U.S. population] of people, the influence of those 63,000,000 of people elevates the rest of the world. We cannot take a step in the pathway of progress without benefitting mankind everywhere. Well, they say, 'Buy where you can buy the cheapest'…. Of course, that applies to labor as to everything else. Let me give you a maxim that is a thousand times better than that, and it is the protection maxim: 'Buy where you can pay the easiest.' And that spot of earth is where labor wins its highest rewards.[20]

Many classical liberals, especially in 19th and early 20th century Britain (e.g., [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Stuart_Mill']John Stuart Mill
) and in the United States for much of the 20th century (e.g., Cordell Hull), believed that free trade promoted peace.[citation needed] Woodrow Wilson included free-trade rhetoric in his "Fourteen Points" speech of 1918:

The program of the world's peace, therefore, is our program; and that program, the only possible program, all we see it, is this: [...]

3. The removal, so far as possible, of all economic barriers and the establishment of equality of trade conditions among all the nations consenting to the peace and associating themselves for its maintenance.[21]
[/URL]


Liberal "free trade" "conservatives" post ww2 took control of Republican party. Nixon was highly liberal, and lowered tariffs and created the petro dollar. http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Richard_Nixon_Free_Trade.htm

On Nafta:
Carter, Bush, and Ford also all supported Nafta, they were highly influenced by liberals.
Reagan was only republican to campaign most on protectionism of any president except trump in past 30 years.

https://mises.org/library/ronald-reagan-protectionist

Mark Shields, a columnist for the Washington Post, recently wrote of President Reagan's "blind devotion to the doctrine of free trade." If President Reagan has a devotion to free trade, it must be blind because he has been way off the mark. In fact, he has been the most protectionist president since Herbert Hoover.

Admittedly, his rhetoric has been confusing. In 1986 Reagan said, "Our trade policy rests firmly on the foundation of free and open markets. I recognize. . . the inescapable conclusion that all of history has taught: the freer the flow of world trade, the stronger the tides of human progress and peace among nations."

But he advocated protectionism early in his 1980 campaign, saying to the U.S. auto industry: "Japan is part of the problem. This is where government can be legitimately involved. That is, to convince the Japanese in one way or another that, in their own interests, that deluge of cars must be slowed while our industry gets back on its feet..."

Reagan did help create nafta, but was highly influenced by the liberals, especially rockefellers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockefeller_Republican
Rockefellers were liberals disguised as conservatives, see modern Day Republicans in Name Only like John Mccain and Paul Ryan, Bush, people who support Obama, vote clinton , and hate trump
 
.
Reagan was much more anti free trade than Clinton


He was very pro-free-trade, however you look at it. He campaigned on and initiated the process for NAFTA. He himself negotiated and signed the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, and then continued to push for a North American free-trade agreement. He was the President who really started all of this. And of course, he drastically cut taxes on the wealthy, reduced financial regulations, and fought the unions.

Reagan did help create nafta, but was highly influenced by the liberals, especially rockefellers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockefeller_Republican
Rockefellers were liberals disguised as conservatives, see modern Day Republicans in Name Only like John Mccain and Paul Ryan, Bush, people who support Obama, vote clinton , and hate trump


Well, let's put it this way: modern-day Republicans mostly support free-trade agreements, and Democrats mostly oppose it. You can see this in the break down in the vote for NAFTA:

H.R. 3450 (103rd)- North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act -- GovTrack.us.png

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/103-1993/h575
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/103-1993/h575


"The strongest support in the House came from Republicans, who cast 132 votes for the trade plan and 43 against it. Among Democrats, 102 voted for the agreement and 156 opposed it."
 
.
On the first day he's going to blab about all the little gray Aliens we have in Area 51 as our Minions. That secret is as good as &$@# over.
 
.
Their country, their rules.

This new America was created by their own choice.

If people don't like it, then don't go there. If they are American citizens, then next time don't vote for an Independent candidate as a form of protest, it doesn't work.

but UN should abuse US for abusing human rights and cheating in election .... how many times USA used this card against other countries after their election !?
 
.
He was very pro-free-trade, however you look at it. He campaigned on and initiated the process for NAFTA. He himself negotiated and signed the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, and then continued to push for a North American free-trade agreement. He was the President who really started all of this. And of course, he drastically cut taxes on the wealthy, reduced financial regulations, and fought the unions.




Well, let's put it this way: modern-day Republicans mostly support free-trade agreements, and Democrats mostly oppose it. You can see this in the break down in the vote for NAFTA:

View attachment 351757
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/103-1993/h575


"The strongest support in the House came from Republicans, who cast 132 votes for the trade plan and 43 against it. Among Democrats, 102 voted for the agreement and 156 opposed it."
No, Reagan did not start all of this, he was the first to backlash against the liberals who have taken over the GOP. See Rockefeller Republicans. Modern day republicans are very liberal, neocons, and RINOs. Look at how Bush family, a rockefeller republican liberal would not support trump.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics...s-stand-on-donald-trump-a-cheat-sheet/481449/

Only old guard republicans pre 1950s, like Bob dole support Trump.

There was a massive invasion of GOP by liberals under Rockefeller Republicans.
Democrats are Liberal Republicans
http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2012/12/21/How-Democrats-Became-Liberal-Republicans#page1

https://newrepublic.com/article/98542/rockys-ghost

Rockefellers spearheaded Nafta even before Ronald Reagan. Their ally in Nixon administration was Kissinger. Nelson Rockefeller was vice president during Ford administration. Rockefellers kicked Nixon out of the White house with made up watergate scandal.

https://books.google.com/books?id=2...#v=onepage&q=nelson rockefeller nafta&f=false
 
.
No, Reagan did not start all of this


Well, whether he started it or not, he was very supportive of free-trade and furthered it as President. That much is clear. That was my main point.

Only old guard republicans pre 1950s, like Bob dole support Trump.

There was a massive invasion of GOP by liberals under Rockefeller Republicans.
Democrats are Liberal Republicans
http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2012/12/21/How-Democrats-Became-Liberal-Republicans#page1

https://newrepublic.com/article/98542/rockys-ghost

Rockefellers spearheaded Nafta even before Ronald Reagan. Their ally in Nixon administration was Kissinger. Nelson Rockefeller was vice president during Ford administration. Rockefellers kicked Nixon out of the White house with made up watergate scandal.

https://books.google.com/books?id=2...#v=onepage&q=nelson rockefeller nafta&f=false


Well, let's just agree on this:

Modern-day Republicans mostly support free-trade agreements, and Democrats mostly oppose it. That was my only point.
 
.
Well, whether he started it or not, he was very supportive of free-trade and furthered it as President. That much is clear. That was my main point.




Well, let's just agree on this:

Modern-day Republicans mostly support free-trade agreements, and Democrats mostly oppose it. That was my only point.

No, conservatives do that. They support low taxes for the wealthy, a lower minimum wage, less regulation in financial markets, and trade deals that hurt American workers. They're quite open about it. This has led to wages stagnating and to a decline in the middle class, all while income for the wealthiest Americans (top 1-10%) has soared over the past 35 years.

I didn't say the Clintons were the champions of the working class either.

But my point was about conservatives:

"They support low taxes for the wealthy, a lower minimum wage, less regulation in financial markets, and trade deals that hurt American workers. They're quite open about it. This has led to wages stagnating and to a decline in the middle class, all while income for the wealthiest Americans (top 1-10%) has soared over the past 35 years."

Ronald Reagan was fighting against a party taken over by Liberal Rockefellers, one of the most powerful families and traditionally Democrat. But then infiltrated the Republicans under Nelson Rockefellers. These people are NOT conservative. Even democrats are now liberal republicans controlled by Rockefellers
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom