What's new

Contextualizing Swift Retort: Surprise within, shock without

@WebMaster @The Eagle @waz @Irfan Baloch @Slav Defence @jaibi @Socra can someone please lock this thread? It is way past its useful discussion. This is the reason why I suggested the option of creating locked threads so no discussion can take place at all.
I hear you and others too.
I wont lock a thread just on the pure difference of opinion.

what you have is an opinion and you base it on an assumption which is fine for the sake of argument and thats where this will bring posts with all varied views.

yes if its derailed to infinity and is causing disruption in moderating then it can be locked otherwise it just vanishes as the interest vanishes over time.
 
@WebMaster @The Eagle @waz @Irfan Baloch @Slav Defence @jaibi @Socra can someone please lock this thread? It is way past its useful discussion. This is the reason why I suggested the option of creating locked threads so no discussion can take place at all.

Lets be open to take back what you throw at first, to the members. Following are your words and it was already way past the logical OP to begin with... hence, I always insist everyone to at-least create a clean OP and not to attract political mudslinging just for the sake of quality arguments.

The Prime Minister Imran Khan, well known for his subservience to foreign interests

Do you know how you provoked many with this statement alone.... I am not a PTI fan nor supporter but there is no rule of locked threads unless Staff Members/Administration has to make an announcement.
 
Lets be open to take back what you throw at first, to the members. Following are your words and it was already way past the logical OP to begin with... hence, I always insist everyone to at-least create a clean OP and not to attract political mudslinging just for the sake of quality arguments.



Do you know how you provoked many with this statement alone.... I am not a PTI fan nor supporter but there is no rule of locked threads unless Staff Members/Administration has to make an announcement.

And you think I am shying away from a debate? There are some topics that are best mentioned, then left undiscussed. It takes a certain level of mental maturity to realize this and practice it. And it takes understanding of human character to realize how some people are sold on a point. When the conclusion is already drawn, the debate is just a point scoring match. I want the ability to make this judgement and limit discussion.
 
The piece written by @CriticalThought is of very high standard.
PAF to intentionally miss ground targets was a carefully chosen move to not to escalate to a full frontal War but letting go of aerial targets and targets of opportunity was extreme cautious bordering cowardice. You never do that when your response was a perfectly legit one.
 
Much ink has been split to retrace the events leading up to and following Swift Retort (SR). So far, all such efforts portray SR as a knee jerk response to Indian aggression following the Pulwama attack. In this article, I would like to contextualize SR in the larger sequence of events. This will enable us to derive the full significance of PAF's swift retort to both the Indian barb and Pakistani lethargy.

The months, and not just days, leading up to SR saw an increasingly belligerent Indian military and air force. The bowing out of COAS General Raheel Sharif and ACM Sohail Aman brought a season change to Pakistan's outward projection of military might. The last test of any new Pakistani missile with strategic significance was of Ababeel in January 2017, shortly after Bajwa came into office. Indeed, the few months that elapsed between Bajwa's appointment and the Ababeel test do not provide any grounds for crediting Bajwa with a strategic vision. The entirety of Bajwa's legacy is filled with tests of naval cruise and surface to surface missiles of assorted types, along with tactical ballistic missile tests/exercises carried out by the Pakistan army. By mid 2018, the lack of any grandiose strategic posturing was accompanied by an almost pin drop silence from the office of the newly appointed Air Chief Marshal Mujahid Anwar Khan - a gentleman and professional of the highest caliber, who believes in action on the battlefield and gelid reserve during peace.

In this backdrop, India continued an astounding accretion of strategic weapons such as nuclear submarines and strategic missiles with 5000+ km range. This was expected and in line with Indian hegemonic designs which it has openly expressed for a long time. But a surprising development was the sudden, and rather churlish, assertiveness of the loud mouthed Indian Air Force Chief B. S. Dhanoa. In presentations and statements, the Indian chief expressed readiness of his air force to fight the combined aerial might of both China and Pakistan. As we shall see, this would later provide comic relief to the rugged heights of Swift Retort.

For purposes of contextualization, we choose three significant events involving the Indian air force. The first is Exercise Gagan Shakti, in which IAF exercised its entire machinery, from logistics to fighter jets. The culmination of Gagan Shakti saw a heightened confidence in the Indian air force, with claims of 11000 sorties involving the full gamut of aircrafts at its disposal, and validation of plans to fight a two front war with both China and Pakistan. Indian journalists and political leaders were treated to low grade military pornography in the form of marquee Indian fighters dropping air to ground loads under quite unremarkable conditions.

The second event is participation of Indian air force in Exercise Pitch Black held in Australia. This was the first time IAF was participating in this particular exercise. As such, it was a chance for the newly ascendant IAF to express its relevance in international geo-politics, and send a strong signal in the rising tensions around the South China Sea. It projected India's image as a coalition partner, and reinforced the capability of India's Russian aircraft to inter-operate with Western equipment.

The third and final event of significance is COPE India 2018 held in Dec, just two months from Swift Retort. The exercise is best summarized in the words of U.S. Air Force Gen. CQ Brown, Jr., PACAF commander

“These exercise scenarios challenged us to be agile in execution, innovative in our approach and integrated in our command and control…enhancing the readiness and lethality of our Airmen and our allies and partners.”
https://www.pacaf.af.mil/News/Artic...ust-cooperation-between-us-indian-air-forces/

At this point, I invite the reader to pay special attention to COPE India 2018 held in Dec 2018, and Falcon Talon III, a joint exercise between USAF and Pakistan Air Force held in Jan 2019, a month before the events of Swift Retort. Both exercises involved large number of aircrafts from the host countries. Both exercises provided ultimate opportunity to American analysts to gauge the level of preparation of IAF and PAF. And yet, by Feb 2019, we see no change in IAF's bellicose posture. Did the Americans not share PAF capabilities with their IAF friends? Did they knowingly downplayed Pakistani capabilities? Or did IAF simply failed to on-board the information provided by the Americans? These are questions whose answers we may never know.

What we do know, is that as the early hours of Feb 26 2019 approached, the Indian media machinery was in full swing ratcheting up war hysteria in the Indian population. Television anchors were sharing military plans that seemed to have been provided to them by professional analysts. Politicians were baying for blood. And the hypocrite Modi was absorbed in nurturing his image as servant of the people, washing feet of sanitary workers. This outward display of nonchalance and unfazed composure accompanied an inner turmoil arising from pontificating upon the impact of clouds on Pakistani radars. Alas, for Modi, neither humility nor bravado would be the saving grace.

But let us look at the perceptions of PAF prior to Operation Swift Retort. The complete lack of any strategic posture by the military, the placating, soothing appeasement by the government, and an open admittance of economic disaster, combined to project a very bleak picture of the PAF. Much of the world considered PAF to be outdated and outnumbered by the PAF. The Indian propaganda machine had been successful in solidifying the image of Su-30 in the minds of everyday Pakistanis as a potent force that could rule the skies of South Asia without challenge. The PAF's absence from the Kargil conflict, and India's bold and confrontational act of shooting down an unarmed naval plane within Pakistani borders had shaped up Pakistani psyche. The American raid on Abbottabad had been the final nail in the coffin that had sealed PAF's image as being unable to protect the country's borders. The Prime Minister Imran Khan, well known for his subservience to foreign interests, and his complete illiteracy at all matters pertaining to armed conflict, would parrot whatever phrases were given to him. And much of the Pakistani military establishment viewed PAF with doubt due to the aforementioned events.

As the morning of Feb 26 approached, there were possibly only three entities in the world that had a full understanding of PAF's true capabilities. The PAF itself, the PLAAF with which PAF has conducted wide ranging exercises and which has supplied PAF with a large portion of its inventory through purchases and join ventures, and finally, the USAF which has trained PAF and given it the sharp edge of the fabled Katana. It should be noted that the case of USAF is ambiguous because PAF has (at least officially) kept its Chinese and Western capabilities compartmentalized during international exercises.

Thus, once the failed Indian airstrike had taken place, Imran Khan had absolutely no clue what he was about to unleash as he approved the proportional response by targeting but not destroying Indian targets. And Bajwa would be forced to shows his true leanings by restricting PAF Shaheens from turning the skies of Kashmir into a slaughterhouse. Indian air force was caught pants down and exposed to the world.

But with traitors at the helm of Pakistani affairs, the clear aerial victory was not capitalized upon. Pakistani leaders fanned Indian belligerence through appeasement and a quick and meek release of the captured Indian pilot Abhinandan. Thus, what should have been a decisive victory in the skies of Kashmir, expanded into naval staring match in which India blinked, and reports of military conflict along the Sialkot border that was blacked out from media reporting.

The aftermath of Swift Retort saw India chastised yet belligerent, and the Pakistani nation oblivious to the meek capitulation by its leaders. The uneducated nation was easily led by mere words and promises of Pakistan's 'moral supremacy'. All the while, Pakistan's vested interests were sabotaged through a comedy in the United Nations where superfluous claims of ecological terrorism were launched despite Pakistan's right to invoke the Security Council to protest the violation of its territorial sovereignty. Otherwise educated Pakistanis acted as the guardians and emissaries of the deceitful Khan, explaining away all actions as Khan's supreme leadership and magnanimous personality. The net outcome being India's abrogation of Article 370, and France, Britain, and America combining to pressurize Pakistan through FATF.

Finally, one interesting event post Swift Retort was the participation of JF-17 in the Turkish Anatolian Eagle exercise along with F-15s of the American air force. Once the Thunder had delivered the shock during Swift Retort, PAF allowed the Americans to get a first hand interaction. And for the Americans to send their air superiority fighter, with a track record of 104 to nil, is quite flattering for the Thunder.

Now that the enemy has been shocked, and traitors within Pakistan have been surprised, PAF has been given the glorious and monumental task of ensuring Pakistan's independence from foreign vendors and increasing self-reliance through innovative research. The ACM Mujahid Anwar Khan has expressed the resolve to acquire whatever technologies are needed to match India's procurements. Pakistani and Chinese air forces conducted Shaheen-VIII to on-board the lessons learnt from Swift Retort. The Chinese J-10 fighters have provided with a realistic simulation of the Rafale threat. The Rafale manufacturing factory in France has come under an espionage attack. And Pakistan's growing closeness to Qatar has opened another avenue for Pakistan to learn more about this upcoming threat.

Meanwhile, the enemy has also been active. Indian air force chief has visited Sweden, the country of origin of Pakistan's large fleet of Erieye AEWACS systems. He has also paid a visit to Egypt, another Muslim country that fields Rafales. Defence cooperation is increasing between America and India, especially in the aerospace sector. India is set to acquire American UCAVs, attack helis, and SAM system using AMRAAM missiles. India is doing everything possible to counter PAF's technical edge.

The future looks good for aerial warfare in South Asia. The purveyors of 'finest military aircraft technology' must indeed be rejoicing, even as billions of people are pushed further into poverty, and Muslims are oppressed and marginalized throughout the world.
Please add the image.Nicely written and let some spew nonsense.I want to see how useless they can get :)
Thread has been set as featured and added in the competition-
regards
 
ut let us look at the perceptions of PAF prior to Operation Swift Retort. The complete lack of any strategic posture by the military, the placating, soothing appeasement by the government, and an open admittance of economic disaster, combined to project a very bleak picture of the PAF. Much of the world considered PAF to be outdated and outnumbered by the PAF.
I think there is a typo. you meant to say IAF? I have changed the last word to IAF

Much of the world considered PAF to be outdated and outnumbered by the IAF. The Indian propaganda machine had been successful in solidifying the image of Su-30 in the minds of everyday Pakistanis as a potent force that could rule the skies of South Asia without challenge. The PAF's absence from the Kargil conflict, and India's bold and confrontational act of shooting down an unarmed naval plane within Pakistani borders had shaped up Pakistani psyche. The American raid on Abbottabad had been the final nail in the coffin that had sealed PAF's image as being unable to protect the country's borders.
for me the worse time was the continued Salala base attack by Americans where they kept returning to show us that they didnt attack by mistake and meant to kill everyone there. throughout the entire event the PAF was no where to be seen while their fellow army men were unable to defend themselves due to lack of air defence weapons or cover.

The Prime Minister Imran Khan, well known for his subservience to foreign interests, and his complete illiteracy at all matters pertaining to armed conflict, would parrot whatever phrases were given to him.

I have difference of opinion here. Imran has been such a harsh critic of American invasion of Afghanistan and its Drone program that he was dubbed as Taliban Khan. this is hardly subservience, he built and strengthened the anti American and Anti Pakistan army sentiment during the early to mid 2000s for its participation in American war of terror. as far as his ignorance regarding strategic security affairs and international politics and diplomacy is concerned there are no two views there here the failure lies with the establishment as well for failing to brief him on those subjects no able foreign and strategic policy professional from the ministries and security establishment helped here. they are meant to give daily briefs and in depth analysis, help in writing the diplomatic text and any speech of national importance. but it seemed that Imran has so far just continued his habit of saying his few lines after a cricket match. for this failure alone the policy advisers and helpers should be whipped and sacked. they have the substance, power and command to change and shape the mind of any ruler with their power of persuasion no matter how single minded he is.

Thus, once the failed Indian airstrike had taken place, Imran Khan had absolutely no clue what he was about to unleash as he approved the proportional response by targeting but not destroying Indian targets. And Bajwa would be forced to shows his true leanings by restricting PAF Shaheens from turning the skies of Kashmir into a slaughterhouse.
I tend to agree with the analysis here. had it been IAF that had locked on our multiple jets its a given that they would've shot them all down. our claim of locking but not shooting down the Indian jets are only as good as sea stories. shooting down more IAF jets would've definitely resulted in grounding of IAF Mig 21s and they wont have parroted the shooting down of PAF jet nor would've taken the annexation step. morality and its superiority is worth no more than used toilet paper as shown by our great Arab Brothers who showed clear tilt towards India due to their economic and diplomatic interests. the way UAE and KSA shunned us and gave red carpet reception to India just goes to show where does Imran's peaceful gesture and moral superiority stands in the eyes of the world.
 
But let us look at the perceptions of PAF prior to Operation Swift Retort. The complete lack of any strategic posture by the military, the placating, soothing appeasement by the government, and an open admittance of economic disaster, combined to project a very bleak picture of the PAF. Much of the world considered PAF to be outdated and outnumbered by the IAF. The Indian propaganda machine had been successful in solidifying the image of Su-30 in the minds of everyday Pakistanis as a potent force that could rule the skies of South Asia without challenge. The PAF's absence from the Kargil conflict, and India's bold and confrontational act of shooting down an unarmed naval plane within Pakistani borders had shaped up Pakistani psyche. The American raid on Abbottabad had been the final nail in the coffin that had sealed PAF's image as being unable to protect the country's borders.

A well written and thought out Article...Thumbs up! i have suggestion to remind the readers subject paragraph should include salala incident and 2008 Arial Intrusions by IAF.
 
I tend to agree with the analysis here. had it been IAF that had locked on our multiple jets its a given that they would've shot them all down. our claim of locking but not shooting down the Indian jets are only as good as sea stories. shooting down more IAF jets would've definitely resulted in grounding of IAF Mig 21s and they wont have parroted the shooting down of PAF jet nor would've taken the annexation step. morality and its superiority is worth no more than used toilet paper as shown by our great Arab Brothers who showed clear tilt towards India due to their economic and diplomatic interests. the way UAE and KSA shunned us and gave red carpet reception to India just goes to show where does Imran's peaceful gesture and moral superiority stands in the eyes of the world.
Very few men in uniform can be ace spies,diplomats and negotiators when it comes to maintaining passable amount of maneuverability for statecraft nothing less than ace men managing these affairs would work.
Appeasement policy is not going to take us anywhere except in a corner,we have seen where this policy took us when we pitted it infront of extremist at home turf, we paid a heavy price.Right now people across the border are a version of what we were dealing few years ago in Pakistan.
 
Last edited:
Very few men in uniform can be ace spies,diplomats and negotiators when it comes to maintaining passable amount maneuverability for statecraft nothing less than ace men managing these affairs would work.
Appeasement policy is not going to take us in a corner,we have seen where this policy took us when we pitted it infront of extremist at home turf, we paid a heavy price.Right now people across the border are a version of what we were dealing few years ago in Pakistan.

Apart from good primary I studied in state schools so I never managed to express so eloquently as you did
I assume you are referring to that shameless thug of red mosque . the place that invites Daesh openly and continues ti poison the citizens with its takfiri anti state propaganda.


that whole episode boils my blood and i wish we had saudis or Iranians as leaders and they wouldve made an example out of him instead of appeasement
 
Apart from good primary I studied in state schools so I never managed to express so eloquently as you did
I assume you are referring to that shameless thug of red mosque . the place that invites Daesh openly and continues ti poison the citizens with its takfiri anti state propaganda.


that whole episode boils my blood and i wish we had saudis or Iranians as leaders and they wouldve made an example out of him instead of appeasement
But we never stopped there,from lal Masjid this policy of went to Mountains of North,than to frontiers in West and Beyond and finally now is going across borders in East.
Just sitting for few moments and calculating what we have got using this policy may be we would come to senses,as for as i am concerned i havn't seen any good coming out of this so far.
 
Please add the image.Nicely written and let some spew nonsense.I want to see how useless they can get :)
Thread has been set as featured and added in the competition-
regards

Sir, I am both humbled and honored. But I must emphasize that entering and winning competitions is not my aim, and never has been. For me, the biggest prize would be a Pakistan that is a true Fortress of Islam. I humbly request to kindly take me out of the competition.

Lets be open to take back what you throw at first, to the members. Following are your words and it was already way past the logical OP to begin with... hence, I always insist everyone to at-least create a clean OP and not to attract political mudslinging just for the sake of quality arguments.



Do you know how you provoked many with this statement alone.... I am not a PTI fan nor supporter but there is no rule of locked threads unless Staff Members/Administration has to make an announcement.

I was trying to avoid details, but in order to counter what you have said, I will need to painstakingly clarify many things. This will take multiple articles. But let me forewarn you that your allegations are baseless. I do not engage in political mudslinging, and if I did, there would be muck on every Pakistani leader starting from Musharraf and ending with Khan and Bajwa.
 

Just state yourself and that's all. What's that with forewarn this & that.


there would be muck on every Pakistani leader starting from Musharraf and ending with Khan and Bajwa.

Everyone has much to prove against others and in-fact when it comes to politicians; one cannot count them saints. The point being raised is that, when a person is starting an argument in broader yet productive prospect; never name one evil or attract political fest. Once you have stated whatever you wanted, let others discuss and such censorship cannot be applied here. Stay with your argument without enforcing on others and that's all.
 
I think there is a typo. you meant to say IAF? I have changed the last word to IAF


for me the worse time was the continued Salala base attack by Americans where they kept returning to show us that they didnt attack by mistake and meant to kill everyone there. throughout the entire event the PAF was no where to be seen while their fellow army men were unable to defend themselves due to lack of air defence weapons or cover.



I have difference of opinion here. Imran has been such a harsh critic of American invasion of Afghanistan and its Drone program that he was dubbed as Taliban Khan. this is hardly subservience, he built and strengthened the anti American and Anti Pakistan army sentiment during the early to mid 2000s for its participation in American war of terror. as far as his ignorance regarding strategic security affairs and international politics and diplomacy is concerned there are no two views there here the failure lies with the establishment as well for failing to brief him on those subjects no able foreign and strategic policy professional from the ministries and security establishment helped here. they are meant to give daily briefs and in depth analysis, help in writing the diplomatic text and any speech of national importance. but it seemed that Imran has so far just continued his habit of saying his few lines after a cricket match. for this failure alone the policy advisers and helpers should be whipped and sacked. they have the substance, power and command to change and shape the mind of any ruler with their power of persuasion no matter how single minded he is.


I tend to agree with the analysis here. had it been IAF that had locked on our multiple jets its a given that they would've shot them all down. our claim of locking but not shooting down the Indian jets are only as good as sea stories. shooting down more IAF jets would've definitely resulted in grounding of IAF Mig 21s and they wont have parroted the shooting down of PAF jet nor would've taken the annexation step. morality and its superiority is worth no more than used toilet paper as shown by our great Arab Brothers who showed clear tilt towards India due to their economic and diplomatic interests. the way UAE and KSA shunned us and gave red carpet reception to India just goes to show where does Imran's peaceful gesture and moral superiority stands in the eyes of the world.

This requires entire articles to properly respond. But let me summarize and say that the act of not shooting down multiple aircrafts in itself doesn't constitute treason. Had we been able to curb Indian belligerence, and the aftermath of Feb 27 saw India brought to its knees, Pakistan freed from FATF blackmail by India, I would never complain. But the manner in which Modi's election has been facilitated, India's membership to Security Council has been backed, head has been bowed to Indian blackmail in FATF and much more, all of this combines with the order of not shooting down Indian planes and taken together, constitutes solid evidence of treason.
 
Don't expect everyone replying perfectly or has to agree or even discuss in higher level. You need to grow a thick skin while in internet world.
 
Just state yourself and that's all. What's that with forewarn this & that.




Everyone has much to prove against others and in-fact when it comes to politicians; one cannot count them saints. The point being raised is that, when a person is starting an argument in broader yet productive prospect; never name one evil or attract political fest. Once you have stated whatever you wanted, let others discuss and such censorship cannot be applied here. Stay with your argument without enforcing on others and that's all.

I see. It's about Imran Khan's political defence. Whereas I am showing reluctance in order to avoid what one military analyst on television referred to as 'beech chorahay main handia phori'. This was during the constitutional crises around Bajwa's extension. Also, read all of my posts on the thread, I have already provided enough material to support my claim.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom