She has been known to make obnoxious comments..why our media is giving air time for these nonsense.
the tragedy is that loudmouths like her or straight criminals like pramod muthalik find easy acceptance or tolerance among those who would be expected to act against such reactionaries - the urban indian masses - who sadly live a parasitic frivolous life of college, jobs, weddings, gymming, festivaling, pubbing, shopping etc while all this wrongness go all around them... they are not generally of the protesting and questioning sort, unless something touches them personally.
Although I don't understand why Modi is supposed to comment on her comments? Who is she?
after all, she belongs to the same larger movement as him.
When Akbaruddin Awaisi or Abu Azmi or some Muslim politician from UP or Bihar says something provocative, is Modi supposed to comment on their comments too?
abu azmi said some very wrong statements in the past and he got a proper national reaction for that, but when other muslim politicians make rightful or wrongful provocative comments, legal cases are filed on them quickly enough and sanghi spokespeople are vociferous against them on various tv channels.
In kerala communists killed and hung a dog on the same pillar where an RSS activist died, I didn't see any debate on how Hindus are being killed in Communist Kerala and their death being mocked this way.
when i don't support the deobandis or fsa or isil or taliban or or even the owaisis, i wouldn't expect a hindu to support rss... fair??
secondly, many of the kerala communists you speak of are hindus themselves, but they are those who agitate and work to overthrow the anti-human and reactionary 900 bc practices and ideas of the rss.
i have a feeling i have made this statement before, either to you or to another member.