What's new

CJP formed 8 Member bench on Supreme court Practice and Procedure illegal act 2023

Soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo if PDM passes a paedophilia promotion act tomorrow that would be ok?

Considering Lumber 1 and their BDSM lover PDM are all so fond of picking up people to gawk at their shafts and shit; maybe the bill is in the works as well.
Parliament is supreme. If PDM has most elected representatives and they pass a bill there is nothing you can do about it. This is how democracy and legislation works. You sound like a cry baby. Have PTI come up with numbers first and most importantly attend assembly rather than sit on the streets or run off to western politicians and media
 
.
Parliament is supreme. If PDM has most elected representatives and they pass a bill there is nothing you can do about it. This is how democracy and legislation works. You sound like a cry baby. Have PTI come up with numbers first and most importantly attend assembly rather than sit on the streets or run off to western politicians and media
LMAO, PDM supporter advocating paedophilia just as their master.
 
. .
Parliament is supreme. If PDM has most elected representatives and they pass a bill there is nothing you can do about it. This is how democracy and legislation works. You sound like a cry baby. Have PTI come up with numbers first and most importantly attend assembly rather than sit on the streets or run off to western politicians and media
No you cant pass a law overruling constitution. On one side you are crying about democracy and parliaments supremacy (half empty fyi), on the other hand look how you are breaking constitution by blocking provincial elections in Punjab and KPK. The impact will be far reaching as provinces trust on constitution and center has been badly damaged
 
. .
What a country.

No wonder Allah’s wrath is upon such nation.

PM thief, parliament corrupt, establishment compromised, judiciary divided.

If they are successful, then this sets a precedent for a complete break down of law and order.
 
.
Parliament is supreme. If PDM has most elected representatives and they pass a bill there is nothing you can do about it. This is how democracy and legislation works. You sound like a cry baby. Have PTI come up with numbers first and most importantly attend assembly rather than sit on the streets or run off to western politicians and media
Incorrect. Constitution is supreme, unless amended by a super majority. The proposed bill is trying to skirt the constitution by saying they are amending administrative and procedural acts, but by doing so are infringing over the constitution.

It's like saying I am not amending the constitution which protects the President's powers but am just passing an administrative legislation which says the President cannot have access to any state information.
 
.
The only acceptable 8-member bench for the Gangs of Sharif's:
1 Justice Matiullah JAN (Chief Justice)
2 Justice Wajih Sani
3 Justice Hamid Mir
4 Justice Talat Hussain
5 Justice Hassan Ayub
6 Justice Saleem Safi
7 Justice Asma Shirazi
8 Justice Gharidah

Registrar: Asad Toor
 
.
BC yae mulk nhi lucky Irani circus chal raha hy. Like F’in Tom and Jerry, Kutay, billi aur choey ka tamasha.


1681439389361.gif

GHQ, Parliament (PDM) and Judiciary.
 
.
If elected officials are subverting the constitution with the help of certain other unelected officials (the boys), then there's one unelected official whose literal job it is to put a stop to that.
The same unelected official who was influenced by them to remove elected ones? Right...
 
.
By that logic they can’t include QFI and the other senior judge as he gets to be a beneficiary too. Its a procedure update, so every judge is impacted. What needs to be seen is if Parliament can interfere in internal workings of SC and if law can be questioned before it takes effect.
Hasba bill knock out on exactly same stage but no one raise the voice. Why now.


 
Last edited:
.
The same unelected official who was influenced by them to remove elected ones? Right...
Right. He did wrong once. Now how can we ever let him do right again?
Esp when he intends to right the aforementioned wrong.

Silly me.
 
.
.
I think this was a shrewd move on the part of the CJP because he showed the majority to be on his side and providing a united front.

I will hold my judgement whether this was a shrewd move or not, but definitely a statement of intent that he isn't going to back down.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom