Colliding black holes could warp space-time itself

[Malik Alashter]

And are you sure there are such things as 'black holes'? It's just a theory to suit mathematical equations. I prefer the 'electric universe' theory....

It must not be forgotten that all the arguments for the black hole are theoretical, based solely upon the erroneous Hilbert solution and the meaningless Kruskal-Szekeres extension on it. One is therefore led to wonder what it is that astronomers actually “see” when they claim that they have found yet another black hole here or there.

Besides the purely mathematical errors that mitigate the black hole, there are also considerable physical arguments against it, in addition to the fact that no event horizon has ever been detected.

Stephen Crothers Destroys the Quackademic "Black Hole"

It's not up to this guy black holes reality they already prove their exist.

 

[OrionHunter]

It's not up to this guy black holes reality they already prove their exist.

Nope! They've not been proven yet, because if they were, then black holes would not be dubbed as a 'THEORY'! QED!

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

I am just an ape - mammal and I only care of Finding food daily , shelter and expanding my family by childbirth

APE , not interested in cosmic collision in fabric of time and space

 

[Malik Alashter]

Nope! They've not been proven yet, because if they were, then black holes would not be dubbed as a 'THEORY'! QED!

Sir your info outdated the black holes not theory any more they found one in the center of our galaxy its mass almost ten million solar mass.

Black holes what keep the galaxy together otherwise every thing will be blown away well wouldnt come together from the first place.

 

[OrionHunter]

Sir your info outdated the black holes not theory any more they found one in the center of our galaxy its mass almost ten million solar mass.

Black holes what keep the galaxy together otherwise every thing will be blown away well wouldnt come together from the first place.

Ok, check this out...

In his paper, Information Preservation and Weather Forecasting for Black Holes, Stephen Hawking writes: "The absence of event horizons means that there are no black holes.

 

[Malik Alashter]

Ok, check this out...

In his paper, Information Preservation and Weather Forecasting for Black Holes, Stephen Hawking writes: "The absence of event horizons means that there are no black holes.

My freind with all due respect read this please>
Black holes are real because astraunomer discover them almost every year.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...yH8vJk3XH5pdv55qH-3tOQg&bvm=bv.83339334,d.eXY

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

I tried to think and sqeeze the sun into tiny spot and and it turned into a bannana

And I will be going to fridge and eating a fresh bananna now

 

[Providence]

Nothing called gravitational waves has been detected yet and the theories are well.. theories not even conjectures.

Wake me up when he hadron collider detects the graviton.

 

[Imtiaz_Sarwar]

Nothing called gravitational waves has been detected yet and the theories are well.. theories not even conjectures.

Wake me up when he hadron collider detects the graviton.

Your country has built two LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational wave Observatory) to detect gravitational waves. There have been a few false alarms but nothing has been detected. Now your country is planning to build one in space. When a gravitational wave is finally detected, it will surely wake you up as it will be in every scientific magazine, news channel and website.

 

[jamahir]

And are you sure there are such things as 'black holes'? It's just a theory to suit mathematical equations. I prefer the 'electric universe' theory....

It must not be forgotten that all the arguments for the black hole are theoretical, based solely upon the erroneous Hilbert solution and the meaningless Kruskal-Szekeres extension on it. One is therefore led to wonder what it is that astronomers actually “see” when they claim that they have found yet another black hole here or there.

Besides the purely mathematical errors that mitigate the black hole, there are also considerable physical arguments against it, in addition to the fact that no event horizon has ever been detected.

Stephen Crothers Destroys the Quackademic "Black Hole"

i certainly don't believe in "the space-time continuum" and "dark matter" and all such fancy term promoted by those who are more mathematicans than astronomers.

i will now download this video, and see if "black holes" are also more a mathematical construct than something real... by the way, stephen crothers has a file hairstyle.

@levina @thesolar65 @XenoEnsi-14 @Audio please watch this vid... i will too.

by the way, i am not receiving alerts sometimes... i didn't for this op.

 

[Levina]

i certainly don't believe in "the space-time continuum" and "dark matter" and all such fancy term promoted by those who are more mathematicans than astronomers.

i will now download this video, and see if "black holes" are also more a mathematical construct than something real... by the way, stephen crothers has a file hairstyle.

@levina @thesolar65 @XenoEnsi-14 @Audio please watch this vid... i will too.

by the way, i am not receiving alerts sometimes... i didn't for this op.

I have always doubted the existence of black holes, one because black holes with a lot of infinities. The "infinitely" weak force of gravity is balanced by postulating an almost "infinitely" dense object – the black hole.
I really dont believe black holes exist because such an infinitely dense object can not exist. Its said every system moves from chaos to order and then order to chaos. (@Dem!god was it thermodynamics?? ) So any system would not remain intact for so long to create a black hole which is infinitely dense. Or so my logic tells me.

 

[Dem!god]

I have always doubted the existence of black holes, one because black holes with a lot of infinities. The "infinitely" weak force of gravity is balanced by postulating an almost "infinitely" dense object – the black hole.
I really dont believe black holes exist because such an infinitely dense object can not exist. Its said every system moves from chaos to order and then order to chaos. (@Dem!god was it thermodynamics?? ) So any system would not remain intact for so long to create a black hole which is infinitely dense. Or so my logic tells me.

uuhhh...
u are very much mistaken... black holes exists very much... and you would be shocked to know, every galactic center is a black hole...

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

I tried to think about this again , and this time the imagination turned into russ malai

 

[Levina]

uuhhh...
u are very much mistaken... black holes exists very much... and you would be shocked to know, every galactic center is a black hole...

I know that theory. Lol
I called you here to know the name of the theory which says every system moves from chaos to order and back to chaos with time. Whats it called?

 

[jamahir]

I tried to think about this again , and this time the imagination turned into russ malai

what is that... cream for russian cats??

The "infinitely" weak force of gravity is balanced by postulating an almost "infinitely" dense object – the black hole.

that reminds me of the part in the stephen crothers vid where he was questioning the "event horizon".

So any system would not remain intact for so long to create a black hole which is infinitely dense. Or so my logic tells me.

i agree... i believe the universe is simpler than the fantasies of mathematicians disguised as astronomers and physicists.

you know, mathematicians are more likely to be religious than true astronomers and physicists.

there should be a renaissance in astronomy where all unnecessary mathematics must be rejected, all latin names for space objects must be replaced, and of course a new classification system of worlds/planets must be set up.