What's new

Court orders Bahrain to pay damages to Iran for 'political expropriation'

Dariush the Great

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
3,182
Reaction score
-12
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
Netherlands
News / Economy / Editor's Choice
Court orders Bahrain to pay damages to Iran for 'political expropriation'
Wednesday, 24 November 2021 11:37 AM [ Last Update: Wednesday, 24 November 2021 12:22 PM ]

US Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) (L) talks with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) during a rally with fellow Democrats before voting on H.R. 1, or the People Act, on the East Steps of the US Capitol on March 08, 2019 in Washington, DC. (AFP photo)

Future Bank had been established as a joint venture between Bahrain’s Ahli United Bank and Bank Melli and Bank Saderat of Iran in 2004.
Bahrain has been ordered by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague to pay over 200 million euros in damages plus costs to two Iranian banks for the unlawful expropriation of their banking venture in Manama in an act of "political retribution".
Iran’s largest lenders Bank Melli and Bank Saderat had sued the tiny Persian Gulf country before the international arbitration court in the Netherlands for confiscating nearly $1.3 billion worth of Iranian funds.
The funds belonged to Future Bank established as a joint venture between Bahrain’s Ahli United Bank and the two Iranian lenders in 2004 when Bahraini leaders were seeking to mend strained relations with their vastly larger neighbor to the north.
In January 2016, however, Bahrain's central bank said it was taking steps to close down Future Bank after Manama cut diplomatic ties with Tehran, following its neighbor Saudi Arabia in severing relations with the Islamic Republic.
In July this year, Bahrain's top court upheld a money-laundering verdict against Future Bank, the Central Bank of Iran and other Iranian banks. The ruling, issued in April 2018, included jail terms of up to 10 years for Future Bank officials and confiscation of funds.
Iranian officials rejected the allegations, asserting that Future Bank was a victim of an international political conflict, instigated by Persian Gulf neighbors and other countries seeking to isolate Iran.
“There is no evidence, nor was there even an allegation, including in the ongoing arbitration, of corruption, let alone of a ‘multibillion-dollar corruption scheme,’” a joint statement issued by Bank Melli and Bank Saderat said at the time, referring to Bahrain's characterization of the case.
Both denied any improper conduct in the handling of financial transfers, asserting that Future Bank promptly responded to all concerns expressed by the host country, “without further complaint from Bahrain,” according to the statement.
“Nor is there, or has Bahrain ever put forward, any evidence of Future Bank having financed any money-laundering, terrorism, nuclear activities, or having allowed companies to operate as fronts for Iran’s Islamic Revolution Guards Corps,” the banks said.
The statement described the Iranian institutions as “collateral victims of an entirely political decision, taken in the context of tensions and efforts by some Arab countries, led by Saudi Arabia, to isolate Iran.”
“It is in this context that Bahrain targeted not just these banks but all Iranian interests on its territory,” the statement said.
Iran cenbank launches legal action against Bahrain over confiscated funds
Iran cenbank launches legal action against Bahrain over confiscated funds
Iran’s central bank has started taking legal action against Bahrain over a judicial move to seize funds.

In a written summation to the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, the kingdom had asserted that “Bahrain has never faced violations of this magnitude”.
The international tribunal, however, decided Monday that the Iranian institutions had been the target of "political retribution" and ordered Bahrain to pay over 200 million euros in damages plus costs to the banks, London-based Global Arbitration Review, a magazine dedicated to commercial arbitration, reported.
Iran's former central bank governor Abdolnaser Hemmati confirmed the news on Wednesday, hailing it as a victory for the country.
"A legal victory: With the many years of effort we have had, an international arbitration tribunal has condemned the Bahraini government, which had expropriated Bank Melli and Bank Saderat of their venture in Future Bank of Bahrain with a political motivation and violation of international laws, to paying more than 200 million euros in damages and arbitration costs," he tweeted.
یک پیروزی حقوقی:
با تلاش چندساله ای که داشتیم،یک دادگاه داوری بین المللی #_دولت_بحرین راکه باهدف سیاسی ونقض قوانین بین المللی، سرمایه‌گذاری بانکهای ملی وصادرات در #_فیوچر_بانک بحرین راسلب مالکیت کرده بود،به پرداخت بیش از ۲۰۰میلیون یورو غرامت به اضافه هزینه‌های دادرسی محکوم کرد.
— عبدالناصر همتی (@Hemmati_ir) November 24, 2021
The accusations emerged from an intensive investigation that began after Bahraini regulators formally closed Future Bank in 2015. The closure prompted Future Bank’s two Iranian shareholders to file a complaint in The Hague accusing Bahrain of improperly shutting down the bank and demanding the return of frozen assets.
In response, Bahrain submitted hundreds of pages that tried to paint a portrait of a financial institution operating mainly with “the aim of concealment,” the documents stated.
The audit “revealed crimes and violations of Bahraini and international law of massive proportions,” Bahraini Foreign Minister Khalid bin Ahmed al-Khalifa was quoted as saying at the time. He said criminal proceedings were underway in Bahrain and that the results of the investigation were being shared with other capitals, because they will “also be of concern to the international community.”
Bahrain's case was supported by US officials who said the "findings" were troubling at a time when Future Bank was under intense scrutiny by American and Bahraini government agencies.
As part of its draconian sanctions regime, the US has accused Bank Melli and Bank Saderat of helping finance Iran’s nuclear program and what it says is a terrorism network, in reference to resistance groups such as Lebanon's Hezbollah.
The US Navy's Fifth Fleet is based in Bahrain where its majority-Shia population has close cultural and religious ties to Iran, but the kingdom’s ruling family has closely aligned itself with Saudi Arabia.
Since 2011, the Bahraini regime has struggled to contain a resistance movement that includes peaceful dissenters. It has repeatedly accused Iran of backing the popular struggle against the monarchy, but its actions to stifle opposition groups have led to international criticism over its brutal crackdown on protests and other human rights violations.
One of the controversial allegations in the Future Bank case involved top Bahraini cleric Sheikh Isa Qassim. Bahraini officials criticized Future Bank for allowing him to make cash deposits in the bank. US investigators, however, found that the cash consisted of tithes and alms collected from worshipers under a Shia tradition known as khums which is spent for charitable reasons to eliminate poverty and assist the most vulnerable classes.


 
News / Economy / Editor's Choice
Court orders Bahrain to pay damages to Iran for 'political expropriation'
Wednesday, 24 November 2021 11:37 AM [ Last Update: Wednesday, 24 November 2021 12:22 PM ]

US Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) (L) talks with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) during a rally with fellow Democrats before voting on H.R. 1, or the People Act, on the East Steps of the US Capitol on March 08, 2019 in Washington, DC. (AFP photo)

Future Bank had been established as a joint venture between Bahrain’s Ahli United Bank and Bank Melli and Bank Saderat of Iran in 2004.
Bahrain has been ordered by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague to pay over 200 million euros in damages plus costs to two Iranian banks for the unlawful expropriation of their banking venture in Manama in an act of "political retribution".
Iran’s largest lenders Bank Melli and Bank Saderat had sued the tiny Persian Gulf country before the international arbitration court in the Netherlands for confiscating nearly $1.3 billion worth of Iranian funds.
The funds belonged to Future Bank established as a joint venture between Bahrain’s Ahli United Bank and the two Iranian lenders in 2004 when Bahraini leaders were seeking to mend strained relations with their vastly larger neighbor to the north.
In January 2016, however, Bahrain's central bank said it was taking steps to close down Future Bank after Manama cut diplomatic ties with Tehran, following its neighbor Saudi Arabia in severing relations with the Islamic Republic.
In July this year, Bahrain's top court upheld a money-laundering verdict against Future Bank, the Central Bank of Iran and other Iranian banks. The ruling, issued in April 2018, included jail terms of up to 10 years for Future Bank officials and confiscation of funds.
Iranian officials rejected the allegations, asserting that Future Bank was a victim of an international political conflict, instigated by Persian Gulf neighbors and other countries seeking to isolate Iran.
“There is no evidence, nor was there even an allegation, including in the ongoing arbitration, of corruption, let alone of a ‘multibillion-dollar corruption scheme,’” a joint statement issued by Bank Melli and Bank Saderat said at the time, referring to Bahrain's characterization of the case.
Both denied any improper conduct in the handling of financial transfers, asserting that Future Bank promptly responded to all concerns expressed by the host country, “without further complaint from Bahrain,” according to the statement.
“Nor is there, or has Bahrain ever put forward, any evidence of Future Bank having financed any money-laundering, terrorism, nuclear activities, or having allowed companies to operate as fronts for Iran’s Islamic Revolution Guards Corps,” the banks said.
The statement described the Iranian institutions as “collateral victims of an entirely political decision, taken in the context of tensions and efforts by some Arab countries, led by Saudi Arabia, to isolate Iran.”
“It is in this context that Bahrain targeted not just these banks but all Iranian interests on its territory,” the statement said.
Iran cenbank launches legal action against Bahrain over confiscated funds
Iran cenbank launches legal action against Bahrain over confiscated funds
Iran’s central bank has started taking legal action against Bahrain over a judicial move to seize funds.

In a written summation to the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, the kingdom had asserted that “Bahrain has never faced violations of this magnitude”.
The international tribunal, however, decided Monday that the Iranian institutions had been the target of "political retribution" and ordered Bahrain to pay over 200 million euros in damages plus costs to the banks, London-based Global Arbitration Review, a magazine dedicated to commercial arbitration, reported.
Iran's former central bank governor Abdolnaser Hemmati confirmed the news on Wednesday, hailing it as a victory for the country.
"A legal victory: With the many years of effort we have had, an international arbitration tribunal has condemned the Bahraini government, which had expropriated Bank Melli and Bank Saderat of their venture in Future Bank of Bahrain with a political motivation and violation of international laws, to paying more than 200 million euros in damages and arbitration costs," he tweeted.

The accusations emerged from an intensive investigation that began after Bahraini regulators formally closed Future Bank in 2015. The closure prompted Future Bank’s two Iranian shareholders to file a complaint in The Hague accusing Bahrain of improperly shutting down the bank and demanding the return of frozen assets.
In response, Bahrain submitted hundreds of pages that tried to paint a portrait of a financial institution operating mainly with “the aim of concealment,” the documents stated.
The audit “revealed crimes and violations of Bahraini and international law of massive proportions,” Bahraini Foreign Minister Khalid bin Ahmed al-Khalifa was quoted as saying at the time. He said criminal proceedings were underway in Bahrain and that the results of the investigation were being shared with other capitals, because they will “also be of concern to the international community.”
Bahrain's case was supported by US officials who said the "findings" were troubling at a time when Future Bank was under intense scrutiny by American and Bahraini government agencies.
As part of its draconian sanctions regime, the US has accused Bank Melli and Bank Saderat of helping finance Iran’s nuclear program and what it says is a terrorism network, in reference to resistance groups such as Lebanon's Hezbollah.
The US Navy's Fifth Fleet is based in Bahrain where its majority-Shia population has close cultural and religious ties to Iran, but the kingdom’s ruling family has closely aligned itself with Saudi Arabia.
Since 2011, the Bahraini regime has struggled to contain a resistance movement that includes peaceful dissenters. It has repeatedly accused Iran of backing the popular struggle against the monarchy, but its actions to stifle opposition groups have led to international criticism over its brutal crackdown on protests and other human rights violations.
One of the controversial allegations in the Future Bank case involved top Bahraini cleric Sheikh Isa Qassim. Bahraini officials criticized Future Bank for allowing him to make cash deposits in the bank. US investigators, however, found that the cash consisted of tithes and alms collected from worshipers under a Shia tradition known as khums which is spent for charitable reasons to eliminate poverty and assist the most vulnerable classes.


Iran should take back the entire Bahrain..it belonged to Iran any way.
 
Aren't you ashamed man? Some white people from other side of the world defending you?
Historically smaller countries have always relied on larger countries to protect them, so not really.

You expect a country that has a couple million people and is barely 60 years old to defend itself against a country much older and with a much larger population?
 
Historically smaller countries have always relied on larger countries to protect them, so not really.

You expect a country that has a couple million people and is barely 60 years old to defend itself against a country much older and with a much larger population?
There are 22 Arab countries in the world versus 1 Iran. Are you telling me 22 Arab nations have been struggling to confront just one single Iran? Isn't this the height of incompetency? Like i said, rely on yourselves rather than outsiders.
 
Bahrain is part of the Peninsula shield Iran will be smoked into the outer orbit.. The US is entirely irrelevant and Bahrain doesn't need defense against anyone in the area.. Egypt, Jordan, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman and Bahrain
America will fiercely defend Bahrain because of its strategic value as a port for the 5th fleet.

Go ahead 🙂

This is an idiotic answer and less informed... The Peninsula shield is capable of smoking anyone into the outer orbit
 
Last edited:
This is an idiotic answer and less informed
It is not an idiotic answer, America would help defend Bahrain just like it defended Kuwait in 1991.
There are 22 Arab countries in the world versus 1 Iran. Are you telling me 22 Arab nations have been struggling to confront just one single Iran? Isn't this the height of incompetency? Like i said, rely on yourselves rather than outsiders.
22 Arab countries are not magically united on a front, and are very spread out geographically.

Iran has a far larger population, and has independent for far longer than all of the countries in the Peninsula which realistically is the only region that would help defend Bahrain.
 
It is not an idiotic answer, America would help defend Bahrain just like it defended Kuwait in 1991.

It technically would but it is not needed at this point in time as Peninsula shield is strong and Bahrain has a stronger alliance than Iran anyway which is why Iran doesn't pose a threat..

Peninsula shield + 5 could invade Iran tomorrow if they wanted it..

Peninsual SHEILD (Has alone 1mio active armed forces + 1m another reserve) If you add Egypt, Jordan, Sudan we could reach around 4mio active without accouting the reservers plus on top of that fighter jets they could field 3000 fighter jets not even the Americans have that many and everything is high quality. they have manpower approx 300-400m they could fight a long drawn out war if it even was necessary
 
Last edited:
Bahrain is part of the Peninsula shield Iran will be smoked into the outer orbit.. The US is entirely irrelevant and Bahrain doesn't need defense against anyone in the area.. Egypt, Jordan, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman and Bahrain


This is an idiotic answer and less informed... The Peninsula shield is capable of smoking anyone into the outer orbit
Arab coalition struggles for almost 7 years to defeat a bunch of sandal wearing Yemenis despite having full technological support and latest American weaponry and financial support.

Arab coalition is only good for making Sheikh bellies bigger and hire Russian prostitutes.
 
It technically would but it is not needed at this point in time as Peninsula shield is strong and Bahrain has a stronger alliance than Iran anyway which is why Iran doesn't pose a threat..

Peninsula shield + 5 could invade Iran tomorrow if they wanted it..

Peninsual SHEILD (Has alone 1mio active armed forces + 1m another reserve) If you add Egypt, Jordan, Sudan we could reach around 4mio active without accouting the reservers plus on top of that fighter jets they could field 3000 fighter jets not even the Americans have that many and everything is high quality. they have manpower approx 300-400m they could fight a long drawn out war if it even was necessary

That bla bla shield tried it's luck against Yemenis.
 
Arab coalition struggles for almost 7 years to defeat a bunch of sandal wearing Yemenis despite having full technological support and latest American weaponry and financial support.

Arab coalition is only good for making Sheikh bellies bigger and hire Russian prostitutes.

You are taking a civil war insurgency comparsiion with conventional war.. You lost wars to Sadam Hussien who has like 5 times less population and including to non-state actors in Syria..

Logistically I swear to god Peninsula shield could complete a military invasion on IRan successfully..

Iran is one of the easiest countries to invade and occupy historically.. Anyone who thinks the Peninsula Shield can't complete an invasion on Iran is deluded..

They could come from multiple axis at one point it would be quick incursion Iran will be exuhausted
 
GCC needs to invest in more BMD and anti UAV/cruise missile strikes in order to survive Iranian missile M1 spam.

Skyknight should be good enough for surviving a moderate attack from CM/UAVs if the radar sensors are good. 80 missiles in air simultaneously with 240 missiles in the container.

UAE has the money to invest in a BMD using South African engineers in the next 5 years.
 
Back
Top Bottom