What's new

Colliding black holes could warp space-time itself

thesolar65

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
4,922
Reaction score
-12
Country
India
Location
India
If the two black holes meet, they could release as much energy as 100 million supernova explosions as they shatter their galaxy, a new study finds.

A team of prominent researchers has discovered what appears to be the start of two massive black holes at the centers of their own galaxies beginning to collide.

Such an event should come as no surprise, considering that there are up to 200 billion galaxies in the universe (according to Space.com), so two of them are bound to bump into each other from time to time. In fact, astronomers have already observed the merging of galaxies (as seen in the image above), but they've never before witnessed the end-stage process of galaxy commingling, which results when the two central black holes smash into each other, releasing some pretty violent cosmic fireworks that could warp space-time itself.

The researchers, including scientists from Caltech and NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab, have theorized that an unusual light signal they're seeing from quasar PG 1302-102 -- essentially a black hole emitting light from the superheated particles swirling around its gravitational drain -- is being caused by the cosmic dance between two black holes in the system, each located less than the length of our solar system apart. The theory was published this week in the journal Nature.

While other cosmic phenomena could explain the light signature, the scientists became confident that their theory is the most likely after analyzing the quasar's light spectrum.

"When you look at the emission lines in a spectrum from an object, what you're really seeing is information about speed -- whether something is moving toward you or away from you and how fast. It's the Doppler effect," Eilat Glikman, study co-author and assistant professor of physics at Middlebury College in Vermont said in a statement.

"With quasars, you typically have one emission line, and that line is a symmetric curve. But with this quasar, it was necessary to add a second emission line with a slightly different speed than the first one in order to fit the data. That suggests something else, such as a second black hole, is perturbing this system."

If the theory is correct, study co-author S. George Djorgovski of the California Institute of Technology told The New York Times that when the two black holes collide, they could release the energy equivalent to 100 million supernova explosions, which would rip apart the galaxy in which they're floating. The collision would also release gravitational waves, ripples in the fabric of space-time predicted by Einstein's theory of general relativity, Djorgovski told the Times.

Unfortunately, astronomers hoping to witness such an event are out of luck, as the predicted union won't take place for about another million years -- a long time in human standards, but not cosmic ones. Of course, the universe itself already knows whether the theory is correct because the light we're seeing from this system, located in the Virgo constellation, comes from 3.5 billion light years away -- meaning everything we're witnessing already took place billions of years ago. But until we come up with our own way to warp the space-time continuum, I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

@Skull and Bones @Developereo @levina @C130 @Akheilos @CONNAN @anant_s @Gufi @Echo_419 @gslv @gslv mk3 @jbgt90 @Star Wars @Nihonjin1051 @jamahir @MarkusS @OrionHunter @AUSTERLITZ

BTW our galaxy (Sun and some of its children will be there, but all dead) will witness a thing like this in say next 10-12 billion years!!
 
Well...this will generate enormous gravitational waves for sure but will in no way shatter the two galaxies. They will merge and form a irregular galaxy. Its something normal in the universe. But it will trigger a star burst for sure.
 
And are you sure there are such things as 'black holes'? It's just a theory to suit mathematical equations. I prefer the 'electric universe' theory....

It must not be forgotten that all the arguments for the black hole are theoretical, based solely upon the erroneous Hilbert solution and the meaningless Kruskal-Szekeres extension on it. One is therefore led to wonder what it is that astronomers actually “see” when they claim that they have found yet another black hole here or there.

Besides the purely mathematical errors that mitigate the black hole, there are also considerable physical arguments against it, in addition to the fact that no event horizon has ever been detected.

Stephen Crothers Destroys the Quackademic "Black Hole"

 
Last edited:
And are you sure there are such things as 'black holes'? It's just a theory to suit mathematical equations. I prefer the 'electric universe' theory....

Stephen Crothers Destroys the Quackademic "Black Hole"



what he says is bullshit. Of course black holes exist. What do you think sits in the center of our galaxy? Miley Cyrus?
 
Here is "One" better (or worse)
What Happens When Three Black Holes Collide?

bhcoll-purpur-innen.jpg

The consequences of two black holes colliding may be huge, the energy produced by such a collision could even be detected by observatories here on Earth. Ripples in space-time will wash over the Universe as gravitational waves and are predicted to be detected as they pass through the Solar System. Taking this idea one step further, what would happen if three black holes collide? Sound like science fiction? Well it’s not, and there is observational evidence that three black holes can cluster together, possibly colliding after some highly complex orbits that can only be calculated by the most powerful computers available to researchers…

triplequasars.jpg

Back in January 2007, a quasar triplet was observed over 10 billion light years away. Quasars are generated by the supermassive black holes eating away at the core of active galaxies. Using the powerful W. M. Keck Observatory, researchers from Caltech were able to peer back in time (10 billion years) to see a period in the Universe’s life when active galaxies and black hole mergers would have been fairly common events (when compared to the calmer Universe of today). They observed three tightly packed quasars, an unprecedented discovery.
Now, scientists Manuela Campanelli, Carlos Lousto and Yosef Zlochower, all working at Rochester Institute of Technology’s Center for Computational Relativity and Gravitation, have simulated the highly complex mechanisms behind three interacting and merging supermassive black holes, much like the situation observed by Keck in 2007. The same group have worked on calculating the collision of two black holes before and have written a code that is powerful enough to simulate the collision of up to 22 black holes. However, 22 black holes probably wouldn’t collide naturally, this simply demonstrates the stability of the code, “Twenty-two is not going to happen in reality, but three or four can happen,” says Yosef Zlochower, an assistant professor. “We realized that the code itself really didn’t care how many black holes there were. As long as we could specify where they were located – and had enough computer power – we could track them.

These simulations are of paramount importance to the gravitational wave detectors such as the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO). So far there has been no firm evidence to come from these detectors, but more time is needed, the LIGO detector requires several years of “exposure time” to collect enough data and remove observational “noise”. But what do gravitational wave astronomers look for? This is the very reason many different cosmic scenarios are being simulated so the characteristics of events like two or three black holes mergers can be identified from their gravitational wave signature.
What Happens When Three Black Holes Collide?
 
Astronomy is one of my favorite subjects. I like astronomy. But this is a defence forum. I am surprised to see Astronomy discussed here. When Astronomers discuss astronomy, it is fine. When people with interest in defence start discussing astronomy, where will it end ? I will let my imagination run wild and say "WEAPONS OF PLANET DISTRUCTION."
 
what he says is bullshit. Of course black holes exist. What do you think sits in the center of our galaxy? Miley Cyrus?
C'mon dude, neither you nor I or anyone else on mother Earth has ever seen a black hole. These are all deductions, conjectures and interpretations to try and conform to mathematical equations.

Why, hell, you must even believe in the so called 'big bang' theory too!

Remember, these are all THEORIES! Period! In other words, it's not yet proven. So have an open analytical mind, instead of blindly following whatever is dished out by mainstream scientists and media.

A hundred and twenty years back, scientists said it was impossible to fly in heavier than air machines! Later some scientists said it was impossible to break the sound barrier. Then some scientists warned that the CERN Hadron Collider experiment would create a black hole that would gobble up the Earth!! Jeeez! Scientists!

And then comes 'dark energy' and 'dark matter'. Esoteric sounding terms but no one knows WTF they are. And on and on they go!
 
It won't be a surprise if someone, someday in the future comes up with a weapon taken from these findings!? and experiments!? destructive weapons are the most eminent self rewarding motivator for a human being, even at the highest levels ... "The scientists".
We are already at hyper speed experiments...

OT:
Black-holes collisions might generate or have some domino effects on nearby galaxies and their black-holes, so more than two won't be that necessary for a much wider effect, it can just become exponential...

Colliding black holes could warp space-time itself
That is a good one!!!
 
C'mon dude, neither you nor I or anyone else on mother Earth has ever seen a black hole.

We have seen a supermassive black hole eating a star, that came too close.

644691main_pia15620-946.jpg


These images, taken with NASA's Galaxy Evolution Explorer and the Pan-STARRS1 telescope in Hawaii, show a brightening inside a galaxy caused by a flare from its nucleus. The arrow in each image points to the galaxy. The flare is a signature of the galaxy's central black hole shredding a star that wandered too close.

The top left image, taken by the Galaxy Evolution Explorer in 2009, shows the galaxy's location before the flare. The galaxy is not visible in this ultraviolet-light exposure. In the top right image, taken by the Galaxy Evolution Explorer on June 23, 2010, the galaxy has become 350 times brighter in ultraviolet light.

The bottom left image, taken by Pan-STARRS1, shows the galaxy (the bright dot in the center) in 2009 before the flare's appearance. The bottom right image, taken by Pan-STARRS1 from June to August 2010, shows the flare from the galaxy nucleus. Note how the light from the flare is much bluer, or hotter, than the host galaxy light.


Source: NASA/JPL
 
Last edited:
If the two black holes meet, they could release as much energy as 100 million supernova explosions as they shatter their galaxy, a new study finds.

A team of prominent researchers has discovered what appears to be the start of two massive black holes at the centers of their own galaxies beginning to collide.

Such an event should come as no surprise, considering that there are up to 200 billion galaxies in the universe (according to Space.com), so two of them are bound to bump into each other from time to time. In fact, astronomers have already observed the merging of galaxies (as seen in the image above), but they've never before witnessed the end-stage process of galaxy commingling, which results when the two central black holes smash into each other, releasing some pretty violent cosmic fireworks that could warp space-time itself.

The researchers, including scientists from Caltech and NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab, have theorized that an unusual light signal they're seeing from quasar PG 1302-102 -- essentially a black hole emitting light from the superheated particles swirling around its gravitational drain -- is being caused by the cosmic dance between two black holes in the system, each located less than the length of our solar system apart. The theory was published this week in the journal Nature.

While other cosmic phenomena could explain the light signature, the scientists became confident that their theory is the most likely after analyzing the quasar's light spectrum.

"When you look at the emission lines in a spectrum from an object, what you're really seeing is information about speed -- whether something is moving toward you or away from you and how fast. It's the Doppler effect," Eilat Glikman, study co-author and assistant professor of physics at Middlebury College in Vermont said in a statement.

"With quasars, you typically have one emission line, and that line is a symmetric curve. But with this quasar, it was necessary to add a second emission line with a slightly different speed than the first one in order to fit the data. That suggests something else, such as a second black hole, is perturbing this system."

If the theory is correct, study co-author S. George Djorgovski of the California Institute of Technology told The New York Times that when the two black holes collide, they could release the energy equivalent to 100 million supernova explosions, which would rip apart the galaxy in which they're floating. The collision would also release gravitational waves, ripples in the fabric of space-time predicted by Einstein's theory of general relativity, Djorgovski told the Times.

Unfortunately, astronomers hoping to witness such an event are out of luck, as the predicted union won't take place for about another million years -- a long time in human standards, but not cosmic ones. Of course, the universe itself already knows whether the theory is correct because the light we're seeing from this system, located in the Virgo constellation, comes from 3.5 billion light years away -- meaning everything we're witnessing already took place billions of years ago. But until we come up with our own way to warp the space-time continuum, I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

@Skull and Bones @Developereo @levina @C130 @Akheilos @CONNAN @anant_s @Gufi @Echo_419 @gslv @gslv mk3 @jbgt90 @Star Wars @Nihonjin1051 @jamahir @MarkusS @OrionHunter @AUSTERLITZ

BTW our galaxy (Sun and some of its children will be there, but all dead) will witness a thing like this in say next 10-12 billion years!!

**** this I will be dead by then
 
**** this I will be dead by then

You?? Entire solar system would be dead by then!!

Astronomy is one of my favorite subjects. I like astronomy. But this is a defence forum. I am surprised to see Astronomy discussed here. When Astronomers discuss astronomy, it is fine. When people with interest in defence start discussing astronomy, where will it end ? I will let my imagination run wild and say "WEAPONS OF PLANET DISTRUCTION."

OK if you are interested, I will try to tag you with anything about Astronomy, but in discussions regarding Ind-Pak the business will be as usual!!...:):tup:
 
C'mon dude, neither you nor I or anyone else on mother Earth has ever seen a black hole. These are all deductions, conjectures and interpretations to try and conform to mathematical equations.

Why, hell, you must even believe in the so called 'big bang' theory too!

Remember, these are all THEORIES! Period! In other words, it's not yet proven. So have an open analytical mind, instead of blindly following whatever is dished out by mainstream scientists and media.

A hundred and twenty years back, scientists said it was impossible to fly in heavier than air machines! Later some scientists said it was impossible to break the sound barrier. Then some scientists warned that the CERN Hadron Collider experiment would create a black hole that would gobble up the Earth!! Jeeez! Scientists!

And then comes 'dark energy' and 'dark matter'. Esoteric sounding terms but no one knows WTF they are. And on and on they go!


We can see the one in the center of our galaxy. Sagittarius A. It just swallowed the mass of earth and ripped a star apart that passed to close. We know the stellar black hole Cygnus. Saying black holes don´t exist is like saying the planet Jupiter doesn´t exist.
 
Observations of binary SMBHs (Supermassive black holes) in several galaxies support that hypothesis. However, mergers are slow compared to the human life span, so the black holes we see locked in mutual orbit are a long way from collision. They will do so eventually, however, because energy is carried away from them as they churn space-time up in waves known as gravitational radiation. With every bit of energy radiated, the black holes grow closer until they finally merge. While astronomers have not observed orbital shrinkage and have not detected gravitational waves directly, they have seen this process occur in binary Pulsars.However, binary SMBHs are rare in the astronomical data, partly because it's hard to distinguish a single black hole from a pair at large distances. So researchers resort to theory and computer simulations to predict how many black hole binaries there must be. Those models are primarily concerned with galaxy formation and mergers, but presumably many collisions will result in SMBH pairs. Estimates indicate that binaries should be common enough to create a gravitational wave background that fills the Universe with faint gravitational radiation.
 
We can see the one in the center of our galaxy. Sagittarius A. It just swallowed the mass of earth and ripped a star apart that passed to close. We know the stellar black hole Cygnus. Saying black holes don´t exist is like saying the planet Jupiter doesn´t exist.
No! You can't see it. No one has! These are all conjectures. How can you see something when as they say even light can't escape it? Radio waves? So that boils down to conjecture. Check out my video above.
 
Back
Top Bottom