What's new

Chinese Journalist Fired for Being Critical

ajtr

BANNED
Joined
May 25, 2010
Messages
9,357
Reaction score
0
Chinese Journalist Fired for Being Critical


(BEIJING) — A Chinese journalist known for being critical of the government said Friday that he's been fired by one of the country's most daring media companies for refusing to tone down his writing, the latest sign of China's tightening grip on press freedom.
Chang Ping, a former editor and columnist for publications owned by the Southern Media Group, said the dismissal wasn't linked to any single piece of writing but rather his consistently critical tone.
(Read a brief history of China's censorship policy.)
China's censors routinely scrub domestic news and online content of material they consider destabilizing or threatening to the communist leadership, but the Internet is so vast and porous that forbidden information increasingly gets through to the public. This has emboldened many Chinese journalists and publications to push the boundaries in their reporting, a trend the government is trying to contain.
Chang's employer confirmed he had been let go but wouldn't say why.
"Chang Ping's contract expired and it was not renewed," said a woman surnamed Deng who answered the phone at the Southern Metropolis Daily, one of the papers Chang used to write for. She said editors were too busy to be interviewed and that the paper had nothing more to add about the situation.
Chang, 42, drew fire from authorities and other domestic columnists in 2008 when he wrote an editorial saying that foreign media should be allowed to report firsthand on bloody ethnic riots in Tibet and advocating dialogue between the Chinese government and the Dalai Lama. He's also written about corruption and China's need for greater political and personal freedoms.
(Read about China's 'Great Firewall' post-Google.)
Southern Media Group's two main publications, Southern Metropolis Daily and Southern Weekend, stopped publishing his commentaries six months ago, he said.
The Guangzhou-based writer said that he thought his dismissal was part of a Chinese campaign against free speech and press that has intensified since jailed democracy activist Liu Xiaobo was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in November.
"I am very angry that I've been punished for my words," Chang said. "The bigger picture, the background is that I am not the only one. There have been other editors recently with other papers that have been dealt with as well."
He cited two recent incidents documented by the Hong Kong-based China Media Project, which keeps track of media reform trends in mainland China. The first was the firing of Long Can, a journalist with the Chengdu Commercial Daily in Sichuan who was dismissed last week after writing about official negligence and influence peddling related to the botched rescue of a group of university students in a remote scenic area. Because of mishandling, a police officer died in the rescue.
He also pointed to a separate China Media Project report about Peng Xiaoyun, an editor with Time Weekly, who was forced into involuntary leave after his publication came out with a list of influential people that included a jailed Chinese food activist and several people who had signed Charter '08, a bold call for political reform co-authored by Liu, the Nobel Prize winner.


Read more: Chinese Journalist Fired for Being Critical - TIME
 
If 90% chinese suppor the govt, and as china is doing gr8 on all fronts, then why this?

You've just answered your own question.

It's just good business sense. Why lose customers for no gain?

As you said, international polls show overwhelming Chinese support for the CPC Government. So of course you should give the readers what they want to read, or you will lose business.
 
1, support this government does not equal support for all of his policies.

2, free speech does not mean telling lies for profit, does not mean to speak for the West.

Well done.
 
You've just answered your own question.

It's just good business sense. Why lose customers for no gain?

As you said, international polls show overwhelming Chinese support for the CPC Government. So of course you should give the readers what they want to read, or you will lose business.

Do you mean to say that The News should be The Popular News, i.e. news that people want to hear?
That would hardly be journalism, it may be propaganda or advertising. One ensures overwhelming support, the other good business or gain.
What about journalism/facts/news?
 
Do you mean to say that The News should be The Popular News, i.e. news that people want to hear?
That would hardly be journalism, it may be propaganda or advertising. One ensures overwhelming support, the other good business or gain.
What about journalism/facts/news?

That is how business works. :no:

This is quite a funny complaint, coming from an Indian. Have you read the ToI?
 
everybody knows how govt controls everything including media in china..our chinese members can always say business reasons, lies etc but will that change the fact ? No.but that is the price you pay for your fast growth and development..
hope in future media will be more free and independent..or you are happy with current system ?
 
Do you mean to say that The News should be The Popular News, i.e. news that people want to hear?
That would hardly be journalism, it may be propaganda or advertising. One ensures overwhelming support, the other good business or gain.
What about journalism/facts/news?

His being fired is not a surprise.


Reporters Without Borders ranks China's press situation as "very serious", the worst ranking on their five-point scale.[3] China's Internet censorship policy is labeled as "pervasive" by the OpenNet Initiative's global Internet filtering map, also the worst ranking used.[4] Freedom House ranks the press there as "not free", the worst ranking, saying that "state control over the news media in China is achieved through a complex combination of party monitoring of news content, legal restrictions on journalists, and financial incentives for self-censorship.
Censorship in the People's Republic of China - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
That is how business works. :no:

This is quite a funny complaint, coming from an Indian. Have you read the ToI?

Good business? Good business is when people stop reading because they don't like it and then the reporter gets fired, not when the govt gets it done because they want to control public opinion.

Thats how business works, and thats how authoritative regimes work. Nice try at obfuscation and deflection though.
 
Good business? Good business is when people stop reading because they don't like it and then the reporter gets fired, not when the govt gets it done because they want to control public opinion.

Thats how business works, and thats how authoritative regimes work. Nice try at obfuscation and deflection though.

Do you have any proof that the Government ordered his termination?

Or are you just talking for the sake of it?
 
Do you have any proof it was done for good business, or are you still trying at deflection?

Have you actually even read the article?

"Chang Ping's contract expired and it was not renewed," said a woman surnamed Deng who answered the phone at the Southern Metropolis Daily, one of the papers Chang used to write for.

His contract expired and his employer decided not to renew it. Nowhere did it say that he was "terminated" by the Government.

Now, in order to back up your silly attacks against me, please qualify this statement you made:

Good business? Good business is when people stop reading because they don't like it and then the reporter gets fired, not when the govt gets it done because they want to control public opinion.

Thats how business works, and thats how authoritative regimes work. Nice try at obfuscation and deflection though.

And let's not get into conspiracy theory territory here.
 
Last edited:
The Chinese government is too indulgent to some media, they blatantly false in many ways, as long as against the government, made up the story than an emphasis fact on news.
 
Back
Top Bottom