What's new

Critical thinking 101: challenge your mind

Do you want me to put exercises up for practice?


  • Total voters
    19
I will provide an example on the exercise using a newspaper article as my prop to analyze:

Pakistan told to pay $5.9bn to mining firm in Reko Diq case
Amin Ahmed
Updated July 14, 2019

5d2a9583559fc.jpg

The Reko Diq project site. — Photo courtesy Tethyan Copper Company Pakistan/File

ISLAMABAD: The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), one of the five organisations of the World Bank Group, has announced a huge award of $5.976 billion against Pakistan in the Reko Diq case.

The international tribunal which provides facilities for conciliation and arbitration of international investment disputes, rendered its judgement on Friday — a 700-page ruling against Pakistan in the Reko Diq case.

The ICSID awarded a $4.08bn penalty and $1.87bn in interest. The full details of the case are yet to be released by the tribunal.

Special assistant to the prime minister on information Dr Firdous Ashiq Awan when contacted said the law ministry and the attorney general were looking into the matter in light of international laws. She expressed the hope that the government would come up with a formal reaction on Sunday (today). “This is what I can say right now,” she said.

The management of the Tethyan Copper Company (TCC) had claimed $11.43bn in damages. The company had filed claims for international arbitration before the ICSID in 2012 after the Balochistan government rejected a leasing request from the company.

PM’s aide Firdous says law ministry and attorney general are looking into the matter in the light of international laws

The case between the Pakistani government and the international company continued for at least seven years.

5d2a81c03a076.jpg


The TCC lodged the case against Pakistan on January 12, 2012, and the ICSID constituted the tribunal on July 12, 2012.

Klaus Sachs of Germany headed the tribunal while Stanimir A. Alexandrov of Bulgaria represented the claimants and Leonard Hoffmann of United Kingdom represented Pakistan.

Reko Diq mine is famous because of its vast gold and copper reserves and is believed to have the world’s fifth largest gold deposit. Reko Diq, which means sandy peak in the Balochi language, is a small town in Chagai district in Balochistan. It is located in a desert area, 70km north-west of Naukundi, close to the border with Iran and Afghanistan. The area is located in the Tethyan belt that stretches all the way from Turkey and Iran into Pakistan.

The deposit at Reko Diq is a large low grade copper porphyry, with total mineral resources of 5.9bn tonnes of ore with an average copper grade of 0.41 per cent and gold grade of 0.22 g/tonne. From this, the economically mineable portion of the deposit has been calculated at 2.2bn tonnes, with an average copper grade of 0.53pc and gold grade of 0.30 g/ton, with an annual production estimated at 200,000 tons of copper and 250,000 ounces of gold contained in 600,000 tons of concentrate.

According to the extensive technical and financial studies undertaken to secure optimal ‘economies of scale’ efficiencies, and lower mining and processing costs, a large scale, state-of-the-art mining and processing unit is required at Reko Diq.

The TCC completed an extensive and detailed bankable feasibility study establishing the basis for mine development at Reko Diq during August 2010 and submitted a mining lease application in February 2011, along with an environmental and social impact assessment report. Progress on the project came to a standstill in November 2011, when the government of Balochistan summarily rejected the application by the TCC’s local operating subsidiary for a mining lease in respect of Reko Diq.

The TCC was of the view that under the Chagai Hills Joint Venture Agreement (CHEJWA) between the company and the Balochistan government, as well as under the Balochistan Mineral Rules 2002, the TCC Pakistan was legally entitled to the mining lease subject only to ‘routine’ government requirements.

To protect its legal rights, in November 2011 the TCC commenced international arbitration proceedings at two forums: one against the Pakistan government with the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, asserting breaches of the Bilateral Investment Treaty between Australia (where the TCC is incorporated) and Pakistan, and another against the Balochistan government with the International Chamber of Commerce, asserting breaches of the CHEJVA.

Reuters adds: The TCC said it had invested more than $220 million by the time Pakistan’s government, in 2011, unexpectedly refused to grant them the mining lease needed to keep operating.

The ICSID ruled against Pakistan in 2017, but until now had yet to determine the damages owed to the TCC.

Tethyan board chair William Hayes said in a statement the company was still “willing to strike a deal with Pakistan,” but added that “it would continue protecting its commercial and legal interests until the dispute was over.”

https://www.dawn.com/news/1493967

Same news different sources:
https://dunyanews.tv/en/Pakistan/500274-Pakistan-slapped-with-$5.97-billion-penalty-in-Reko-Diq-case
https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/20...an-pay-5-8-billion-damages-to-tethyan-copper/


To understand this you also need to read the previous article: https://www.dawn.com/news/1321955

Now lets analyze this, shall we?

First step: layout the situation and break it down:
A court trial about a mine.
Pakistan was fined 4+1 billion

Now lets get to the details:

Who?
the Tethyan Copper Company Pty Ltd (TCC), a joint venture between Antofagasta and Canada's Barrick Gold Corporation.

What?
TCC had discovered vast mineral wealth more than a decade ago in Reko Diq at the foot of an extinct volcano near Pakistan’s frontier with Iran and Afghanistan (Where). The deposit was set to rank among the world’s biggest untapped copper and gold mines. Tethyan Copper Company’s (TCC) management had claimed $11.43 billion in damages.

The company said it had invested more than $220 million by the time Pakistan’s government, in 2011 (When), unexpectedly refused to grant them the mining lease needed to keep operating. The government of Balochistan had in 2011 refused to grant a mining licence to TCC for the Reko Diq gold-cum-copper project.

Why?
“The feasibility report was found unsatisfactory by experts,” the then chief secretary of Balochistan, Mir Ahmed Bakhsh Lehri had said.

He alleged that the company had not mentioned anything in its report about the processing of gold and copper, which was the main concern of the Balochistan government.

A local government official, who requested anonymity, said at the time that TCC took 'too long' to complete its feasibility study and that it was "cheating" Balochistan by under-valuing the worth of the copper and gold.

How did it come to this?

The TCC was of the view that under the Chagai Hills Joint Venture Agreement (CHEJWA) between the company and the Balochistan government, as well as under the Balochistan Mineral Rules 2002, the TCC Pakistan was legally entitled to the mining lease subject only to ‘routine’ government requirements.

In its ruling, a three-judge bench of the apex court, headed by then chief justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, had stated that the Chagai Hills Exploration Joint Venture Agreement — signed between the Balochistan government and Australian mining company BHP in 1993 — was in conflict with the laws of the country.

BHP had later sold its stakes to the then unknown TCC, which ran the mine till the case started in 2008.

The bench added that all amendments made to the agreement after its signing were unlawful and in contradiction with the agreement.

It further stated that TCC no longer had any rights in relation to the Reko Diq agreement.

However, the ICSID had initially denied its contention of mine ownership.

Reuters adds: The TCC said it had invested more than $220 million by the time Pakistan’s government, in 2011, unexpectedly refused to grant them the mining lease needed to keep operating.


This isnt the only way to analyze it but 1 of the ways to understand what happened and what is going on!


So sometimes you have to read multiple articles to get the full story. Sometimes previous articles will provide more information to continue the current article. Now instead of a personal experience maybe try it with an article of your choice (try choosing shorter articles)
 
.
Critical Thinking Exercise Types
1. Linking Ideas

EXERCISE – Newspaper link up

Take today’s newspaper. Brush through all articles in each section (news, sports, business etc.). Make a list of the articles as a basic concept.

34.-man-sitting-on-a-chair-and-reading-the-newspaper-by-a-window-compressor.jpg


Now find ways in which each article is linked to each other, in each section of the newspaper. Find the overall theme of each section and if you can, try to link the sections of the newspaper to each other.

Once you have done all of this, try to surmise the agenda or aim of this publication.

2. Structuring Arguments
Before doing this exercise you will have to know what a premise and conclusion of an argument are:

Premise: A previous statement or proposition from which another is inferred or follows as a conclusion. It is the base of an argument, theory, or undertaking.

Conclusion: The end of an argument, theory, or undertaking. A judgment or decision reached by reasoning.

EXERCISE – Recognising the premise and conclusion

Look on YouTube or just on Google for some of the best theories, arguments, or speeches ever given or done. Take the piece that you have chosen and determine what the premise of the topic is, and what the conclusion is. There can be several premises but they have to support the conclusion.

3. Recognizing Incongruences
EXERCISE – Challenging the premise

Take the same information from the Recognising premise and conclusion exercise you have done above, and see if you can figure out if any of the premises do not support or link to the conclusion.

If all premises link with the conclusions, then look into the premises themselves. See if there are any false assumptions (or fallacies) in the premises and research their validity.

Analyze the premises to see that there has not been a statement that is assumed true but is actually false.

Taken from: https://blog.mindvalley.com/critical-thinking-exercises/
 
. .
Does the below paragraph come in this category?

In 1984 anti-Sikh riots, in a single city of Delhi, 3000 were killed. In 2002 Gujarat riots, the whole state was burning yet only 2000 were killed. How come?
 
.
Does the below paragraph come in this category?

In 1984 anti-Sikh riots, in a single city of Delhi, 3000 were killed. In 2002 Gujarat riots, the whole state was burning yet only 2000 were killed. How come?
I think this is more of an exaggeration...which is VERY common in media articles (more than you would imagine)...Watch the video (post 8) if you understand Urdu

We can "quickly" analyze it:

If it is reported 3000 were killed yet only 2000 were killed...the other 1000 might be killed/ died might be merged in from other cases...

When the media is in a rush to do breaking news- all they do is take the number of deaths in the city and place it all under the same catastrophic (in this case riots) without thinking who died from liver failure or heart attack... some are generous enough to count how many ambulance brought in; but then again this could be a woman in delivery - unrelated to the riots ...this is why it is best to read from multiple resources :)
 
.
Basically take whatever you hear and see and break it down into pieces. Then analyze those pieces and using the context you have, get its meaning. There is a thin line between critical thinking and overthinking and that's something you have to decide
 
.
I will try to do the homework as soon as I have time. But my main problem is language limitations, so if you are ready to do same exercise in French it will be lot easier for me :enjoy:.

Delete this message after ready to keep thread clean.
Sorry bro.....I dont know French :ashamed:
Again it is an exercise and doing a mistake will only make you a step towards perfectionism ...
 
.
I think this is more of an exaggeration...which is VERY common in media articles (more than you would imagine)...Watch the video (post 8) if you understand Urdu

We can "quickly" analyze it:

If it is reported 3000 were killed yet only 2000 were killed...the other 1000 might be killed/ died might be merged in from other cases...

When the media is in a rush to do breaking news- all they do is take the number of deaths in the city and place it all under the same catastrophic (in this case riots) without thinking who died from liver failure or heart attack... some are generous enough to count how many ambulance brought in; but then again this could be a woman in delivery - unrelated to the riots ...this is why it is best to read from multiple resources :)
No, it is not about error in estimation. It is probably because the government was honest during the time of 1984 anti-Sikh riots. In 2002, it was hiding the actual death toll. In India, the media is controlled by politicians.
 
.
Basically take whatever you hear and see and break it down into pieces. Then analyze those pieces and using the context you have, get its meaning. There is a thin line between critical thinking and overthinking and that's something you have to decide
Yes that is basically the theory...but not everyone knows how to go about with the steps...or even goes down that road :)

No, it is not about error in estimation. It is probably because the government was honest during the time of 1984 anti-Sikh riots. In 2002, it was hiding the actual death toll. In India, the media is controlled by politicians.
THAT can be a possibility...Now in order to find out which is right..You might need to do some research as to who/ which agencies reported and what their count was!
 
.
Yes that is basically the theory...but not everyone knows how to go about with the steps...or even goes down that road :)
Honestly I only use it when it's something important or I hate the person, who said it. Then want to smack every one of his words, across his face. Otherwise it uses to much energy
 
.
In 1984 anti-Sikh riots, in a single city of Delhi, 3000 were killed. In 2002 Gujarat riots, the whole state was burning yet only 2000 were killed. How come?
Is this by any chance 2 separate statements from 2 separate articles?

Honestly I only use it when it's something important or I hate the person and want to smack every one of his words, across his face. Otherwise it uses to much energy
It depends...there are some who like you stated have no control over it and overthink things!
Others need to turn it on...For me, I start by giving the benefit of the doubt like to :
I think this is more of an exaggeration...which is VERY common in media articles (more than you would imagine)...Watch the video (post 8) if you understand Urdu

We can "quickly" analyze it:

If it is reported 3000 were killed yet only 2000 were killed...the other 1000 might be killed/ died might be merged in from other cases...

When the media is in a rush to do breaking news- all they do is take the number of deaths in the city and place it all under the same catastrophic (in this case riots) without thinking who died from liver failure or heart attack... some are generous enough to count how many ambulance brought in; but then again this could be a woman in delivery - unrelated to the riots ...this is why it is best to read from multiple resources :)

But if there is more to dig - Like this:
No, it is not about error in estimation. It is probably because the government was honest during the time of 1984 anti-Sikh riots. In 2002, it was hiding the actual death toll. In India, the media is controlled by politicians.


Then I do :D
 
.
I think this is more of an exaggeration...which is VERY common in media articles (more than you would imagine)...Watch the video (post 8) if you understand Urdu

We can "quickly" analyze it:

If it is reported 3000 were killed yet only 2000 were killed...the other 1000 might be killed/ died might be merged in from other cases...

When the media is in a rush to do breaking news- all they do is take the number of deaths in the city and place it all under the same catastrophic (in this case riots) without thinking who died from liver failure or heart attack... some are generous enough to count how many ambulance brought in; but then again this could be a woman in delivery - unrelated to the riots ...this is why it is best to read from multiple resources :)
I think you didn't read the post properly. You just skimmed.

From one single city, the death toll was 3000. An entire Gujarat province's population is much larger. So the death toll also should be proportionally larger. But the media reported it to be less than in the case of Delhi. Not even equal but less!! Height of recklessness in reporting.
 
.
I think you didn't read the post properly. You just skimmed.

From one single city, the death toll was 3000. An entire Gujarat province's population is much larger. So the death toll also should be proportionally larger. But the media reported it to be less than in the case of Delhi. Not even equal but less!! Height of recklessness in reporting.

Ahh yes, I just assume Gujrat was a city (it is in Pakistan)..Well, one could also argue about population (so such comparisons can only be made by those who know something about the 2 places)


Yes, then it is biased reporting as you stated, hiding and yes you cracked the nut!

And yes, I somehow managed to ignore the names of the cities/ province.. my bad!
 
. . .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom