Dawood Ibrahim in London: Wanted to return but rejected by Indian Govt.

[Areesh]

Well for Pakistanis never any proof..there was no proof that OBL was residing in

Pakistan..despite rest of the world telling her so.
Even when he was found in Pakistan..then also there wasn't enough proof for some Pakistanis.

He is a terrorist ..responsible for murder of 300 people..he wanted to make deal wanted to be treated as a VIP.

He wanted live in his house and not a jail cell and fight case from there.(just like Musharraf is doing).

Hiding behind OBL won't work. Separate case. Separate proofs.

So again.

1 No proof he is in Pakistan
2 Why you rejected him coming back to India.

And we do not make deals with terrorists.

Yeah you only give money to them. No dealing.

 

[Mukunda Murthi Rao]

1 No proof he is in Pakistan

Dawood's daughter got married to javed miandad's son in karachi.
Can you join the dots from here on?

 

[Areesh]

Dawood's daughter got married to javed miandad's son in karachi.
Can you join the dots from here on?

No dots connect. A marriage doesn't prove that he lives in Pakistan today.

 

[HariPrasad]

So he is in London. And not in Clifton Karachi Pakistan.

This is a story of long ago.

 

[Sage]

Dawood Ibrahim is welcome to live in Pakistan ....If Altaf Hussein can live in London, Hirbyar Marri in Switzerland and Brahamdog in New Delhi ...why should we have problem with D if he we would want to live in Pakistan !

 

[Sunan]

India never wanted dawood Ibrahim to come back.if he comes back how Raw and indian govt gonna fool the people of India that he is in Pakistan.Old dirty game by Raw to assert its relevance.

 

[Sheikh Rauf]

Pakistan said osama was not in pakistan as well. Wonder how he was found in the middle of pakistan.

Also if dawood was not in pakistan, how come his daughter got married to javed miandad's son in karachi?

Do you have any prove.. why dont you suggest this to your buddy United State to bring us in court of justice..
either india or indian are too stupid to understand worlds politics or just trying to taunt like dehati aurat..
and Mr. Dawood was in contact with indian authorities.. wow
i never believed what indian said ever specially their big mouth media.

 

[Musafir117]

The senior Supreme Court lawyer maintained that Dawood had offered to surrender to Indian authorities, but the then Maharashtra chief minister Sharad Pawar had rejected the offer.
...........
Zee news waited for 20 years to publish this news:omghaha July 24 2015 the news of date in which he claiming he once ready for surrender BUT THE THEN Maharashtra CM Parshd reject the offer.
Another lie of indian establishment exposed as another indian said he met him in London, and was recently.

 

[Spring Onion]

He was in London in 1994(after 1993 bombings and Sharad Pawar was in chief minister of Maharashtra 1993-95)..that is when this incident happened.

After that he moved to UAE and then Pakistan..which is where he currently resides

he met an Indian lawyer/politician in london when UPA govt was in power.. does not mean he lives in london.

Yeh soon after the bombing the question is whether Indian Government ever asked London why it has sheltered a "Terrorist" ?????????????????????

Can you Indians reply ?

 

[coffee_cup]

It would have been freaking funny if it were not that tragic.

British are the real culprits and a nation, which is hosting terrorists from all around the world. Just look at the people, whom they have given asylum.

Every thief or terrorist wanted somewhere in the world for the heinous crimes he/she has committed back home finds a safe haven in the UK.

I think both Pakistan and India should wake up, stop hating each other and realize who the real enemy is ....

 

[livingdead]

Yeh soon after the bombing the question is whether Indian Government ever asked London why it has sheltered a "Terrorist" ?????????????????????

Can you Indians reply ?

uk used to host anybody who does not caused problem for them... only 9/11 changed everything... they had LTTE center here, overground running.

 

[Areesh]

This is a story of long ago.

Yup just after the bombing. Why didn't your govt ask British govt that why it is sheltering a terrorist?

 

[Spring Onion]

uk used to host anybody who does not caused problem for them... only 9/11 changed everything... they had LTTE center here, overground running.

So it is perfectly legal and OK at international level to host Dawood. please consider the same right in our case.

India has no moral right to protest

 

[livingdead]

So it is perfectly legal and OK at international level to host Dawood. please consider the same right in our case.

India has no moral right to protest

you have right to host anybody you want... and we have right to protest..

 

[HariPrasad]

Yup just after the bombing. Why didn't your govt ask British govt that why it is sheltering a terrorist?

oK THAN IT GIVES YOU RIGHT to shelter him. Happy now?