Damage assessment of strikes in Syria by NATO; what was struck?

[Muhammed45]

76 missile fired to hit this target:

View attachment 466712
View attachment 466713
And still:
View attachment 466714

 

[truthseeker2010]

Shah se agay shah ka chamcha

yeh shah ka t.... hai

 

[war&peace]

yeh shah ka t.... hai

Yaar ha apna hi bhai...bas dukh hota ha...I wish no harm to him but just feel sad.

 

[truthseeker2010]

76 missile fired to hit this target:

View attachment 466712
View attachment 466713
And still:
View attachment 466714

$76 Million worth of weapons cannot flat an acre...... how poor is that!

 

[zzzz]

So French strike is as laughable as that famous "76 missiles" one

Direct hit into sand with "7 Scalp missiles"

 

[LeGenD]

Depends upon the type of warheads in use.

US officials have repeatedly asserted that these strikes were carried out with utmost precision (and caution) in order to avoid collateral damage and minimize casualties. Not a single civilian died in these strikes which is an achievement in itself.

As for that research facility, it was huge.

---

Bear in mind that a Tomahawk cruise missile can be equipped with a nuclear warhead to maximize destruction.

US can erase entire Syria from existence in a span of few minutes, if it wants to.

This is not a laughing matter.

 

[Muhammed45]

Depends upon the type of warheads in use.

US officials have repeatedly asserted that these strikes were carried out with utmost precision (and caution) in order to avoid collateral damage and minimize casualties. Not a single person died in these strikes which is an achievement in itself.

As for that research facility, it was huge.

---

Bear in mind that a Tomahawk cruise missile can be equipped with a nuclear warhead to maximize destruction.

US can erase entire Syria from existence in a span of few minutes, if it wants to.

This is not a laughing matter.

Americans are a total joke, that's what makes me laugh.

If they could do, they would simply do it. Don't take their crappy claims so seriously bud, they failed in Syria, hence blind attacks hence shouting out of desperation hence Trumps Tiwts hence.....

So French strike is as laughable as that famous "76 missiles" one

Direct hit into sand with "7 Scalp missiles"

Lol

 

[Gomig-21]

There's definitely a problem with that many missiles hitting three separate buildings and although what's left is pretty useless and they were pretty large buildings, it's still a relatively decent amount of structure still standing.

The only explanation I can think of is that they wanted to reduce collateral damage and had low impact warheads in the tomahawks in case the missiles either struck the wrong targets or were worried that large storage of chemicals or weapons would be in those building and the result would be huge explosions and much more spread out damage and deaths. That might also explain how some of the very hard and solid, still-standing reinforced concrete that these buildings were made out of was still standing.

The other thing is that they can probably only pinpoint certain coordinates for so many missiles that there's bound to be several of the whole bunch repeatedly hitting the same spot, hence the damage is not complete as we would think it should be. 20 or 30 could hit the same exact spot and after 2 or 3, the rest aren't doing much more damage.

 

[monitor]

Attack carried out after declaring where they are going to attack gave 1 week time to move all weapons and hardware . So basically what they destroyed is empty building.

 

[Yaseen1]

Depends upon the type of warheads in use.

US officials have repeatedly asserted that these strikes were carried out with utmost precision (and caution) in order to avoid collateral damage and minimize casualties. Not a single civilian died in these strikes which is an achievement in itself.

As for that research facility, it was huge.

---

Bear in mind that a Tomahawk cruise missile can be equipped with a nuclear warhead to maximize destruction.

US can erase entire Syria from existence in a span of few minutes, if it wants to.

This is not a laughing matter.

if u.s nuke Syria radiation will also badly affect israel as it has less strategic depth and is close to syria .u.s will never do this as their whole nukes are under jewish control

 

[raptor22]

There's definitely a problem with that many missiles hitting three separate buildings and although what's left is pretty useless and they were pretty large buildings, it's still a relatively decent amount of structure still standing.

The only explanation I can think of is that they wanted to reduce collateral damage and had low impact warheads in the tomahawks in case the missiles either struck the wrong targets or were worried that large storage of chemicals or weapons would be in those building and the result would be huge explosions and much more spread out damage and deaths. That might also explain how some of the very hard and solid, still-standing reinforced concrete that these buildings were made out of was still standing.

The other thing is that they can probably only pinpoint certain coordinates for so many missiles that there's bound to be several of the whole bunch repeatedly hitting the same spot, hence the damage is not complete as we would think it should be. 20 or 30 could hit the same exact spot and after 2 or 3, the rest aren't doing much more damage.

They shouldn't have targeted alleged chemical storage facility if they were worried about "that large storage of chemicals or weapons would be in those building and the result would be huge explosions and much more spread out damage and deaths." they targeted it 'cause they knew nothing were there .. how a responsible entity could target a building while it's well aware that its a chemical storage facility? if they knew why they didn't provide info for OPCW to inspect it?it would've had more propaganda value ...

Moreover last year they used only 59 missiles to target Shayrat AB with its bunkers and shelters now they targeted 3 buildings with 79 missiles and still have not leveled?

 

[LeGenD]

if u.s nuke Syria radiation will also badly affect israel as it has less strategic depth and is close to syria .u.s will never do this as their whole nukes are under jewish control

Hmm.

Good observation, bro.

 

[Vergennes]

So French strike is as laughable as that famous "76 missiles" one

Direct hit into sand with "7 Scalp missiles"

The Russians first claim they didn't witness any French participation,now claim French missiles hit nothing ? What a bunch of face saving liars,seriously.

 

[LeGenD]

They shouldn't have targeted alleged chemical storage facility if they were worried about "that large storage of chemicals or weapons would be in those building and the result would be huge explosions and much more spread out damage and deaths." they targeted it 'cause they knew nothing were there .. how a responsible entity could target a building while it's well aware that its a chemical storage facility? if they knew why they didn't provide info for OPCW to inspect it?it would've had more propaganda value ...

They didn't claim that 'chemical weapons' were actually stored in the Barzah scientific research centre. However, they suspected that research carried out in this facility is crucial to chemical weapons program of the regime so it should be taken out.

Moreover last year they used only 59 missiles to target Shayrat AB with its bunkers and shelters now they targeted 3 buildings with 79 missiles and still have not leveled?

Damage is substantial when you look at it in this way:

One can also notice that this structure is/was huge.

I suspect that they did not use high-explosive warheads in this case; they didn't wanted to set the entire neighborhood on fire.

@Gomig-21

So French strike is as laughable as that famous "76 missiles" one

Direct hit into sand with "7 Scalp missiles"

You guys are simply trolling at this stage.

We are talking about precision strikes here, not carpet bombing initiatives to level entire neighbourhoods.

---

The French struck a camouflaged CW bunker, Russian Einstein.

Before:

After:

We can clearly see the target being flattened/decimated.

I suppose that the Russian and Iranian criteria of success/damage is to set entire neighborhood on fire since both have shortage of precision strike weapons.

 

[ptldM3]

New images:-

Clearly many missed

76 missile fired to hit this target:

View attachment 466712
View attachment 466713
And still:
View attachment 466714

They knew many missiles would not hit the target or get intercepted. You don’t need that many missiles to hit so few targets.

The Russians first claim they didn't witness any French participation,now claim French missiles hit nothing ? What a bunch of face saving liars,seriously.

No the French got there missiles intercepted as per photos of wreckage from French missiles, many other missiles just hit empty fields. Technically the French didn’t participate when nothing they lauched actually managed to hit a damn thing.

PS why is everyone avoiding this question, why are there no civilian casualties if many of these biological and chemical factories got hit in populated areas. Does the coalition use magic missiles that turn toxic chemical clouds into rainbows? Everyone knows who the real lyers are