What's new

Cold fusion reactor verified by third-party researchers, seems to have 1 million times the energy de

Bilal.

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
7,219
Reaction score
9
Cold fusion reactor verified by third-party researchers, seems to have 1 million times the energy density of gasoline | ExtremeTech

Andrea Rossi’s E-Cat — the device that purports to use cold fusion to generate massive amounts of cheap, green energy – has been verified by third-party researchers, according to a new 54-page report. The researchers observed a small E-Cat over 32 days, where it produced net energy of 1.5 megawatt-hours, or “far more than can be obtained from any known chemical sources in the small reactor volume.” The researchers were also allowed to analyze the fuel before and after the 32-day run, noting that the isotopes in the spent fuel could only have been obtained by “nuclear reactions” — a conclusion that boggles the researchers: “… It is of course very hard to comprehend how these fusion processes can take place in the fuel compound at low energies.”

This new report [PDF] on the E-Cat was carried out by six (reputable) researchers from Italy and Sweden. While the new E-Cat looks very different from previous iterations, the researchers say that it uses the same “hydrogen-loaded nickel” and additives (most notably lithium) as a fuel. The device’s inventor, Andrea Rossi, claims that the E-Cat uses cold fusion — low-energy nuclear reactions, LENR — to fuse nickel and hydrogen atoms into copper, releasing oodles of energy. The researchers, analyzing the fuel before and after the 32-day burn, note that there is an isotope shift from a “natural” mix of Nickel-58/Nickel-60 to almost entirely Nickel-62 — a reaction that, the researchers say, cannot occur without nuclear reactions (i.e. fusion). The researchers say there is just 1 gram of fuel inside the E-Cat. For more info about the science/chemistry behind LENR, read our previous story about Rossi’s E-Cat.

The researchers are very careful about not actually saying that cold fusion/LENR is the source of the E-Cat’s energy, instead merely saying that an “unknown reaction” is at work. In serious scientific circles, LENR is still a bit of a joke/taboo topic. The paper is actually somewhat comical in this regard: The researchers really try to work out how the E-Cat produces so much darn energy — and they conclude that fusion is the only answer — but then they reel it all back in by adding: “The reaction speculation above should only be considered as an example of reasoning and not a serious conjecture.”

Anyway, now that we’ve got the necessary cynicism/scrutiny out of the way, let’s get down to what everyone’s really interested in: The utterly insane amounts of energy produced by the E-Cat. In the table below you can see some figures from the 32-day test. The most important figures are on the right hand side: a COP (coefficient of performance) of up to 3.74, and net power production of 2,373 watts. Remember that this is a small device that produced these kinds of figures for 32 days straight. Total energy obtained over 32 days was 1.5 MWh.



To put this into perspective, the E-Cat tested by the researchers has an energy density of 1.6×109 Wh/kg and power density of 2.1×106 W/kg. This is orders (plural) of magnitude higher than anything else ever tested — somewhere in the region of 100 times more power than the best supercapacitors, and maybe a million times more energy than gasoline. In the words of the researchers, “These values place the E-Cat beyond any other known conventional source of energy.”

Read: NASA’s cold fusion tech could put a nuclear reactor in every home, car, and plane


This is what a commercialized E-Cat will apparently look like, when Rossi finally gets around to changing the world.
Obviously, if these third-party findings are to be believed — if the E-Cat really is performing cold fusion — then this is rather exciting. We are talking about an extremely cheap, green, and dense power source that could quite literally change the world.

Before the world can be changed, however, there will now be a very extensive period of scrutiny from the scientific community at large. The previous third-party analysis of the E-Cat device, published in March 2013, was attacked and debunked very rapidly. It seems this new report has been intentionally designed so that there are fewer plot holes and logical leaps. The research paper has reportedly been submitted to the Arxiv pre-print server, with the hope of eventually being published in the Journal of Nuclear Physics.

The next few weeks could be very interesting indeed. According to one report at Sifferkoll, a big bank downloaded the new E-Cat report just minutes after it was made available online — and “oil futures have stayed volatile since.” And of course this morning Glasgow University announced that it would be selling its fossil fuel investments. Hmm…
 
. .
This e-cat company is nothing more than fraud. If they really have this tech, what's stopping them from selling?
 
.
I've talked to some Astrophysicists Ph.Ds and one told me that she honestly thinks Cold Fusion isn't even physically or atomically possible. It is considered pseudo-science.
 
.
Let us wait for the scientific review and than comment.
Work on cold fusion was going on for 30 or so years now, who knows when a breakthrough will come.

This is the report from E-cat's sit in pdf:
http://ecat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ECAT-test-report-2014.pdf





LENR Technology

LENR Technology, which is the basis for the reactions occurring in the ECAT core, have a huge advantage over existing energy sources because it utilizes the energy bound in the atomic nucleus. Earlier this energy has only been utilized in nuclear reactors based on fission.

LENR technology has several advantages over existing nuclear reactors in that there are NO radioactive materials involved, and that there is NO radioactivity and NO radioactive waste from the process. At the same time it has similar energy densities to other nuclear energy sources, which has far superior energy densities compared to any chemical energy sources such as oil, coal and gas.

The superiority of LENR Technology lies in the energy density of the underlying reaction. The chemical reaction for burning coal in air, for instance, is

C + O2 → CO2 + 4.1eV,

where the 4.1eV(=6.6*10-19J) is released as heat. This is to be compared with one of the LENR processes in the ECAT core

Ni62 + H → Cu63 + 6.12 MeV,

where the 6.12 MeV(=9.8*10-13J) is also released as heat. Hence, the heat released by the LENR process is about 1.5 million times higher, per atomic reaction, than what we get from a chemical reaction like burning coal.

ECAT Fuel Facts – Comparison with Oil

  • Costs 1/1000 of Oil (in fact, ECAT fuel cost is less than transportation cost of oil)
  • Energy Density > 100 000 x oil, Power Density > 100 kW/l
  • Reserves to last 10 billion years (oil 150 years)
  • No emissions, no pollution, no noise
  • 1 liter Ni-H 2 000 000 liter oil
a0eef5de34596ebdb562186228c91c73.jpg

Figure 1. 1 barrel of ECAT fuel has the oil equivalence of a full Supertanker



In order to have commercial success with a product based on LENR one has to demonstrate:

  • High enough COP (Coefficient of Performance)
  • High enough working temperature.
The COP is a measure of the ratio between energy output and input. Leonardo Corp guarantees a COP of 6 for the ECAT, meaning that it takes a required 1 kW of input power to produce 6 kW of heat.

To understand the basis for building product applications upon a heat source, such as the ECAT core, one needs to know the physical and mechanical limits in transforming heat into work (work can be electricity or the movement of a car for instance). The physical limit is defined by the Carnot efficiency,

nc = (1-Tc/Th),

where Tc is the temperature of cold heat reservoir (the temperature of the coolant), and Th is the temperature of the hot heat reservoir (the heating temperature of the heat source). Both temperatures needs to be given in the natural temperature unit Kelvin. As an example, electricity obtained from a heat source at 327C and a coolant at 27C has a Carnot efficiency equal to

nc = (1-(27+273)/(327+273)) = (1-300/600) = 50%,

which is the physically maximum of electricity you can get from such a thermodynamic process (273 is the difference between degrees Kelvin and Centigrade).

As can be seen from the formula, the Carnot efficiency increases when the temperature of the heat source increases and/or the temperature of the coolant decreases.

In addition to physical limitation, all mechanical processes have energy losses, and as a rule of thumb usually only 60%-70% of the Carnot efficiency is achievable in practice. Assuming mechanical efficiency of 65% gives a formula for achievable net electricity efficiency taking into account the input power used to drive the process, which is 1/COP:

ne=0.65*(1-Tc/Th)-1/COP.

Should the net electricity efficiency (in the above formula) be negative the interpretation is that not enough electricity is produced from the heat source to support its own need of input power.

Nevertheless heat is also a product, so even if a heat source can not break even on electricity, it might still be viable as a heat source product. Below, the net efficiency formula is put into a heat source utility map divided into viable products such as Heat, CHP and Power.

67befc997d684bbcc4d494e5bb08f82a.jpg

Figure 2. Heat Source Utility Map



The ECAT HT core operates at temperatures as high as 1000C. Hence, if a COP above 5 can be achieved, most energy problems in the world can be solved.

In addition to the temperature and the COP, the power density is a utilizing factor, especially for transportation applications, where size and weight are limiting factors.

To summarize – LENR technology is far superior in comparison to all existing energy sources:

  • SUPERIOR ENERGY DENSITY: LENR has an energy density that is a factor 100,000-10,000,000 times greater than today’s combustion processes (Oil, Coal, Natural Gas) and reportedly higher than today’s commercial fission.
  • GREEN & SAFE: LENR is 100% green and carbon free. LENR is a nuclear reaction, however it does not require uranium/plutonium, has no nuclear byproducts, and has no harmful effects or safety issues like fission energy.
  • LIMITLESS: The current fuel for LENR, nickel + hydrogen, is nearly limitless, the most abundant metal and the most abundant gas on earth. No combustion process takes place, instead the hydrogen is merged with nickel, which is transmuted to form copper + energy. LENR also appears possible using metals other than Nickel such as Palladium for instance.
  • CHEAP, SMALL & SCALABLE: The forthcoming LENR devices are all very cost efficient. They are small, easy to manufacture/operate, highly efficient and reliable, with no moving parts and requiring only the replacement of a nickel-hydrogen cartridge every 6 months or so.
LENR Technology
 
.
Cold fusion is the power generation equivalent of the water car. It has already been debunked.
This e-cat company is nothing more than fraud. If they really have this tech, what's stopping them from selling?
I've talked to some Astrophysicists Ph.Ds and one told me that she honestly thinks Cold Fusion isn't even physically or atomically possible. It is considered pseudo-science.

It does not matter if it's cold fusion or pixie dust in action. What matters is that if the independent is to be believed then the device produced 1.5 MWh of clean energy for 32 days with a COP of 3.2 to 3.8.
 
.
It does not matter if it's cold fusion or pixie dust in action. What matters is that if the independent is to be believed then the device produced 1.5 MWh of clean energy for 32 days with a COP of 3.2 to 3.8.

The "independent test" is not to be believed. It is simply too good to be true.
 
. .
Let's wait and see. Even the US government is showing renewed interest in Cold fusion lately.

Please quote a source for the US government's interest that you mention. Thanks!
 
.
Another water engineer story. I took great interest in the 80's and 90's when these same stories did the rounds. As a physics grad I wanted this to true but of all the hundreds of experiments done as specified by the enthusiasts showed no discernible or measurable cold fusion. Thousands of man hours were lost before all had to conclude that these are fantasies. I do regret these new medicine men of science foisting lies to a gullible non scientific community promising endless riches. In the UK we have just jailed a guy for selling bomb detectors with a unique technology. He sold them to the Iraqis Pakistanis etc etc and made millions. These detectors were of course fake.
The law will eventually catch up with these charlatans and soft soap salesmen.
 
.
This e-cat company is nothing more than fraud. If they really have this tech, what's stopping them from selling?

Dude, I have an open mind on cold fusion. This thing has been lingering on for decades in many many labs man. And I think there might have been a hatchet job in suppressing the research.
 
.
It does not matter if it's cold fusion or pixie dust in action. What matters is that if the independent is to be believed then the device produced 1.5 MWh of clean energy for 32 days with a COP of 3.2 to 3.8.
Chance are, it could be a smart hoax, with a single hidden cable go to standard power outlet to generate all that mysterious energy.....
The researchers are very careful about not actually saying that cold fusion/LENR is the source of the E-Cat’s energy, instead merely saying that an “unknown reaction” is at work. In serious scientific circles, LENR is still a bit of a joke/taboo topic. The paper is actually somewhat comical in this regard: The researchers really try to work out how the E-Cat produces so much darn energy — and they conclude that fusion is the only answer — but then they reel it all back in by adding: “The reaction speculation above should only be considered as an example of reasoning and not a serious conjecture.”
 
.
Another water engineer story. I took great interest in the 80's and 90's when these same stories did the rounds. As a physics grad I wanted this to true but of all the hundreds of experiments done as specified by the enthusiasts showed no discernible or measurable cold fusion. Thousands of man hours were lost before all had to conclude that these are fantasies. I do regret these new medicine men of science foisting lies to a gullible non scientific community promising endless riches. In the UK we have just jailed a guy for selling bomb detectors with a unique technology. He sold them to the Iraqis Pakistanis etc etc and made millions. These detectors were of course fake.
The law will eventually catch up with these charlatans and soft soap salesmen.
Theoritically can you reject this like water car ?
 
.
Please quote a source for the US government's interest that you mention. Thanks!

NASA’s cold fusion tech could put a nuclear reactor in every home, car, and plane | ExtremeTech

In the last decade US navy and DARPA have been investigating too. Surely, if it's basis are as weak as water car then any interest from these institution would have been out of question.

Chance are, it could be a smart hoax, with a single hidden cable go to standard power outlet to generate all that mysterious energy.....

The opened it up and did analysis of the fuel after the test. Any such cable would have seen when they opened it. Plus the hidden cable would need to be connected to a power source too:)
 
Last edited:
.
NASA’s cold fusion tech could put a nuclear reactor in every home, car, and plane | ExtremeTech

In the last decade US navy and DARPA have been investigating too. Surely, if it's basis are as weak as water car then any interest from these institution would have been out of question...............

None of those experiments have resulted in useful power:

"So why don’t we have LENR reactors yet? Just like fusion, it is proving hard to build a LENR system that produces more energy than the energy required to begin the reaction. In this case, NASA says that the 5-30THz frequency required to oscillate the nickel lattice is hard to efficiently produce."
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom