Rajaraja Chola
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
- Messages
- 9,051
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Yes I understand what you mean, that you're against the manipulation of poor.
Christian missionaries 're offering money to the poor because the poor would do a harmless conversion in return for money.But in that case I would say the rich temples that we have don't take care of these poor.I've not understood whats the use of stacking so much money in temples when it can be given as alms. Infact doesn't the charity money that we offer in temples meant to take care of the poor?
We should not be complaining if the poor of our religion 're taking shelter of other religions.
You talk as if Temples are free my dear levina ji. Temples are under the control of govt, and temples need to pay govt for taking care of it, as if they management boards cannot take care of it, and they also cannot spend it freely as we think they can.
What can they do? Tirupathi sits alone atop thousands, perhaps lakhs of crores of wealth. If it can, it can give so much money freely to poor peoples. But can it?
Secularist will never allow temples allow out of govt control. It means a lots of money to politicians. Just before yu ask me how, let me quote a example.
A famous temple in Chennai, Parthasarathy temple, ancient one, has its land enroached by shop keepers , and lands given as rent, are as mean as possible. Now the shops for rent are given and decided by politicians here, and they get the commissions accordingly. Temples are under clutches, which needed to be freed. Then you will be hearing stories how western poors are converting to Hinduism for the sake of money.