CPC proposes change on Chinese president's term in Constitution

[Reashot Xigwin]

ok, show us how easy it is.

Google is your friend.

 

[ohmrlobalobayeh]

Google is your friend.

u're the 1 making a claim now(that it's 'easy' proving Xi is corrupt):

Proving Xi is corrupt is easy. Whether you believe it or not that's another issue.

A claim needs substantial proof to back up that claim. Thus, the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(law) is on you.

Otherwise, u're tacitly admitting u have no proof- and is merely:

In which case, all the rest of your posts in this thread can be deemed to be as fit as only:

Thanks.

 

[Reashot Xigwin]

Do we have better choice than Xi in CCP?

None I heard of. Xi is an intelligent & charismatic man. His only real problem will be finding a successor to fill his shoes.

 

[Offshore]

u're the 1 making a claim now(that it's 'easy' proving Xi is corrupt):



A claim needs substantial proof to back up that claim. Thus, the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(law) is on you.

Otherwise, u're tacitly admitting u have no proof- and is merely:

In which case, all the rest of your posts in this thread can be deemed to be as fit as only:

Thanks.

lol... that's suits him the most.. lol

 

[liall]

Another dictator?

 

[Bussard Ramjet]

None I heard of. Xi is an intelligent & charismatic man. His only real problem will be finding a successor to fill his shoes.

Well his daughter seems to be the chosen successor.

 

[nang2]

communists never believe check and balance. they certainly don't have the humility to admit that they could be wrong. it is not unique to communists. all collectivist share the same ideological traits. therefore, this news shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone. the original two-term limit was just a pretension anyway. they might have made it a single-term 10-year limit, which would be an excellent choice if treated with sincerity.

 

[noksss]

You have alot of guess and assumputions there, but still Xi's anti-corruption war is much appreicated in China, it will prevent the corruption in China from being completely out-of-control like the wild west US where "lobbying" and "donation" are completely legal and every rich men can send their son/daughters to any ivory schools without much academic merits, and senators works like the servants of their donators etc.

Not sure how much corruption he has reduced but his anti-corruption drive has reduced his number of opponents to zero

 

[Reashot Xigwin]

Well his daughter seems to be the chosen successor.

Remain to be seen... Putting a family in charge will be taken as a clear sign of nepotism. I don't think many in the party will take that lying down.

Although to your point Xi extending his term limits & seizing the leadership of the party. Was unheard of. Then again many of his opponents has been put in jails or dead since he decided to "clear house" so I think we should chalk it up as "quite possibly."

 

[ZeEa5KPul]

communists never believe check and balance.

Nope. "Communists" believe in competence and delivering results. The idea that a system in a state of constant civil war can deliver mediocrity - let alone excellence - is laughable. Witness the results of this deluded belief in that "shining city on a hill."

 

[yantong1980]

I read word "proposed", so the proposal itself automatically being adopted after introduced or there will be discussed first with all CPC regional member? Sorry being not known how CPC work.

 

[Bussard Ramjet]

Do we have better choice than Xi in CCP?

This is what deng said after cultural revolution:

Why is the Central Committee proposing the above changes in the leadership of the State Council?

First of all, it is not good to have an over-concentration of power. It hinders the practice of socialist democracy and of the Party’s democratic centralism, impedes the progress of socialist construction and prevents us from taking full advantage of collective wisdom. Over-concentration of power is liable to give rise to arbitrary rule by individuals at the expense of collective leadership, and it is an important cause of bureaucracy under the present circumstances.

Second, it is not good to have too many people holding two or more posts concurrently or to have too many deputy posts. There is a limit to anyone’s knowledge, experience and energy. If a person holds too many posts at the same time, he will find it difficult to come to grips with the problems in his work and, more important, he will block the way for other more suitable comrades to take up leading posts. Having too many deputy posts leads to low efficiency and contributes to bureaucracy and formalism.

Third, it is time for us to distinguish between the responsibilities of the Party and those of the government and to stop substituting the former for the latter. Those principal leading comrades of the Central Committee who are to be relieved of their concurrent government posts can concentrate their energies on our Party work, on matters concerning the Party’s line, guiding principles and policies. This will help strengthen and improve the unified leadership of the Central Committee, facilitate the establishment of an effective work system at the various levels of government from top to bottom, and promote a better exercise of government functions and powers.

Fourth, we must take the long-term interest into account and solve the problem of the succession in leadership. As precious assets of the Party and state, the older comrades shoulder heavy responsibilities. Their primary task now is to help the Party organizations find worthy successors to work for our cause. This is a solemn duty. It is of great strategic importance for us to ensure the continuity and stability of the correct leadership of our Party and state by having younger comrades take the “front-line” posts while the older comrades give them the necessary advice and support.


https://dengxiaopingworks.wordpress...-of-the-system-of-party-and-state-leadership/

 

[StuartA]

You have alot of guess and assumputions there, but still Xi's anti-corruption war is much appreicated in China, it will prevent the corruption in China from being completely out-of-control like the wild west US where "lobbying" and "donation" are completely legal and every rich men can send their son/daughters to any ivory schools without much academic merits, and senators works like the servants of their donators etc.

You don't know what you are talking about... How can corruption be stopped by one person? Corruption is inevitable in the system of CCP. We can see through this event that the law in China is just a joke, they are only for the people not for the high rank of CCP officers. Xi has showed his true face, a dictator's face. We'll see what comes next in a few years.

 

[ZeEa5KPul]

You don't know what you are talking about

No, I think he does. He seems to know quite a lot.

How can corruption be stopped by one person?

How many angels can dance on the head of a pin? Got any other irrelevant questions?

Corruption is inevitable in the system of CCP

Guess China should just do like the US and legalize corruption.

We can see through this event that the law in China is just a joke

Yeah, I'm not buying your flags, "Stuart". What are you, a expat? Some banana NED/CIA stooge? Out with it! You love transparency, don't you?

We'll see what comes next in a few years.

Let me tell you: nothing. Xi Jinping is going to drive a steamroller over pro-Western traitors and saboteurs and flatten them. You are seen:

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

I'm against the idea, no matter how brilliant he's nor if he's superman, China should give chance for new leaders to learn to governing China, the best is to offer all ex-presidents to play back scene to guide new leaders with his height years of experiences and pass generation to generation their knowledge and wisdom of governing.