What's new

Conspiracy against Pakistan Army

@

He did allow the channels but for the progress of our industry. Before Pakistan's private channels people were getting attracted by the foreign media which was not good for industry.

Pakistan has a population of more than 160 million, we don't need to get foreign media to propel our media industry.
Pakistani people should be first informed of the dangers of consuming foreign propaganda and all cable operators should be stopped from broadcasting foreign especially Indian channels.
 
@

He did allow the channels but for the progress of our industry. Before Pakistan's private channels people were getting attracted by the foreign media which was not good for industry.
just think about it, how many jobs were created, by doing so?
why not these stupid politicians ever thought about it?
ohh then maybe, it could hve caused a a reduction in poverty?
its not inthe intersts of croupted political mafia?

Pakistan has a population of more than 160 million, we don't need to get foreign media to propel our media industry.
Pakistani people should be first informed of the dangers of consuming foreign propaganda and all cable operators should be stopped from broadcasting foreign especially Indian channels.
plz start a company, for that purpose, can you? try it then come to do lecture us friend?
you will be hunted down, like the billa who killed the moor of noora ,s?lolzz
 
musharaf also allowed banks to give loans, cars, small bussiness finances
so that means , each & everthing should be used against the state & its peoples, its army?
i means, dear arent you feeling sleepy?
its a really non logical?
I don't understand what point you are trying to make here.
Yes Mushy did some good things.
But on the other hand he did some very nasty things as well.
NRO and foreign media is its two big examples.
 
I don't understand what point you are trying to make here.
Yes Mushy did some good things.
But on the other hand he did some very nasty things as well.
NRO and foreign media is its two big examples.
NRO was done in the largest intersts of the nation, to give every one equal chance , yes it was a mistake , because he wasnt was croupt politician , like BB & GANJA & compny?
who were living thier croupted lives, with the finances of CIA?
if he brought media, for better image of pakistan, & job creation , did he done that wrong?
its media responsibility to up hold, the national intersts, not to sell it for thier goddammed bussines?
 
NRO was done in the largest intersts of the nation, to give every one equal chance , yes it was a mistake , because he wasnt was croupt politician , like BB & GANJA & compny?
who were living thier croupted lives, with the finances of CIA?
if he brought media, for better image of pakistan, & job creation , did he done that wrong?
its media responsibility to up hold, the national intersts, not to sell it for thier goddammed bussines?

Well NRO and foreign media aren't just small mistakes that we can just ignore as little side-steps.
NRO opened the door for all the corrupt politicians to re-enter Pakistan and loot it one more time. He knew what he was doing and still he did it. There is no way how ever you try to spin it, it was a great dis-service to Pakistan and Musharraf is ultimately responsible for it.
The same way he was an Army officer he should have known about propaganda and the many ways it can be used. Yet he still allowed Pakistan's arch enemy to dominate the Pakistani airwaves.
These are not mistakes, they are tantamount to treachery.
 
Well NRO and foreign media aren't just small mistakes that we can just ignore as little side-steps.
NRO opened the door for all the corrupt politicians to re-enter Pakistan and loot it one more time. He knew what he was doing and still he did it. There is no way how ever you try to spin it, it was a great dis-service to Pakistan and Musharraf is ultimately responsible for it.
The same way he was an Army officer he should have known about propaganda and the many ways it can be used. Yet he still allowed Pakistan's arch enemy to dominate the Pakistani airwaves.
These are not mistakes, they are tantamount to treachery.
check it around. how many times during his days indian media banned by him?
thats why pakistani peoples, started looking our own channels?
sorry, you dont have enough knowledge?
his NRO wasnt meant to be lije that, but it just happened because ofnthe preasure from ourbso called saudi brothers?
& westrn world who all did financed a fake damocrazy in pakistan through, paid media, & croupt judiciary?
whatever has done, its done?
now come to topic , which isnt is musharaf,s rule any way?
current wave of media hits against statrted by rulling govts members, its minsters, now they are paying the media , to do it properly?
 
Feature: We were soldiers
MARIA JAFRY
5353d5aed3e9a.jpg

A proud mother with her two soldier sons
Updated 2014-04-20 19:20:46
Share
83 Comment(s)
Print
“It’s not about money or glamour; there isn’t any. Nor can these ever be as strong a reason to join the army as the patriotism we feel. We do not look at the army service as a job or career. To us, it’s a complete lifestyle, filled with its unique challenges and risks,” says Colonel Agha Haseeb.

Sure enough the life of an armed forces officer is tough and the risks are high. Even though we are not in a war with another country at present, the casualties faced by the army in battling an internal enemy are increasing by the day.

This reality struck me a couple of months ago when I witnessed one of our friends receive the news of the martyrdom of his cousin, Capt Hussain, in an operation in North Waziristan. He received the news calmly and, putting up a brave face, responded: “Congratulations. He is in a better place now.” Although I had met the captain only a couple of times, I was struck with grief, but my friend’s apparently ‘cheerful’ reaction dumbfounded me.

Another friend, Maryam Zara, who was also present on the occasion, looked at my astonished face, smiled and said, “It is an honour to be a shaheed and we don’t mourn them.” She would know. Her father and both her brothers have served in the army and one of the brothers, Capt Farhan Ali, was killed in action.

“It might amaze you but none of us cried when we received the news of my brother’s passing. Even my mother did not cry; she was proud of Ali because the officers told us that it was due to him that the operation was a success. At least 12 militants were killed in that operation in Darra Adam Khel,” she relates.

You will hear many such stories in families like these; Stories of stoic acceptance and silent struggle. “We are better off not telling people (about our lost family members) because it hurts even more when people know and still don’t appreciate their sacrifice.”

Maryam Zara agrees: “It really disappoints me when people sit and curse the country which has given us so much,” she says.

Thousands of civilians and soldiers have been killed in the more than decade-long militancy that has so plagued Pakistan; behind every number is a story and a family that has been left behind.

These soldiers are selected after undergoing trying physical, academic and medical tests. This can be judged from the fact that of the 92,000 applicants only 514 made it to the Pakistan Military Academy (PMA), Kakul for the current passing out batch. Once at the PMA they go through rigorous training which includes military training, academics and physical fitness regimes that truly test the mettle of the cadets. After two years of such tough training the officers are ready to face real action.

Why would someone willingly subject themselves to such a gruelling regimen and such an uncertain fate?

“Apart from the love for your country, the honour and pride that you feel in a uniform cannot be compared to anything — be it a white collar job or being a CEO of a company,” says Saad, a young cadet about to pass out from PMA.

However, there are those who disagree with this reasoning.

“People join the army for the privileges; look at their lifestyles. They enjoy the benefits which are paid by our tax money,” says Taha who comes from a business background.

But Umme Farwa, daughter of an army officer, does not agree: “If you have a family member out there fighting, and you are unaware whether they will make it home or not; I doubt the ‘benefits’ make a difference in such a situation.”

Shayan Haider, currently a cadet at the PMA, was only 11 years old during the Kargil war in 1999 when, on returning from school, he heard his father’s car rushing in through the gate. Then he noticed the driver camouflaging the car by throwing mud all over it. There was a commotion all around the Cantt area. They could hear trucks and tanks making their way out. His father signed some blank cheques and told his mother about their various assets. His eyes were wet with tears. “Then he told me that ‘now you have to take care of your mother and the family as now you are the man of the house’. It was the most difficult time of my life.”

It was difficult to hear, but Shayan tries to understand the reasoning.

“His duty to the forces comes before his duty to us, his family,” Shayan says. Being children Shayan and his siblings could not understand the gravity of the situation till his sister asked, “When will you come back?” to which he replied, “I won’t come back” and left. The next contact he had with the family was weeks later. Then, till his return, the family had no knowledge whether he was alive or not.

“The most difficult part is to leave your family behind; it is indeed an honour for a soldier to embrace martyrdom but the pain of making your family go through that torment is unbearable,” says Colonel Umer.

“It truly shakes us when we hear crude comments in sympathy with the militants. Step into our shoes and then you will feel our pain. Think how it feels when there is no one there to pick up the bodies of your loved ones. You sleep at night because we are awake defending the borders and all we want in return is appreciation, recognition and respect,” says Lieutenant Colonel Maqsud Khan, a veteran of the ’65 and ’71 wars.

“Fighting is never easy,” continues Khan. “One reason is that the soldiers on the other side have families too who are waiting just like ours are waiting. But when you see your fellow soldier dying that’s the time you start fighting. You lose a friend, a shoulder to cry on, but his death gives you strength.”

Are you a part of Pakistan's armed forces? Share your story with Dawn.com: blog@dawn.com
 
check it around. how many times during his days indian media banned by him?
thats why pakistani peoples, started looking our own channels?
sorry, you dont have enough knowledge?

You are right this is news to me that he banned Indian media. As far I remember he was the one who gave free reign to foreign and especially Indian media over Pakistani airwaves.
his NRO wasnt meant to be lije that, but it just happened because ofnthe preasure from ourbso called saudi brothers?
& westrn world who all did financed a fake damocrazy in pakistan through, paid media, & croupt judiciary?
whatever has done, its done?

Be it pressure from saudi's or America. Musharraf was the head of Pakistani gov, he introduced NRO and he signed it into law, and thus he is responsible for it.
now come to topic , which isnt is musharaf,s rule any way?
current wave of media hits against statrted by rulling govts members, its minsters, now they are paying the media , to do it properly?

Coming to the current situation. I do hope that the bias shown by geo and other such media and negative effects of the Indian media will wake up the Pakistani politicians and will ban all such outlets.
 
You are right this is news to me that he banned Indian media. As far I remember he was the one who gave free reign to foreign and especially Indian media over Pakistani airwaves.


Be it pressure from saudi's or America. Musharraf was the head of Pakistani gov, he introduced NRO and he signed it into law, and thus he is responsible for it.


Coming to the current situation. I do hope that the bias shown by geo and other such media and negative effects of the Indian media will wake up the Pakistani politicians and will ban all such outlets.
he banned indian media , & indian air lines too?
check that to?
pakistani politicians are not with pakarmy, they are against it, so domt hope much dear freind?
more media attacks on army to follow!
 
Only in Pakistan a private news channel has the audacity to blame a national security institution and its chief for an attempted murder without any kind of proof and then get away with it without any action in return.

No wonder anti-Pakistan elements are popping out in one form or other in this country. After all this environment is the best for the enemies of Pakistan.
Its also fault of ISI and Army too they have tolerated these dumbos for long they should have taken out the owners long ago
 
We don't play gulli danda. I will be happy to play lawn tenniin with you or snooker :coffee:
I live at a walking distance from middlesex cricket county ground and think of gullidanda, where as you live In pakistan and think of tennis and snnoker....what a harmless difference of thinking........but why?.BTW, how very old is "very old"?, as long as you are not chronocally ill, not huffing or puffing when going upstairs/downstairs, can femember things, solve mathemetical questions and producing early morning testestrones, you are not "very old", even at 73+.
 
Pakistan has a population of more than 160 million, we don't need to get foreign media to propel our media industry.
Pakistani people should be first informed of the dangers of consuming foreign propaganda and all cable operators should be stopped from broadcasting foreign especially Indian channels.

This is the point actually,when a country has only one channel which is telecasting few programs then it's very much easy to get attracted by others.. At least this move should be appreciated .

just think about it, how many jobs were created, by doing so?
why not these stupid politicians ever thought about it?
ohh then maybe, it could hve caused a a reduction in poverty?
its not inthe intersts of croupted political mafia?

There main motive was to control the news. To keep people away from reality. . Government channel showed what it was directed to show whereas the situation is different today... But it should be control..
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom