What's new

Commander Receiving F-35As: ‘It’s Going to Be an Absolute Monster’

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
The celebration of the Air Force variant of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter reaching initial operational capability continued Friday with a ceremony replete with dignitaries at Hill Air Force Base in Utah, where 15 F-35s were declared combat-ready this week.

The crowd in attendance included Utah Gov. Gary Herbert; Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah; Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James; Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Goldfein; the head of Air Combat Command, Gen. Herbert “Hawk” Carlisle; and other top Air Force brass.

The commander of Hill’s 388th Fighter Wing, Brad Lyons, touted the accomplishments of the F-35A variant, saying the aircraft had performed even better than hoped in recent testing.

The now-operational F-35As will be assigned to Hill’s 34th Fighter Squadron, out of the 388th Fighter Wing, and maintained with support from the 419th Fighter Wing.

Lyons noted that the F-35A had completed 88 out of 88 successful sorties at Mountain Home Air Force Base, Idaho, in June and dropped 15 out of 16 bombs on target. In the F-35 spinup program, he said, the aircraft had achieved 39 direct hits out of 40 munitions deployed.

“Of the F-35, I can say unequivocally we are only beginning to scratch the surface of what this airplane will be able to do in the future,” he said. “Make no mistake: It is extremely capable today. But it’s going to be an absolute monster in the years to come. I wouldn’t want to face it on the battlefield. As a commander of airmen, I am comfortable and confident sending my fighters downrange to fly, fight and win in this aircraft.”

Lyons praised the hard work done by those involved with preparing the aircraft for IOC.

“The last time I stood here, I asked you to tighten your chinstraps and get to work,” he said. “Today, I want to say loud and clear to our airmen, for both our friends and adversaries to hear: You delivered.”

Carlisle said Monday he expects to see the F-35A deployed to the European and Pacific theaters within the next 18 months.

http://www.dodbuzz.com/2016/08/05/c...to-be-an-absolute-monster/?ESRC=todayinmil.sm
 
Wondering which conflict would be the first in which F-35s would officially come across actual Air to Air Combat against any adversary.
 
Wondering which conflict would be the first in which F-35s would officially come across actual Air to Air Combat against any adversary.

Good question. South China Sea dispute maybe?
 
Good question. South China Sea dispute maybe?

I dont think Uncle Sam is such a fool to start direct confrontation with China. Nor are Japan and South Korea. Thats why I said am wondering which front it would be.
 
I dont think Uncle Sam is such a fool to start direct confrontation with China. Nor are Japan and South Korea. Thats why I said am wondering which front it would be.
What if China is such a fool to start a direct confrontation with Uncle Sam ? :enjoy:
 
I dont think Uncle Sam is such a fool to start direct confrontation with China. Nor are Japan and South Korea. Thats why I said am wondering which front it would be.

Accidents still happen.
 
Yup accidents do happen or sometime are made to happen. U wud surely recall this accident:

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/02/w...collides-with-chinese-jet.html?pagewanted=all

and how amicably the issue was resolved as

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/apr/11/china.usa

And this was how the US aircraft reached back Home

http://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=80826&page=1
The collision came from poor airmanship and recklessness on the part of the Chinese pilot. Am willing to guess that you have never been at the controls of an aircraft ?

At 3,000 feet MSL and 100 KAIS we met up with 09Q for some formation flying and a wake turbulence demonstration. As we pull up behind 09Q at 1:40 and 1:50 we enter a vortex and are thrown to the side. The two planes are trying to maintain steady formation flight in relation to one another, but the wake is too strong. This demonstration shows the effect of wake turbulence from a small aircraft as well as the hazard that wake turbulence presents when landing behind large aircraft.
Most non-flyers do not understand how dangerous it is in formation flying. For the video above, we are looking at two small aircrafts and one of them was in brief danger just from entering a wake turbulence.

In the Hainan Incident, the larger American aircraft was flying in what is called a 'steady state' flight. Nevertheless, there is no telling what could happened to a smaller aircraft if it is caught in the turbulent airflow produced by the larger aircraft. In this case, China lost a pilot. An irreplaceable asset. Nothing to boast about.
 
The collision came from poor airmanship and recklessness on the part of the Chinese pilot. Am willing to guess that you have never been at the controls of an aircraft ?

As a matter of fact I have had the opportunity to grab stick of quite few different types of aircraft. And actually we were referring to "accidents" here. And this very accident could have led to serious repercussions but if it was amicably solved. But if was Chinese Pilot's fault like U said then why did US apologize for the incident?
 
As a matter of fact I have had the opportunity to grab stick of quite few different types of aircraft. And actually we were referring to "accidents" here. And this very accident could have led to serious repercussions but if it was amicably solved. But if was Chinese Pilot's fault like U said then why did US apologize for the incident?
We did not 'apologized' in the sense that we admitted we caused the collision. In the English language, when you say you are 'sorry' or 'apologize', it could mean you are expressing sorrow and sympathy, not necessarily accepting blame.

verb
  1. 1.
    assign responsibility for a fault or wrong.
The American aircraft was flying in international airspace. That in itself put US in the right. Further, the aircraft was a lumbering four engine prop jobber, not an agile small fighter.

The Chinese pilot died. Not because we rammed him. But because he literally flew into us. Why should we accept blame for being in international airspace and exercising strict airmanship ?
 
The collision came from poor airmanship and recklessness on the part of the Chinese pilot. Am willing to guess that you have never been at the controls of an aircraft ?


Most non-flyers do not understand how dangerous it is in formation flying. For the video above, we are looking at two small aircrafts and one of them was in brief danger just from entering a wake turbulence.

In the Hainan Incident, the larger American aircraft was flying in what is called a 'steady state' flight. Nevertheless, there is no telling what could happened to a smaller aircraft if it is caught in the turbulent airflow produced by the larger aircraft. In this case, China lost a pilot. An irreplaceable asset. Nothing to boast about.

Wonderful American propaganda. So much of US competency :enjoy:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a20917/us-crews-fail-to-place-in-nato-tank-competition/

In fact, most american armed forces are poor trained and reckless.

They have no discipline. Bully civilian and raped woman.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom