What's new

Dalai Lama to retire from political life

(Reuters) - The Dalai Lama said on Thursday he would step down as Tibet's political leader, a move seen as transforming the government-in-exile into a more assertive and democratic body in the face of Chinese pressure.

By devolving his powers, the Dalai Lama would give the prime minister greater clout as the region seeks autonomy from China. Tibetans will vote for a new prime minister this month, with the elections seen as ushering in a generation of younger, secular leaders and strengthening the movement's global standing.

"As early as the 1960s, I have repeatedly stressed that Tibetans need a leader, elected freely by the Tibetan people, to whom I can devolve power," the Dalai Lama said in his annual speech marking 52 years since he fled Tibet after a failed uprising against the Chinese.

"Now, we have clearly reached the time to put this into effect," he told a subdued crowd of 2,000 monks and Tibetans.

The Dalai Lama, whose announcement was widely expected, will remain Tibet's spiritual leader and continue to advocate "meaningful autonomy" for Tibet from Dharamsala, where he has lived in exile since 1959.

The prime minister of the Tibetan government-in-exile, Samdhong Rinpoche, told reporters on Thursday it was not clear if the parliament would accept the Dalai Lama's resignation and warned of a constitutional deadlock.

China, which regards the Dalai Lama as a dangerous separatist responsible for stirring unrest in Tibet, denounced his resignation as a "trick".

"The Dalai Lama uses religion as a disguise and he is a political exile who has been carrying out separatist activities for a long time," said Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu.

"For years he has been expressing his intention to retire. We think these are tricks to deceive the international community."


UNREST IN TIBET

By divesting his political powers, Dalai, 75, Lama has made it more difficult for China to influence the course of the independence movement after his death, analysts say.

The Chinese government says it has to approve all reincarnations of living Buddhas, or senior religious figures in Tibetan Buddhism. It also says China has to sign off on the choosing of the next Dalai Lama.

Tibetans fear that China will use the thorny issue of the Dalai Lama's succession to split the movement, with one new Lama named by the exiles and one by China after his death. A new Dalai Lama would need decades before they could lead the movement.

On Monday, China insisted the Dalai Lama had no right to choose his successor, but must follow the historical and religious tradition of reincarnation.

"There is a lot of talk that the Chinese are waiting for the Dalai Lama to die, thinking that without him the movement will stall," said Kanwal Sibal, former Indian foreign secretary.

"By democratising the movement, he is trying to steer Tibet's leadership in a direction that will make it difficult for the Chinese to dictate the dialogue."

Some Tibetans fear that a reduced role for the Dalai Lama, who won the Noel Peace prize in 1989, could diminish the larger independence movement. The charismatic and media-savvy leader balances his spiritual duties with courting high-profile support from Hollywood superstars.

But analysts say he is still likely to wield a large amount of power over the parliament-in-exile due to his global renown and the devotion of ordinary Tibetans.

The three main contenders for the prime minister's post, to be contested later in March, are all secular, not monks like the incumbent, adding to a sense of modernisation of the exiled movement.

The favourite is Lobsang Sangay, a Fulbright scholar with a doctorate in law from the Harvard. In 2007, he was selected as one of the twenty-four Young Leaders of Asia by the Asia Society.

China has ruled Tibet with an iron fist since Communist troops marched in 1950. It says its rule has bought much needed development to a poor and backward region.

Rights groups accuse China of failing to respect Tibet's unique religion and culture and of suppressing its people.

By devolving his political leadership, it could also make it easier for the Dalai Lama to travel and be hosted by leaders in Western capitals, where often there is reluctance to meet amid worries it could upset diplomatic and trade ties with Beijing.

Tibetan protests led by Buddhist monks against Chinese rule in March 2008 gave way to torrid violence, with rioters torching shops and turning on residents, especially Han Chinese, who many Tibetans see as intruders threatening their culture.

At least 19 people died in the unrest, which sparked waves of protests across Tibetan areas. Pro-Tibet groups overseas say more than 200 people were killed in a subsequent crackdown.

(Additional reporting by Henry Foy in New Delhi and Michael Martina in Beijing)

(Writing by Alistair Scrutton, Editing by Miral Fahmy)

Dalai Lama plans to quit as Tibet political leader | Reuters
 
. .
The end of a "political chip". :P

Maybe India will go for another one of our separatist groups instead.

But there are no violent uprisings this time, like there were in 1959, for them to capitalize on.
 
.
The end of a "political chip". :P

Maybe India will go for another one of our separatist groups instead.

But there are no violent uprisings this time, like there were in 1959, for them to capitalize on.

Something tells me the replacement is not going to come from religious circles. They might prop up a passionate political activist. This could fuel the worldwide motion for "free tibet". Yes, i think a rally point would take this to greater heights. China must be cautious now more than ever since the pacifist is bidding adieu.
 
.
China must be cautious now more than ever since the pacifist is bidding adieu.

So they are going to prop up someone violent instead? :lol:

And being cautious is always a good thing.

Note that China has NO active armed insurgencies, even despite foreign nations trying to meddle. The unrest never transforms into insurgency.

Nor have any countries in the world recognized an independent Tibet.

I think India played this political chip poorly. And it will soon be too late.
 
.
Something tells me the replacement is not going to come from religious circles. They might prop up a passionate political activist. This could fuel the worldwide motion for "free tibet". Yes, i think a rally point would take this to greater heights. China must be cautious now more than ever since the pacifist is bidding adieu.

How was he possibly a pacifist?? He was backed by the CIA and Tibetan rebels trained in Colorado. Armed Tibetan rebels were dropped back into Tibet and commanded by his brother.
 
.
So they are going to prop up someone violent instead? :lol:

And being cautious is always a good thing.

Note that China has NO active armed insurgencies, even despite foreign nations trying to meddle. The unrest never transforms into insurgency.

Nor have any countries in the world recognized an independent Tibet.

I think India played this political chip poorly. And it will soon be too late.

you are using this line from last 2 days regularly but u dont know an iota abt this:D
lama was not an indian chip,it was always used by west against china. Inspite of his living in india,west have been remained in his contact(nobel price was not given by india).
Think urself ,his absence will create any affect on the minds of tibetan living in india or all over world or on the west????NOOOO
so it all depends on west,when to raise this issue as chip:D,not india
 
.
How was he possibly a pacifist?? He was backed by the CIA and Tibetan rebels trained in Colorado. Armed Tibetan rebels were dropped back into Tibet and commanded by his brother.

conspiracy-theory.jpg
 
.
you are using this line from last 2 days regularly but u dont know an iota abt this:D
lama was not an indian chip,it was always used by west against china. Inspite of his living in india,west have been remained in his contact(nobel price was not given by india).
Think urself ,his absence will create any affect on the minds of tibetan living in india or all over world or on the west????NOOOO
so it all depends on west,when to raise this issue as chip:D,not india

It is not the West that borders Tibet, it is India.

It is not the West that has a border dispute with us (involving Tibet), it is India.

If you guys were so determined to make us your enemies in 1959 (by hosting a separatist group that had just failed to overthrow the Chinese government)... then you should have got value for money from it.

Luckily for us, it was not very successful. :P Not one single country on Earth, recogizes an independent Tibet. No recognition, no insurgency.
 
.
It is not the West that borders Tibet, it is India.

It is not the West that has a border dispute with us (involving Tibet), it is India.

If you guys were so determined to make us your enemies in 1959 (by hosting a separatist group that had just failed to overthrow the Chinese government)... then you should have got value for money from it.

Luckily for us, it was not very successful. :P Not one single country on Earth, recogizes an independent Tibet. No recognition, no insurgency.

We have no need to convince you . If India wanted the they could have created trouble in Tibet. India chose not to because it was not in India's interest. It is China who acts against India by arming Pak.
 
.
We have no need to convince you . If India wanted the they could have created trouble in Tibet. India chose not to because it was not in India's interest. It is China who acts against India by arming Pak.

Which all happened after 1959. :azn:

India chose this path themselves. There were no problems before that.

And you say India "could" have done something, lol. They have constantly used the Dalai Lama to attack us in the media. Check out his very recent comments on Liu Xiaobo.

It is not our fault if India was not capable of using them to achieve any strategic goals, or for sorting out the border dispute.
 
.
It is not the West that borders Tibet, it is India.
You don't have to border China to see human rights being abused

It is not the West that has a border dispute with us (involving Tibet), it is India.
Yeah right.

If you guys were so determined to make us your enemies in 1959 (by hosting a separatist group that had just failed to overthrow the Chinese government)... then you should have got value for money from it.
It's called humanity. Something your communist government will never see. If you had the decency to not invade and rule a helpless peaceful country, we wouldn't have held their peaceful religious leaders in asylum!

Luckily for us, it was not very successful. :P Not one single country on Earth, recogizes an independent Tibet. No recognition, no insurgency.
That's hardly an achievement of yours. You probably don't see all the anti china sentiments. But that's prolly because your oppressive government censors anything related to tibetan independance.
 
.
It is not the West that borders Tibet, it is India.

It is not the West that has a border dispute with us (involving Tibet), it is India.

If you guys were so determined to make us your enemies in 1959 (by hosting a separatist group that had just failed to overthrow the Chinese government)... then you should have got value for money from it.

Luckily for us, it was not very successful. :P Not one single country on Earth, recogizes an independent Tibet. No recognition, no insurgency.

lolllllllllzzzz

i will again say,chip of tibet depends on west when to use and how to use it...
a lot of examples are here like iran,iraq,afghanistan,libya where every step is completely moderated and controlled by west.
but china is not among these countries and not like them but west is united mostly on very steps on these countries.

and ur point on no country recognizes,how much time is needed to recognize or to not:lol:??
 
. .
and ur point on no country recognizes,how much time is needed to recognize or to not:lol:??

Even your own government doesn't recognize it. :azn:

And the only country in the world, that has a border dispute with China's Tibetan region, is India.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom