What's new

Chinese Missiles News & Discussions

Super staring infrared imaging system for high-speed high-acceleration surface-2-air missile interceptor and new generation long-range A2A missile(not the one you have seen):coffee::enjoy::tup:

本项目针对影响大气层内高速导弹光学成像探测精度的气动光学效应这一“瓶颈”问题,成功建立了结合流场仿真数据和风洞测试试验图像进行气动光学效应退化机理分析和气动光学效应图像校正方法研究的技术理论;并研制了“气动光学效应图像校正仿真平台”。

本项目得到了武器装备预研基金和国防基础科研项目的支持。研究工作在以下方面取得了突破性进展: 提出了基于流场数值计算的光线追迹模型,给出了光线在高速流场中的理论传输特性,提高了气动光学效应图像仿真的真实度。 提出了“误差-参数分析”的气动光学效应降晰函数辨识方法,并通过对风洞测试试验图像的处理,验证了气动光学效应图像退化模型辨识方法的有效性。 在复原过程中引入气动光学效应退化模型和成像物理模型约束,提出了总变分极小化的图像复原新方法,实现了对恢复图像边缘的有效保持以及对振铃效应和噪声的有效抑制,较好地解决了盲目图像恢复算法的病态性问题,提高了校正效果。

研制的“气动光学效应图像校正仿真系统”,其软件子系统模块化程度高,稳定性好,可扩展性和可移植性强;其硬件子系统具有快速实现气动光学效应校正的功能。目前已应用于国家重大背景型号项目研究,使我国的高速导弹成像探测气动光学效应校正技术取得重大进展,具有重要军事价值。相关的研究成果可用于以下技术领域:

1)为了实现在大气层内直接碰撞、动能杀伤机动目标,我国重点发展的“杀手锏”武器——高速高加速飞行的“地对空反导武器系统”和重大背景型号新一代远程空空导弹,将采用凝视红外成像系统作为关键部件,其中的气动光学效应问题非常突出,是影响其作战效能的瓶颈之一,需要对其进行校正。

2)我国现有的战术地地导弹大多采用单一的惯性制导方式,在不能提供高精度陀螺惯导平台的情况下,制导精度在百米量级,无法实现远程精确摧毁敌方地面硬目标和海上活动目标的要求。采用光学/惯性复合制导技术可以大大提高其制导精度,但在导弹高速重返大气层时,也存在着严重的气动光学效应问题。

3)为了提高飞航导弹的生存能力,发展高马赫数的飞航导弹是一个研究方向,其中光学成像系统的气动光学效应问题也需要解决。

4)在大气层内或水下进行光学观测,也存在着模糊、抖动和偏移等图像退化问题,要实现精确观测,也需要解决退化图像的校正问题。
 
Cutting edge, world beating......technology :coffee::cheers::enjoy::tup::china:

http://news.china.com/domestic/945/20170207/30237105_all.html

中国研发新型弹片材料 二次爆炸威力惊人

【观察者网综合】科学网2月7日报道,北京理工大学教授王海福,二十年痴心不改强军梦。在2016年度国家科学技术奖励大会上,有66项成果获得了国家技术发明奖项目,其中有一项名为“活性毁伤元技术”的项目获得了二等奖。文中提到,“活性毁伤元技术”是一种新型的战斗部材料技术。

观察者网军事评论员表示,从国外一些类似设想来看,这应该是一种大幅提升导弹武器战斗部的毁伤能力的新技术,理论上可让导弹毁伤飞机的半径增加一倍。不过目前世界上其他国家,包括最初提出类似构想的美国,都尚未取得实际研制成果。

6459f070-7e3b-4277-9adb-ae3cd617e6b8.jpg


美国海军曾在2002年提出过类似爆炸毁伤元的想法,号称能100%提高导弹毁伤半径,然而这个项目似乎没有了下文,似乎又是一个美国负责“想”,中国负责“干”的例证. :D:D

@Bussard Ramjet

但大幅度提高武器的威力是世界公认的重大瓶颈性难题。王海福主持的项目正是针对该技术难题。

我们发明的新型爆炸材料毁伤元,既具有类似金属的力学强度,又含有与高能炸药相当的化学能,还具有与惰性材料类似的安全性,可以直接机械加工,只有高速命中目标后才会发生爆炸。”王海福说,以前的惰性金属毁伤元只能通过纯动能毁伤目标,而这种新型材料毁伤元具备动能穿孔和爆炸作用的双重毁伤能力,威力会成倍性提升

而对于该研究成果的技术水平和地位,王海福坦言:“近二十年来,如果把我国武装装备研制和发展看作是一个从全面跟踪追赶,到部分并跑甚至有限领跑的过程,那么本项技术发明成果无疑属于并跑或引领。

Super staring infrared imaging system for high-speed high-acceleration surface-2-air missile interceptor and new generation long-range A2A missile(not the one you have seen):coffee::enjoy::tup:

本项目针对影响大气层内高速导弹光学成像探测精度的气动光学效应这一“瓶颈”问题,成功建立了结合流场仿真数据和风洞测试试验图像进行气动光学效应退化机理分析和气动光学效应图像校正方法研究的技术理论;并研制了“气动光学效应图像校正仿真平台”。

本项目得到了武器装备预研基金和国防基础科研项目的支持。研究工作在以下方面取得了突破性进展: 提出了基于流场数值计算的光线追迹模型,给出了光线在高速流场中的理论传输特性,提高了气动光学效应图像仿真的真实度。 提出了“误差-参数分析”的气动光学效应降晰函数辨识方法,并通过对风洞测试试验图像的处理,验证了气动光学效应图像退化模型辨识方法的有效性。 在复原过程中引入气动光学效应退化模型和成像物理模型约束,提出了总变分极小化的图像复原新方法,实现了对恢复图像边缘的有效保持以及对振铃效应和噪声的有效抑制,较好地解决了盲目图像恢复算法的病态性问题,提高了校正效果。

研制的“气动光学效应图像校正仿真系统”,其软件子系统模块化程度高,稳定性好,可扩展性和可移植性强;其硬件子系统具有快速实现气动光学效应校正的功能。目前已应用于国家重大背景型号项目研究,使我国的高速导弹成像探测气动光学效应校正技术取得重大进展,具有重要军事价值。相关的研究成果可用于以下技术领域:

1)为了实现在大气层内直接碰撞、动能杀伤机动目标,我国重点发展的“杀手锏”武器——高速高加速飞行的“地对空反导武器系统”和重大背景型号新一代远程空空导弹,将采用凝视红外成像系统作为关键部件,其中的气动光学效应问题非常突出,是影响其作战效能的瓶颈之一,需要对其进行校正。

2)我国现有的战术地地导弹大多采用单一的惯性制导方式,在不能提供高精度陀螺惯导平台的情况下,制导精度在百米量级,无法实现远程精确摧毁敌方地面硬目标和海上活动目标的要求。采用光学/惯性复合制导技术可以大大提高其制导精度,但在导弹高速重返大气层时,也存在着严重的气动光学效应问题。

3)为了提高飞航导弹的生存能力,发展高马赫数的飞航导弹是一个研究方向,其中光学成像系统的气动光学效应问题也需要解决。

4)在大气层内或水下进行光学观测,也存在着模糊、抖动和偏移等图像退化问题,要实现精确观测,也需要解决退化图像的校正问题。

It would be really helpful by posting a bit of over-view and possible translated script for the ease of readers to understand otherwise, IMO, none other than Chinese would be able to read it or find it helpful at all. Hope you understand..

Regards,
 
It would be really helpful by posting a bit of over-view and possible translated script for the ease of readers to understand otherwise, IMO, none other than Chinese would be able to read it or find it helpful at all. Hope you understand..

Regards,

No translation from the reporting media, unfortunately. Google Translate is the best alternative for non-Chinese readers. That's what I do regularly with foreign language articles.
 
The Chinese is an exception the rules. You did not know that ?

Oh.. Come on Sir ----I was serious.... but now am :-) ... However, by such remarks, the thread will be going off-road soon and there is no exception.

No translation from the reporting media, unfortunately. Google Translate is the best alternative for non-Chinese readers. That's what I do regularly with foreign language articles.

Well IMO, Google translator can skip or wrongly translate the contexts hence, A Chinese Friend familiar with English can at-least share key points, conclusion by translating an overview so would be more beneficial.
 
So was I.

Got you


Do you know why the WORKING language of aviation is English ? It was because a common language has to be used and since English was already the dominant language in aviation, English became the official unofficial language of aviation. Likewise, on an anonymous Internet forum that intends to have as wide an audience as possible, a common language must be used, so English was used for PDF.

Agreed that English is most spoken and common among the nations hence, used commonly so that everyone can understand the contexts and the same would be helpful to read and educate one self. Yes, these are the reasons as the same is used for PDF.


The reason why the Chinese members of this forum often posts in Chinese is because they believe they can get away with it, and why/where that belief came from is because they were ALLOWED to do so. The allowance may not be official but inferred from lack of enforcement of the rules. Essentially, if you do something contrary to norms and consistently got away with it, pretty much you are the exception to the rules.

I beg to differ here and I don't think so as the same would be the reason however, would like to say that few times gone unnoticed and leaving the same to get away can actually affect interest of the readers. I am not hiding such posts/reporting the same for moderation because an info may loss hence, have been asking for translations to the respective members with most conclusion or an overview. @Deino @ahojunk @Shotgunner51 can we try to enforce the rule as mush as possible for the quality and information so that more readers can take part into discussions.
 
If you cannot understand, then it is the same as lost.

The point of having a common language is because of that fear of information that is lost on the general readership, lost as in gone over one's head -- whooosh.

The point of having a common language is to disseminate whatever information to as wide a range of readership as possible. What the Chinese members are doing is trying to turn this subforum into their own by way of discouragement.

This is grossly disrespectful to both the creators of this forum and to the readership that the creators wanted to reach.

But do the Chinese care that they are being disrespectful to everyone ? No.


Chief, let's play it low (at-least from my end for the sake of thread and topic).

I fully agree with you w.r.t. not understanding a post means, already a lost cause and the point w.r.t. choosing English for the forum is clear as well.

I am sure, Chinese members have no intention as such to turn this forum into abc but I myself, have found many of our friends stating as clearly that as English is not common spoken for them hence, sometimes avoid it and also, there are few words/contexts in Chinese that actually cannot be translated at all though I do agree that, a minimum overview with general description and translation would be helpful yet I am sure too that it is not a deliberate thing that even PDF Admin is aware fully. There is no disrespect in it at all. I know that due to conflict in arguments between you and Chinese, things sometimes went wrong that I have been reading most of the posts with interest but it doesn't mean that someone is favoured over other and difference in opinion is actually beneficial for all. Personal attacks or offensive posting should not be tolerated at all, without any difference.
 
Get away with what? A crime? Many threads in this forum has often interjected in their respective national language, so what? No one is forcing YOU to read. The problem is YOU who make it a problem in your persistent, rabid, anti-Chinese fervor.

Viets would do well making the mastery of Chinese as the most important event in their life.

Guys, don't escalate things that have no purpose but derailing and going off-topic. I mean, there is no need to do as such. There is a key called "agree to disagree and move on" to work with anything when someone dislike a content on personal ground or in-case of an offense, use the report button and leave it to the respective team. Also, we need to make sure that at-least a post consist of Chinese Language, be translated with an overview/conclusion statement for the interest non-Chinese readers and quality discussion.
 
US-Japanese Missile Test Could Prompt China to Upgrade its Nuclear Arsenal

Sputnik, 2017-02-09

Last week, the United States and Japan successfully tested the Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) Block IIA missile defense system. An interceptor was launched from the USS John Paul Jones missile destroyer and took out a medium-range target ballistic missile. The test took place off the Hawaiian island of Kauai.

The test came as a new reminder for Russia and China that they should not stop modernizing their strategic arsenals, taking into account the advanced capabilities of the US missile defense shield, Russian military expert Vasily Kashin said.

According to information from the US military, unlike the previous versions of the SM-3 missile, the SM-3 Block IIA is capable of intercepting not only middle-range missiles but also intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM).

1030990768.jpg

Admiral: US Navy Top Priority to Deploy Next Generation Strategic Missile Subs

Russia began developing anti-missile defense measures in advance. Russia’s main advantages are a rich and advanced arsenal of nuclear weapons delivery, an immense territory and geographical proximity to the US. Due to these factors, missile defenses of the US and its Asian allies cannot intercept Russian missiles at launch. As for the European missile shield, it covers only a small part of the Russian strategic arsenal.

In turn, China is in a more complicated situation, taking into account the capacity of its nuclear arsenal. The majority of China’s missiles are middle-range and vulnerable to missile defenses.

In the light of the ongoing expansion of the US’ missile defense, China’s intercontinental ballistic missile arsenal may be insufficient to guarantee a retaliatory strike.

Russia to Boost Far East Missile Defense Amid China's ICBM Deployment - MP

"Beijing should also take into account the upcoming deployment of US THAAD missile systems to South Korea and Japan," Kashin commented to Sputnik Chinese.

The expert also noted that taking into the account the scope of US and Japanese missile defense efforts, it is "ridiculous" to justify the initiative with possible threats from North Korea or Iran.

"Iran doesn’t have nuclear weapons and is unlikely to develop an ICBM in the foreseeable future. As for North Korea, due to the lack of resources and technologies, it has a small arsenal of faulty ballistic missiles," Kashin pointed out.

The main goal of the US’ missile defense deployment plan is to gain an advantage over Russia and, what is more important, to gain the upper hand over China’s nuclear arsenal.

"Washington believes that this would force Beijing abandon its hardline foreign policy strategy aimed at protecting national interests. However, such an assumption is based on underestimating China’s capabilities to expand its nuclear arsenal," the expert pointed out.

Meanwhile, in recent years, China has put much effort to increasing capacities of its missile-manufacturing industry. Reserves of the space industry could now also be recruited to boost production of strategic missiles. It is also noteworthy that during the final stage of the Cold War China conducted certain research and development works in the field but then abandoned them due to political reasons.

1024639105.jpg

Russia-US Cooperation on Missile Defense 'Lies Far Beyond the Horizon'

"Deployment of DF-41 missiles and tests of the DF-5C carrying 10 warheads prove that China is capable of rapidly modernizing its offensive potential. Possibly, its will expand even faster than US missile defense aimed at deterring China. In this case, none of the sides will get the upper hand, but global security will be damaged," Kashin concluded.

=====================================


READ ALSO:

New US Missile Hits Target in Space

1050410991.jpg

Sputnik, 2017-02-07

The US Department of Defense Missile Defense Agency and Raytheon have successfully tested a missile that intercepts enemy missiles in space.

The SM-3 IIA missile can sense ballistic missile attacks from space and neutralize the threats. The SM-3 made its debut by eliminating a ballistic missile fired from the Navy’s USS John Paul Jones destroyer.

The idea for the mission was conceived and motivated, in part, by Star Wars, according to Scout Warrior’s Kris Osborn. “Now that technology is getting better,” he said, “exoatmospheric” missiles can intercept short- and medium-range ballistic missiles descending from outer space. The anti-missile technology would come in handy if the medium-range DF-16 missile tested by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army gets deployed.

The next-generation missile is being developed by both Washington and Tokyo, Scout reported. Further, the US plans to deploy the missile in Poland by 2018. The successful launch took place in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of Hawaii.
[...]
https://sputniknews.com/military/201702071050411099-new-missile-hits-space-target/
 
Last edited:
Cutting edge, world beating......technology :coffee::cheers::enjoy::tup::china:

http://news.china.com/domestic/945/20170207/30237105_all.html

中国研发新型弹片材料 二次爆炸威力惊人

【观察者网综合】科学网2月7日报道,北京理工大学教授王海福,二十年痴心不改强军梦。在2016年度国家科学技术奖励大会上,有66项成果获得了国家技术发明奖项目,其中有一项名为“活性毁伤元技术”的项目获得了二等奖。文中提到,“活性毁伤元技术”是一种新型的战斗部材料技术。

观察者网军事评论员表示,从国外一些类似设想来看,这应该是一种大幅提升导弹武器战斗部的毁伤能力的新技术,理论上可让导弹毁伤飞机的半径增加一倍。不过目前世界上其他国家,包括最初提出类似构想的美国,都尚未取得实际研制成果。

6459f070-7e3b-4277-9adb-ae3cd617e6b8.jpg


美国海军曾在2002年提出过类似爆炸毁伤元的想法,号称能100%提高导弹毁伤半径,然而这个项目似乎没有了下文,似乎又是一个美国负责“想”,中国负责“干”的例证. :D:D

@Bussard Ramjet

但大幅度提高武器的威力是世界公认的重大瓶颈性难题。王海福主持的项目正是针对该技术难题。

我们发明的新型爆炸材料毁伤元,既具有类似金属的力学强度,又含有与高能炸药相当的化学能,还具有与惰性材料类似的安全性,可以直接机械加工,只有高速命中目标后才会发生爆炸。”王海福说,以前的惰性金属毁伤元只能通过纯动能毁伤目标,而这种新型材料毁伤元具备动能穿孔和爆炸作用的双重毁伤能力,威力会成倍性提升

而对于该研究成果的技术水平和地位,王海福坦言:“近二十年来,如果把我国武装装备研制和发展看作是一个从全面跟踪追赶,到
部分并跑甚至有限领跑的过程,那么本项技术发明成果无疑属于并跑或引领。

For non-Chinese readers:

The article basically says that a professor from Beijing Institute of Technology recieved state prize for science and tech advancement, second class, for he has developed a new material called damaging element or whatever tech term.

The material has several ways to enhance its damaging radius, it offer both superior explosive and impact damaging characters, and it is actually very stable, comparable to inert material.

The material is mean to be used to build warhead of missiles, it can enhance the missiles's kill radius by 100% with the same payload.

In the end of the article, the author mentioned that the Americans try to do similar things since 1990s, but they fail to develop a working one up to now.

And the authors mock that this is the usual pattern that the Americans are representable for dreaming and the Chinese are representable for making things happen.:lol:
 
For non-Chinese readers:

The article basically says that a professor from Beijing Institute of Technology recieved state prize for science and tech advancement, second class, for he has developed a new material called damaging element or whatever tech term.

The material has several ways to enhance its damaging radius, it offer both superior explosive and impact damaging characters, and it is actually very stable, comparable to inert material.

The material is mean to be used to build warhead of missiles, it can enhance the missiles's kill radius by 100% with the same payload.

In the end of the article, the author mentioned that the Americans try to do similar things since 1990s, but they fail to develop a working one up to now.

And the authors mock that this is the usual pattern that the Americans are representable for dreaming and the Chinese are representable for making things happen.:lol:

Thank you for the explanation :D
 
https://sputniknews.com/military/201702091050498845-us-missile-defense-china/

Last week, the United States and Japan successfully tested the Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) Block IIA missile defense system. An interceptor was launched from the USS John Paul Jones missile destroyer and took out a medium-range target ballistic missile. The test took place off the Hawaiian island of Kauai.

The test came as a new reminder for Russia and China that they should not stop modernizing their strategic arsenals, taking into account the advanced capabilities of the US missile defense shield, Russian military expert Vasily Kashin said.

According to information from the US military, unlike the previous versions of the SM-3 missile, the SM-3 Block IIA is capable of intercepting not only middle-range missiles but also intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM).

Russia began developing anti-missile defense measures in advance. Russia’s main advantages are a rich and advanced arsenal of nuclear weapons delivery, an immense territory and geographical proximity to the US. Due to these factors, missile defenses of the US and its Asian allies cannot intercept Russian missiles at launch. As for the European missile shield, it covers only a small part of the Russian strategic arsenal.

In turn, China is in a more complicated situation, taking into account the capacity of its nuclear arsenal. The majority of China’s missiles are middle-range and vulnerable to missile defenses.

In the light of the ongoing expansion of the US’ missile defense, China’s intercontinental ballistic missile arsenal may be insufficient to guarantee a retaliatory strike.

"Beijing should also take into account the upcoming deployment of US THAAD missile systems to South Korea and Japan," Kashin commented to Sputnik Chinese.

The expert also noted that taking into the account the scope of US and Japanese missile defense efforts, it is "ridiculous" to justify the initiative with possible threats from South Korea or Iran.

"Iran doesn’t have nuclear weapons and is unlikely to develop an ICBM in the foreseeable future. As for North Korea, due to the lack of resources and technologies, it has a small arsenal of faulty ballistic missiles," Kashin pointed out.

The main goal of the US’ missile defense deployment plan is to gain an advantage over Russia and, what is more important, to gain the upper hand over China’s nuclear arsenal.

"Washington believes that this would force Beijing abandon its hardline foreign policy strategy aimed at protecting national interests. However, such an assumption is based on underestimating China’s capabilities to expand its nuclear arsenal," the expert pointed out.

Meanwhile, in recent years, China has put much effort to increasing capacities of its missile-manufacturing industry. Reserves of the space industry could now also be recruited to boost production of strategic missiles. It is also noteworthy that during the final stage of the Cold War China conducted certain research and development works in the field but then abandoned them due to political reasons.

"Deployment of DF-41 missiles and tests of the DF-5C carrying 10 warheads prove that China is capable of rapidly modernizing its offensive potential. Possibly, its will expand even faster than US missile defense aimed at deterring China. In this case, none of the sides will get the upper hand, but global security will be damaged," Kashin concluded.
 
CASIC's kinetic energy terminal missile interceptor system(Project 8102)

CASIC.jpg


won 2013 National Science & Technology Progress Award 2nd Class. :enjoy:
 
Last edited:
CASIC's kinetic energy terminal missile interceptor system(Project 8102)

View attachment 375867

won 2013 National Science & Technology Progress Award 2nd Class. :enjoy:
It's awarded around three years ago :coffee: so quite possibly the invention had been turned into operational products nowadays.
 
Last edited:
It's awarded around three years ago :coffee: so quite possibly the invention had been turned into operational products nowadays.

动能末端低层反导拦截系统,射高相当于美军爱国者3改进型反导导弹,2011年5月15日第一次试验成功,2013年12月25日获国家科技进步二等奖。:D:enjoy:
 
动能末端低层反导拦截系统,射高相当于美军爱国者3改进型反导导弹,2011年5月15日第一次试验成功,2013年12月25日获国家科技进步二等奖。:D:enjoy:
from cirr's post above - thanks fyi :enjoy:
:china:
"Kinetic energy at the end of the lower missile interception system, much equivalent to the American Patriot 3 modified anti-missile missiles, on May 15, 2011 for the first time the trial was successful; on December 25, 2013 it won the national scientific and technological progress second prize."
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom