What's new

Chinese scientist says first gene-edited babies have been born (with born-immunity to HIV)

52051

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 9, 2016
Messages
2,245
Reaction score
-11
Country
China
Location
China
A Chinese researcher says his lab facilitated the first birth of gene-edited children — twin girls who are said to possess genetic alterations that could protect them from HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.

“Two beautiful little Chinese girls, named Lulu and Nana, came crying into this world as healthy as any other babies a few weeks ago. The girls are home now,” He Jiankui, a researcher at the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, said in a YouTube video.

If confirmed, the report is certain to bring the ethical issues surrounding human genetic engineering into sharp focus, and could lead either to rapid developments in the technology or regulatory limits.

He’s lab made clear that Lulu and Nana are pseudonyms, which are being used to protect their privacy. The names that He gave for the parents, Mark and Grace, are presumably pseudonyms as well.

In a series of videos, He said his lab devised the experiment to help parents with the HIV virus feel more confident about having children. Mark, the father of Lulu and Nana, has HIV, the researcher said.

“Employers fire people like Mark,” He said. “Doctors deny medical care, and even forcibly sterilize women. Mark and Grace couldn’t bear to bring a child into that world of fear. … A gene surgery that could save a child from a lethal genetic disease like cystic fibrosis or life-threatening infection like HIV doesn’t just give that little boy or girl an equal chance at a healthy life. We heal a whole family.”

The Associated Press quoted He as saying that he practiced using the CRISPR gene-editing technique on animal subjects for several years. Then, working through an advocacy group for HIV patients, He’s lab signed up couples for in-vitro fertilization. According to the AP account, researchers altered 16 embryos to disable a gene known as CCR5, which plays a key role in the spread of the HIV virus.

“This surgery removed the doorway through which HIV enters to infect people,” He said on video.

Eleven of the embryos were used in six implant attempts before the twin pregnancy was achieved, He told AP. Genetic tests conducted after the girls’ birth confirmed that changes in the CCR5 gene persisted, the researcher said.


AP quoted He as saying that both copies of the CCR5 gene had been disabled for one of the girls, while only one gene of the pair was disabled for the other girl. At least one of the twins appeared to have a patchwork of altered and unaltered cells, scientists familiar with the experiment told AP.

Further details about He’s research project were reported by MIT Technology Review, based on Chinese medical documents posted online.

There was no independent confirmation of the experiment’s results, which have not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal. The reports about the Chinese clinical trials coincide with an international summit on gene editing that’s scheduled in Hong Kong this week.

AP’s report suggests that outside researchers are already raising questions about the ethics of the experiment. Harvard geneticist George Church, a pioneer in the field of gene editing, was quoted as saying that He’s goal was “justifiable” but questioned whether the partially altered embryo should have been implanted.

There are also questions about how much information about the experiment was given in advance to Chinese health officials or to the parents. Moreover, the genetic mutation in the CCR5 gene that protects against HIV is known to raise a person’s vulnerability to flu viruses and the West Nile virus.

The experiment’s lead researcher said he was ready to take the heat.

“I understand my work will be controversial,” He said, “but I believe families need this technology, and I’m willing to take the criticism for them.”

The controversy is sure to continue in the weeks and months ahead. And the first task will be to get outside confirmation that He and his team have actually done what they say they’ve done. In this regard, the scandal that erupted more than a decade ago over fraudulent claims of human embryonic stem cell cloning in South Korea serves as a cautionary tale.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/chinese-scientist-says-first-gene-061431180.html
 
. . . .
Yes becos the baby is produced by China. If is a western baby. They will sing a different tune.
I am willing to bet that you have NOT done research on the criticisms of genetic research in the West. :enjoy:
 
.
13259543_f520.jpg
 
.
This is inevitable since we have an idea of who these creatures from people’s encounters actually are:

greyAlien_Colstudy1_abaker.jpg
 
.
A Chinese researcher says his lab facilitated the first birth of gene-edited children — twin girls who are said to possess genetic alterations that could protect them from HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.

“Two beautiful little Chinese girls, named Lulu and Nana, came crying into this world as healthy as any other babies a few weeks ago. The girls are home now,” He Jiankui, a researcher at the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, said in a YouTube video.

If confirmed, the report is certain to bring the ethical issues surrounding human genetic engineering into sharp focus, and could lead either to rapid developments in the technology or regulatory limits.

He’s lab made clear that Lulu and Nana are pseudonyms, which are being used to protect their privacy. The names that He gave for the parents, Mark and Grace, are presumably pseudonyms as well.

In a series of videos, He said his lab devised the experiment to help parents with the HIV virus feel more confident about having children. Mark, the father of Lulu and Nana, has HIV, the researcher said.

“Employers fire people like Mark,” He said. “Doctors deny medical care, and even forcibly sterilize women. Mark and Grace couldn’t bear to bring a child into that world of fear. … A gene surgery that could save a child from a lethal genetic disease like cystic fibrosis or life-threatening infection like HIV doesn’t just give that little boy or girl an equal chance at a healthy life. We heal a whole family.”

The Associated Press quoted He as saying that he practiced using the CRISPR gene-editing technique on animal subjects for several years. Then, working through an advocacy group for HIV patients, He’s lab signed up couples for in-vitro fertilization. According to the AP account, researchers altered 16 embryos to disable a gene known as CCR5, which plays a key role in the spread of the HIV virus.

“This surgery removed the doorway through which HIV enters to infect people,” He said on video.

Eleven of the embryos were used in six implant attempts before the twin pregnancy was achieved, He told AP. Genetic tests conducted after the girls’ birth confirmed that changes in the CCR5 gene persisted, the researcher said.


AP quoted He as saying that both copies of the CCR5 gene had been disabled for one of the girls, while only one gene of the pair was disabled for the other girl. At least one of the twins appeared to have a patchwork of altered and unaltered cells, scientists familiar with the experiment told AP.

Further details about He’s research project were reported by MIT Technology Review, based on Chinese medical documents posted online.

There was no independent confirmation of the experiment’s results, which have not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal. The reports about the Chinese clinical trials coincide with an international summit on gene editing that’s scheduled in Hong Kong this week.

AP’s report suggests that outside researchers are already raising questions about the ethics of the experiment. Harvard geneticist George Church, a pioneer in the field of gene editing, was quoted as saying that He’s goal was “justifiable” but questioned whether the partially altered embryo should have been implanted.

There are also questions about how much information about the experiment was given in advance to Chinese health officials or to the parents. Moreover, the genetic mutation in the CCR5 gene that protects against HIV is known to raise a person’s vulnerability to flu viruses and the West Nile virus.

The experiment’s lead researcher said he was ready to take the heat.

“I understand my work will be controversial,” He said, “but I believe families need this technology, and I’m willing to take the criticism for them.”

The controversy is sure to continue in the weeks and months ahead. And the first task will be to get outside confirmation that He and his team have actually done what they say they’ve done. In this regard, the scandal that erupted more than a decade ago over fraudulent claims of human embryonic stem cell cloning in South Korea serves as a cautionary tale.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/chinese-scientist-says-first-gene-061431180.html

Awesome
 
. . . .
I'm all for gene editing within certain limits. We know there are certain genes which cause disabilities or life altering diseases. If research can prove that altering that 1 gene, or set of genes can stop people from getting that disease, I think its a great step forwards.

We must be careful though to check for any other regressive impact altering that gene might have. Where we don't have sufficient data on that, i think we should model that, before trying it on humans.

I disagree with gene altering for "improvement" or "personalisation". Choosing gender, eye colour, adjusting height or skin tone, or all these sorts of things - it's where a line should be drawn. We risk endangering genetic variation.

Similarly we shouldn't be fine-tuning humans to make them faster or stronger. I suspect this sort of thing will have negative impacts and might lead to a biological arms race.

Funny to see so many people try to play God. In the end, it will be a failure.

I disagree. It's no different to organ transplants or medicine. The world around is there to be discovered - we aren't making up cheat codes, we are learning with the tools Allah has given us, and acting upon the instinct he has instructed us to act upon.
 
.
I'm all for gene editing within certain limits. We know there are certain genes which cause disabilities or life altering diseases. If research can prove that altering that 1 gene, or set of genes can stop people from getting that disease, I think its a great step forwards.

We must be careful though to check for any other regressive impact altering that gene might have. Where we don't have sufficient data on that, i think we should model that, before trying it on humans.

I disagree with gene altering for "improvement" or "personalisation". Choosing gender, eye colour, adjusting height or skin tone, or all these sorts of things - it's where a line should be drawn. We risk endangering genetic variation.

Similarly we shouldn't be fine-tuning humans to make them faster or stronger. I suspect this sort of thing will have negative impacts and might lead to a biological arms race.

That's true
 
.
Great news! Don't need to import over-priced drugs from the West, especially the US.
 
.
Funny to see so many people try to play God. In the end, it will be a failure.


That little baby have father with HIV/AIDS, and if Chinese Scientist don't edit those little baby gene.
Those baby have high potential to have HIV/AIDS for their entire life, and get discrimination along their life from other people. Wherever they go.

Chinese Scientist already save 2 little baby life with gene editing.

I wonder why your GOD disagree with human editing to save people from disease, meanwhile it's normal for people to build Bomb and weapon to kill others?

For me, I believe my GOD always support whatever effort we do to make all human have a Happy and Peaceful life.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom