MOSABJA
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2007
- Messages
- 323
- Reaction score
- 0
The mystery of 9/11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon still remains to be solved even the US experts believe that al Qaeda was not capable of launching such attacks from the caves of Afghanistan. There are some who say that the attacks were engineered and executed by the CIA itself to make it a case for attack on Afghanistan in connivance with the world in their hands.
WHATREALLYHAPPENED.COM
Alex Jones' Prison Planet.com: The Earth Is Being Turned Into A Prison Planet
911truth.org ::::: The 9/11 Truth Movement
After the US and its allies attacked Afghanistan, Pakistan played a frontline state against the Taliban regime. Thousands of al Qaeda-Taliban men fled to Pakistan where Pakistans security forces (90,000 in number) had to start an unending war against them. More than 1,200 security personnel and thousands of innocent citizens have so far died in the fight against terror a number much higher than the total casualties of US, allied and Afghan troops during the last six years period.
Every other day there is a suicide bombing in the country targeting our security forces. Only in the first 65 days of the year 2008, 22 suicide bomb blasts have occurred killing more than 250 people. Ironically enough, the US and its allies have neither condemned the attacks nor extended any material and weaponry support to Pakistan against the terrorists. Rather its agencies, think-tanks and ruthless media keep saying that Pakistan has become the most dangerous country in the world and that its nuclear assets are not safe. The US think-tanks suggested Pentagon to make a plan for attacking Pakistan with a one million joint force and eliminate its nuclear power once and for all. A 14,000 strong troops emergency Task Force of America has twice rehearsed for swiftly taking over the nuclear installations of Pakistan and rescue the nuclear arsenal to be shifted to California.
Under these circumstances, the US military commander in charge of domestic defence Air Force General Gene Renuart, chief of the US Northern Command said on March 7, 2008, that al Qaeda terrorists might be plotting more urgently to attack the US to maintain their credibility and ability to recruit followers. He told reporters that he has not seen any direct threat tied to the US presidential elections. But he said it would be rash to think that such threats are not there. We need only to look at Spain and see that they are certainly willing to try to do something that is significant that could affect an election process, Renuart said. I think it would be imprudent of us to let down our guard believing that if there is no credible threat that you know of today, there will not be something tomorrow.
Experts believe that General Gene Renaurts statement smells dangerous scheme of things on part of the US against Pakistan. They opine that the US needs another 9/11-like attack to justify launching a military campaign against Pakistan and its nuclear capability. The security analysts see the threat of such plot imminent within this year. That will coincide with the US presidential elections where the Bush administration would try to go for any extent for garnering a win for the Republican candidate in order to continue Bushs policies.
Is al Qaeda today powerful and capable enough to launch a strike like that of 9/11 is a question that needs a careful answer. The US generals, Nato and Isaf commanders in Afghanistan have time and again said that they have broken the back of al Qaeda, which is on the run and its leadership is hiding in the caves along the Pak-Afghan border. The Americans have the capability, supported by satellite surveillance and intelligence feedbacks, to keep a watch on the activities of al Qaeda men, if any, hiding anywhere in the world. But according to experts, the name of bin Laden and Aiman al-Zawahiri is being used as a hypothetical threat, which in fact does not exist anymore. In both the election wins, Bush used Osamas threatening tapes close to his elections and won the polls by using the slogan of ridding the US of al Qaeda threat. The Iraq occupation was materialised by the same threat and now it seems to be Pakistans turn.
Should the US go for attacking Pakistan with a one million force? Would it be justifiable for the US after the February 18 general elections in Pakistan have proved that only a handful of terrorists need to be eliminated, that too without violating the sovereignty but by helping the Pakistan military, which is already engaged in ridding this menace from its soil?
The February 18 general elections results have given a shut-up call to those Western and pro-Western observers who have been projecting Pakistans case as a home of terror, thus making it as a plea to attack it with the force of one million soldiers and rescue and shift its nuclear arsenal to California. They are propagating that the people of Pakistan are radicals and want al Qaeda and Taliban-like regime in the country. Saner elements look the majority of Pakistanis as moderate and there is not even one percent sympathy for the terror outfits in the country. This has now been proved in the elections.
Among many other famous journalists, Kenneth Ballen, who writes for baltimoresun.com, has observed the February 18 elections very closely. His findings are worth-reading. He says, The general election results give Islamabads next government the mandate to finally put the terrorists out of business. Violence in Pakistan, mostly driven by Taliban and pro-al Qaeda forces, has not abated since the December assassination of Benazir Bhutto. But in a potential hinge moment for what Newsweek recently called the most dangerous nation in the world, public opinion has turned suddenly and decisively against the radicals.
Last August, Terror Free Tomorrow conducted a survey across Pakistan showing that one-third to one-half of Pakistanis had a favourable opinion of al Qaeda and related radical Islamist groups. Nearly half of respondents had a positive view of bin Laden. But now, the momentous events of the past several months the mounting terror attacks by al Qaeda and the Taliban have resulted in a sea change in public opinion. In fact, this is not a sudden change in the mood but has remained all along much before August, even during the previous years.
In a new nationwide survey conducted in January, public support for al Qaeda, the Taliban, bin Laden and other radical Islamist groups has plummeted all the way down to a single digit. The bottom has fallen out for the support of the radicals. If al Qaeda or the Taliban had appeared on the ballot as a political party in the election, not even one percent Pakistanis would have voted for it. Even in areas near or in their home base, they are losing public support. Favourable opinions of al Qaeda and the Taliban in NWFP have sunk to single digits.
Indeed, these survey results mirror the stinging defeat of the Islamist parties at the hands of the voters in NWFP. The religious parties were big losers, winning just nine seats in the Provincial Assembly, compared with 67 in the 2002 elections. Kenneth Ballen says, Given the publics drastic turnaround against al Qaeda and the Taliban, particularly in their home base, there is a singular opportunity for the new government with the support of the people to have the legitimacy to mount an effective campaign against the terrorists.
One would argue that there is no home base of these radical groups at all. We Pakistanis are very much against any form of radical groups in the country and want them eliminated. There is no need to hatch such plots against Pakistan. Rather, if the US and the rest of the world are serious in completing the job, they should help us in the fight against terror and equip us with the latest weapons. They have got help from Pakistan, now it is their turn to extend their full support to Islamabad against terrorism.
WHATREALLYHAPPENED.COM
Alex Jones' Prison Planet.com: The Earth Is Being Turned Into A Prison Planet
911truth.org ::::: The 9/11 Truth Movement
After the US and its allies attacked Afghanistan, Pakistan played a frontline state against the Taliban regime. Thousands of al Qaeda-Taliban men fled to Pakistan where Pakistans security forces (90,000 in number) had to start an unending war against them. More than 1,200 security personnel and thousands of innocent citizens have so far died in the fight against terror a number much higher than the total casualties of US, allied and Afghan troops during the last six years period.
Every other day there is a suicide bombing in the country targeting our security forces. Only in the first 65 days of the year 2008, 22 suicide bomb blasts have occurred killing more than 250 people. Ironically enough, the US and its allies have neither condemned the attacks nor extended any material and weaponry support to Pakistan against the terrorists. Rather its agencies, think-tanks and ruthless media keep saying that Pakistan has become the most dangerous country in the world and that its nuclear assets are not safe. The US think-tanks suggested Pentagon to make a plan for attacking Pakistan with a one million joint force and eliminate its nuclear power once and for all. A 14,000 strong troops emergency Task Force of America has twice rehearsed for swiftly taking over the nuclear installations of Pakistan and rescue the nuclear arsenal to be shifted to California.
Under these circumstances, the US military commander in charge of domestic defence Air Force General Gene Renuart, chief of the US Northern Command said on March 7, 2008, that al Qaeda terrorists might be plotting more urgently to attack the US to maintain their credibility and ability to recruit followers. He told reporters that he has not seen any direct threat tied to the US presidential elections. But he said it would be rash to think that such threats are not there. We need only to look at Spain and see that they are certainly willing to try to do something that is significant that could affect an election process, Renuart said. I think it would be imprudent of us to let down our guard believing that if there is no credible threat that you know of today, there will not be something tomorrow.
Experts believe that General Gene Renaurts statement smells dangerous scheme of things on part of the US against Pakistan. They opine that the US needs another 9/11-like attack to justify launching a military campaign against Pakistan and its nuclear capability. The security analysts see the threat of such plot imminent within this year. That will coincide with the US presidential elections where the Bush administration would try to go for any extent for garnering a win for the Republican candidate in order to continue Bushs policies.
Is al Qaeda today powerful and capable enough to launch a strike like that of 9/11 is a question that needs a careful answer. The US generals, Nato and Isaf commanders in Afghanistan have time and again said that they have broken the back of al Qaeda, which is on the run and its leadership is hiding in the caves along the Pak-Afghan border. The Americans have the capability, supported by satellite surveillance and intelligence feedbacks, to keep a watch on the activities of al Qaeda men, if any, hiding anywhere in the world. But according to experts, the name of bin Laden and Aiman al-Zawahiri is being used as a hypothetical threat, which in fact does not exist anymore. In both the election wins, Bush used Osamas threatening tapes close to his elections and won the polls by using the slogan of ridding the US of al Qaeda threat. The Iraq occupation was materialised by the same threat and now it seems to be Pakistans turn.
Should the US go for attacking Pakistan with a one million force? Would it be justifiable for the US after the February 18 general elections in Pakistan have proved that only a handful of terrorists need to be eliminated, that too without violating the sovereignty but by helping the Pakistan military, which is already engaged in ridding this menace from its soil?
The February 18 general elections results have given a shut-up call to those Western and pro-Western observers who have been projecting Pakistans case as a home of terror, thus making it as a plea to attack it with the force of one million soldiers and rescue and shift its nuclear arsenal to California. They are propagating that the people of Pakistan are radicals and want al Qaeda and Taliban-like regime in the country. Saner elements look the majority of Pakistanis as moderate and there is not even one percent sympathy for the terror outfits in the country. This has now been proved in the elections.
Among many other famous journalists, Kenneth Ballen, who writes for baltimoresun.com, has observed the February 18 elections very closely. His findings are worth-reading. He says, The general election results give Islamabads next government the mandate to finally put the terrorists out of business. Violence in Pakistan, mostly driven by Taliban and pro-al Qaeda forces, has not abated since the December assassination of Benazir Bhutto. But in a potential hinge moment for what Newsweek recently called the most dangerous nation in the world, public opinion has turned suddenly and decisively against the radicals.
Last August, Terror Free Tomorrow conducted a survey across Pakistan showing that one-third to one-half of Pakistanis had a favourable opinion of al Qaeda and related radical Islamist groups. Nearly half of respondents had a positive view of bin Laden. But now, the momentous events of the past several months the mounting terror attacks by al Qaeda and the Taliban have resulted in a sea change in public opinion. In fact, this is not a sudden change in the mood but has remained all along much before August, even during the previous years.
In a new nationwide survey conducted in January, public support for al Qaeda, the Taliban, bin Laden and other radical Islamist groups has plummeted all the way down to a single digit. The bottom has fallen out for the support of the radicals. If al Qaeda or the Taliban had appeared on the ballot as a political party in the election, not even one percent Pakistanis would have voted for it. Even in areas near or in their home base, they are losing public support. Favourable opinions of al Qaeda and the Taliban in NWFP have sunk to single digits.
Indeed, these survey results mirror the stinging defeat of the Islamist parties at the hands of the voters in NWFP. The religious parties were big losers, winning just nine seats in the Provincial Assembly, compared with 67 in the 2002 elections. Kenneth Ballen says, Given the publics drastic turnaround against al Qaeda and the Taliban, particularly in their home base, there is a singular opportunity for the new government with the support of the people to have the legitimacy to mount an effective campaign against the terrorists.
One would argue that there is no home base of these radical groups at all. We Pakistanis are very much against any form of radical groups in the country and want them eliminated. There is no need to hatch such plots against Pakistan. Rather, if the US and the rest of the world are serious in completing the job, they should help us in the fight against terror and equip us with the latest weapons. They have got help from Pakistan, now it is their turn to extend their full support to Islamabad against terrorism.
