What's new

chinese withdrawal

China tacitly acknowledges withdrawal of troops from Ladakh

BEIJING: Tacitly acknowledging the withdrawal of its troops from Depsang Valley in Ladakh, China on Monday said the "stand-off" with India was resolved through "fruitful consultations", keeping the larger interests of bilateral relations in mind.

"Following the stand-off'at the border area, China and India with the larger interests of bilateral relations in mind have taken a cooperative and constructive attitude," Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said.

The two sides exercised restraint and properly handled the incident through relevant mechanisms, diplomatic channels and border meetings, she said.

In her first comments after the decision of the two countries to withdraw troops from the Daulat Beg Oldi (DBO) area after a 20-day stand-off, Hua said, "As far as I know relevant consultations have been fruitful".

"We believe that maintaining peace and tranquillity in the border areas serve the common interests of the two sides. China is ready to join hands with the Indian side to seek a mutually acceptable and fair solution to the border question at an early date", she said.

Pressed for more details on the settlement, including dismantling of tents erected by the PLA, Hua said, "I need to follow closely the latest information".

"As I said before the two sides bear in mind the larger interests of bilateral relations," she said.

The two sides have taken a constructive and cooperative attitude and have maintained communication and consultation and made positive progress, Hua said.

"I will share with you relevant information if I get the latest information," she said.

Asked whether the Chinese troops moved back from their position, when did that happen and how far they withdrew, she replied, "I have said the two sides have been constructive and cooperative and have been maintaining communications through relevant mechanism in the border regions".

"Relevant consultations have made positive progress. I know you are very concerned about this and I must follow the information to tell you the correct information", Hua said.

"I believe the Chinese and Indian sides should maintain peace and tranquillity in the border areas and work for the smooth development of bilateral relations", she said.

China tacitly acknowledges withdrawal of troops from Ladakh - The Times of India
 
.
Chinease backed down .....they bottled it. Paper dragon.

India did this

15808826-angry-elephant-vector-mascot-illustration.jpg



then China did this

10385791-funny-cartoon-dragon.jpg


and went back :lol:
 
.
well lets see

1. We agreed to slow down construction of bunkers not to stop it.

2.India did not agree to stop modernisation of Daulat Beg Oldi and Nayoma airfields in Ladakh, which according to China poses a strategic threat to Karakoram Highway

3.While the Government is willing to give and take on the issue of slowing down construction of bunkers and other developmental works in this region, halting the modernisation of the airfields as part of proposed bargain is ruled out, they said.
You agreed to dismantle the outpost at Chumar. :lol: Now Chumar is China's territory again. What an easy nation to intimidate. No other nation would tolerate foreign troops. India not only tolerated our soldiers, and backed away timidly, now you capitulated and carved away territory without firing a shot!

:omghaha:


Ladakh stand-off ends as China agrees to pull out troops - The Times of India

Did India make a deal?

The Chinese had been insisting that India dismantle its security and monitoring posts built in Chumar and other areas. India had resisted this because Chumar is considered to have strategic significance, particularly since Indian soldiers can monitor troop movements across the Line of Actual Control from there.

Before the news of the troops withdrawing was announced, some sources had said India might agree to remove some of the structures as "a face saver" to enable the Chinese troops to withdraw to their pre-April 15 positions. Analysts said if the Indian government had indeed agreed to make a deal with the Chinese, this kind of incursion would be repeated over and over again.

The Chinese intransigence had created a political problem with memories of the 1962 war and India's humiliating defeat by China playing in everyone's minds. Both the ruling Congress party and the opposition had asked for Khurshid's visit to be cancelled after Chinese troops refused to withdraw despite three flag meetings with the Indian side.
 
.
You agreed to dismantle the outpost at Chumar. :lol: Now Chumar is China's territory again. What an easy nation to intimidate. No other nation would tolerate foreign troops. India not only tolerated our soldiers, and backed away timidly, now you capitulated and carved away territory without firing a shot!

:omghaha:


Ladakh stand-off ends as China agrees to pull out troops - The Times of India

Did India make a deal?

The Chinese had been insisting that India dismantle its security and monitoring posts built in Chumar and other areas. India had resisted this because Chumar is considered to have strategic significance, particularly since Indian soldiers can monitor troop movements across the Line of Actual Control from there.

Before the news of the troops withdrawing was announced, some sources had said India might agree to remove some of the structures as "a face saver" to enable the Chinese troops to withdraw to their pre-April 15 positions. Analysts said if the Indian government had indeed agreed to make a deal with the Chinese, this kind of incursion would be repeated over and over again.

The Chinese intransigence had created a political problem with memories of the 1962 war and India's humiliating defeat by China playing in everyone's minds. Both the ruling Congress party and the opposition had asked for Khurshid's visit to be cancelled after Chinese troops refused to withdraw despite three flag meetings with the Indian side.

There is no source which says so. Show me such source

The link and article you posted also don't prove your claim, as article uses word might

Like I said RazPak's old signature perfectly fits first three posts of this thread(and rest of your posts too), which is also my response to these posts :lol:
 
. . . . .
THE CHINEASE HAVE AS MUCH CHANCE of india backing down in LADAKH as the Pakistanis have seen in saichen & kashmir.

what is in indian hands WILL REMAIN in indian hands

THIS IS WHY WE SPEND $40 BILLION a year on our military

WE SAFEGUARD OUR TERRITORY BORDERS * INTERESTS at all costs.

WE RELY ON CHINA for absolutely NOTHING we are STRONG INDEPENDANT NATION

we expect nothing off china AND WE WILL GIVE not an inch
india should learn from tajikstan.
they give us a tiny land and everyone are happy. century-old border dispute solved

BBC News - Tajikistan cedes land to China
 
. . . .
lol. at your knowledge
India always believed that area was disputed. i was china who solely beleives that the area was of china and not disputed. it is india who is going to use this instance in future

lol, at YOUR knowledge. The Indians consider the whole area as an integral part of India, that includes Jammu and Kashmir. You need to learn geography and politics, ha.

The Chinese also believe that it's their land too, but they just wanted to force India to admit that China has a reasonable claim.

You are likening it to an intruder who has come into your house and then per agreement both leave the house. That depiction is incorrect, think of it like a garden where cattle trundles in, after they have left you will not forever camp in the garden.

But you are free to walk in it whenever you please. There is no guarantee that cattle wont stray in again, but you will beat them back, this time more aggressively.

:disagree: The situation is completely different, as the cattle aren't armed with heavily weapons that are capable of starting wars. The next time this happens, and I guarantee it will, the Indians will again refuse to "beat them back" as they know a war with China is foolish. The Chinese WANT the Indians to fire the first shot, as it will make India look like the aggressor and give China an excuse to use military force.
 
.
Just for the sake of posting,don't post BS.
Mutual withdrawal from the place where China had set up camps in the no man's land.China claims it as its own territory as well,so the compromise is from China who went in and then retreated,India was never up for military escalation,our offer was dialogue and that is what will happen now.

That is exactly what the Chinese wanted, for the Indians to admit that the area is disputed territory. By having a mutual withdrawal, instead of withdrawing after a Chinese retreat, they've admitted that China has a legitimate claim to the area in question.

Don't be so naive and defensive to believe that India didn't lose anything in the confrontation, in fact the Indians lost the right to say that the area is Indian 100%.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom