What's new

CPC proposes change on Chinese president's term in Constitution

So if you're the soldier going for the war, would you egg Xi into going a war with Taiwan?

No.
What you want to express? I want the world be in peace, I want taiwan be unified, so they can?

If Singapore are in risk to be devided into several part or be invaded by Malay, you choose to flee or fight? don't persuade me, why not you go persuade Taiwanese separatist to get out, don't stop the reunion, or they will die? you don't want China Mainland and Taiwan be reunified?

"Prove" whatever u like on PDF cos PDF cant be censorred by corrupted CPC, no one care. U cant predict when VN in chaos when we all know CN in chaos in 2023 :laugh:
No interested in predict what will happend in VN, you are nobody, who care? tiny VN is somebody, can't attract anyone's eyes, wasting time. You just should know that, even corrupted CPC also can kick you ***, but Vietnamese men just can hide behind women, you should thank war, because of War, Vietnam men can be popular and lazy, live on women. :coffee:
 
.
What you want to express? I want the world be in peace, I want taiwan be unified, so they can?

If Singapore are in risk to be devided into several part or be invaded by Malay, you choose to flee or fight? don't persuade me, why not you go persuade Taiwanese separatist to get out, don't stop the reunion, or they will die? you don't want China Mainland and Taiwan be reunified?


No interested in predict what will happend in VN, you are nobody, who care? tiny VN is somebody, can't attract anyone's eyes, wasting time. You just should know that, even corrupted CPC also can kick you ***, but Vietnamese men just can hide behind women, you should thank war, because of War, Vietnam men can be popular and lazy, live on women. :coffee:
I wanna take TW, I wanna take VNs islands.....but I dont wanna die in battles cos Im coward... blah blah.... haha....but u may die in 2023 chaos, Dud ! :laugh:
 
. .
If Singapore are in risk to be devided into several part or be invaded by Malay, you choose to flee or fight? don't persuade me, why not you go persuade Taiwanese separatist to get out, don't stop the reunion, or they will die? you don't want China Mainland and Taiwan be reunified?

I'm in favour for reunification, because it's beneficial for both sides as well as the region to prosper together.

But the idea of egging Xi getting into war for term extension is silly to me.
 
.
I'm in favour for reunification, because it's beneficial for both sides as well as the region to prosper together.

But the idea of egging Xi getting into war for term extension is silly to me.
You are not Chinese, you don't know the feeling of tolerating the separation between Mainland and Taiwan for about 70 years, and endless delay and argue, Just want to make the long story short. and you also don't bring up any constructive and practical suggest to us to solve the issue, can you?

You Singapore have diplomatic relations with Mainland, meawhile keep the troops and equipment in Taiwan, you really support our reunification? be honest.

Need to say who support reunification of China sincerely? no need to be that hypocratical, most of feigner hope keep the status quo between Mainland and Taiwan, don't be get real reunification, not? you said egging into war is silly to you, but do you know, hypocritical formula also silly to me and most of Chinese.

Being Frank can solve issue and problem quickly and better.:coffee:
 
.
You are not Chinese, you don't know the feeling of tolerating the separation between Mainland and Taiwan for about 70 years, and endless delay and argue, Just want to make the long story short. and you also don't bring up any constructive and practical suggest to us to solve the issue, can you?

You Singapore have diplomatic relations with Mainland, meawhile keep the troops and equipment in Taiwan, you really support our reunification? be honest.

Need to say who support reunification of China sincerely? no need to be that hypocratical, most of feigner hope keep the status quo between Mainland and Taiwan, don't be get real reunification, not? you said egging into war is silly to you, but do you know, hypocritical formula also silly to me and most of Chinese.

Being Frank can solve issue and problem quickly and better.:coffee:
哈哈哈哈哈 请问大哥抽的大麻哪得来的?
 
Last edited:
.
You Singapore have diplomatic relations with Mainland, meawhile keep the troops and equipment in Taiwan, you really support our reunification? be honest.

Military training in Taiwan has nothing got to do with Chinese reunification. We are not going to war for them. Taiwan just serves as one of our overseas training locations due to the lack of space.
 
.
You are not Chinese, you don't know the feeling of tolerating the separation between Mainland and Taiwan for about 70 years, and endless delay and argue, Just want to make the long story short. and you also don't bring up any constructive and practical suggest to us to solve the issue, can you?

You Singapore have diplomatic relations with Mainland, meawhile keep the troops and equipment in Taiwan, you really support our reunification? be honest.

Need to say who support reunification of China sincerely? no need to be that hypocratical, most of feigner hope keep the status quo between Mainland and Taiwan, don't be get real reunification, not? you said egging into war is silly to you, but do you know, hypocritical formula also silly to me and most of Chinese.

Being Frank can solve issue and problem quickly and better.:coffee:
Singaporeans are for peaceful reunification of Taiwan China with Mainland China.
We facilitated meeting between Taiwan China and Mainland China to resolve differences towards final unification.
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/08/...-china-taiwan-meet-shake-hands-singapore.html
Leaders of China and Taiwan Talk of Peace Across the Strait
You Singapore have diplomatic relations with Mainland, meawhile keep the troops and equipment in Taiwan, you really support our reunification? be honest.
I can honestly say we honestly support peaceful unification of Taiwan China with China.
.
 
.
Deng Xiaoping is a far better example, I think Xi want to follow him: retire with good reputation and still have very large influenece even after retirement, afterall, Xi has good characters and is smart, but before that, he need to get his job done.

You might have a good point. However, the main issue here is that even if(that's a big IF) Xi doesn't become power hungry and want to hang on to power for as long as he wants, there is still a high chance that this will happen sooner or latter if a new greedy bad leader takes over and wants to cling on to power for as long as he is alive. This will be possible because Xi has already opened the door for such an eventuality, by removing the terms limit(I already consider it done, since the party representatives/MPs have never in their history voted against an amendment tabled by the leadership/rulers) Xi has already opened the door for such a move in future(that's if he himself doesn't stay in power for decades to come).

China wont have a strongman like Middle-East, to make a strongman in China, you need to do something similiar to Mao/Stalin, Xi has a very very long way to go there even if he wanted that (which I dont believe based on what I heard).
Might be true. However, Xi is already the most powerful Chinese leader since Mao's era. Judging by the fact that he has already consolidated enough power in the party to push forward his political thesis bearing his name, which was thereby written into the party's charter, with Mao the only other leader to have that honour while still alive. Plus, from what I red, he is also adding another amendments to the country's constitution(apart from the term limit being lifted altogether), his "Thought" will also be added into the country's constitution bearing his name. This all shows that he has already amassed enough power, and I don't think there is anybody who is anywhere near strong enough to oppose him(and the party since opposing a strong leader like Xi is like opposing the party itself). So it will be interesting to see how things will unfold this coming decades.

Note how the CCP is way more "heavy" hand during Mao's era than it is now? because in Mao's era, revoluationary generation are usually clean and they fear no backfash.
To be honest with you, You cant compare China of the 1960s to the China of today. Just like you cant compare any developing(and even developed) country of that era to that of today. It was farrrrr more easy for leaders/dictators/authoritarian one party states(they were many of them back then) to be more brutal/heavy handed/ruthless than today. Back then the world was not so interconnected, not as globalised as today, no 24 hours news and many media/tv networks, no social media platforms to share information rapidly around the world etc etc. So there are things leaders/dictators could afford to do to keep power back then without even attracting world attention, things that are almost impossible nowadays. So even if Mao was still the one ruling China today, he too would have been forced to reform and be less heavy handed in other to keep power.

Anti-corruption war make corrupted officials dont dare to opposite him openly, because they know they are dirty and wont surivie throughout investigation, actually corruption make one weak and lost courage to do things.
Huh......Xi himself rose up through the same system they now call corrupt no? Plus how can we be sure he himself hasn't been(is not) corrupt? It's difficult to rise up such a complex political system without having a dirty laundry yourself. At the end of the day if you are not shrewd/smart enough to be ahead of your political rivals, you will end up being the loser with corruption allegations also labelled against you. I'm sure that if Xi had lost the political power game, he too would have been arrested and charged with corruption like many others powerful political leaders who seemed to have lost the power struggle game (Bo Xilai anyone?).

The thing is China already had a stable strong political system of collective and fairly competent/efficient leadership that has been delivering results for a long time now, with constant peaceful transition of power. I don't think Xi is the ONLY ONE who can lead China to a continued prosperous path. People that say that make the party(CCP) look incompetent/powerless and incapable of ruling the country effectively/efficiently without Xi being in charge. I had the impression that China as a big power had already passed that staged of thinking.
 
.
Huh......Xi himself rose up through the same system they now call corrupt no? Plus how can we be sure he himself hasn't been(is not) corrupt? It's difficult to rise up such a complex political system without having a dirty laundry yourself. At the end of the day if you are not shrewd/smart enough to be ahead of your political rivals, you will end up being the loser with corruption allegations also labelled against you. I'm sure that if Xi had lost the political power game, he too would have been arrested and charged with corruption like many others powerful political leaders who seemed to have lost the power struggle game (Bo Xilai anyone?).

The thing is China already had a stable strong political system of collective and fairly competent/efficient leadership that has been delivering results for a long time now, with constant peaceful transition of power. I don't think Xi is the ONLY ONE who can lead China to a continued prosperous path. People that say that make the party(CCP) look incompetent/powerless and incapable of ruling the country effectively/efficiently without Xi being in charge. I had the impression that China as a big power had already passed that staged of thinking.

I dont want to go alot details in China's politics, but it is a well known fact that there is a significant increase on both depth and scales of corruption in China since 1995 or so, espeically after 2005, with the booming of real estate, due to many reasons.

Senior government officials retired before that time wont be capable of being very "corrputed" even if they want, and besides, there are many good people there as well.

And some of the red second generation simply dont want their fathers's country turned into exact the same as their fathers fought against.

As for Xi, well, I am pretty sure he is not corrupted otherwise he would have been removed or even arrested for corruption long before he took the office, actually long before Xi took office, Xi make it very clear once he get the job he will start a war on corruption, and the resistance is very strong to the degree Xi told that he would rather not take the job and just go somewhere to study, so basically end his political career.

It is the senior old reds's strong support make him take office, as for the kind of resistance, we are talking about assisanation or even worse, just imagine that, if Xi was corrupted, his polictical opponents who are in power would
have been take him down through corruption long before he took office, and would have not resort to other means to hit him.
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom