What's new

Chinese electromagnetic launcher (railgun, coilgun .etc) informational pool

I'd like to ask if this is a 10MJ railgun or a 10MJ facility.



The latter, given the implication of >30% efficiency, would make this a >3MJ Railgun.

It is a 10 MJ railgun. The efficiency of the French-german 10 MJ railgun is also 30%.

Guys ... can we try to leave out India?

it is irrelevant.

Deino

Hi, Deino. May I keep edit the #1 and #2 in future? I have more information and source for that.
 
Last edited:
Soon as Indian rail gun test news arrive, this thread was started. Typical inferiority complex of chinese.
What exactly is your point? India may have had a prototype decades ago ... yes, that may be true. But a prototype will always remain a prototype ... I have not seen one application of such railgun currently in the Indian military. Nor have I seen extensive research into railgun tech conducted by India in recent years. This reminds me of how the Indians boast of their *future* nuclear propulsion or *future* electromagnetic catapults. Unfortunately for India, there is little if any substance to such ridiculous claims. It seems as if India tries harder to compare itself to China than actually progressing on their indigenous industry.

Please don't put India and China in the same sentence, we are way out of your league and frankly it's very embarrassing your media constantly compare china to India.

We don't want to be associated with India
Unfortunately Indians have the incessant need to compare themselves to China, especially in military. But the glass ceiling just gets higher and higher for them every year ... they will get tired at some point.
 
Guys ... can we try to leave out India?

it is irrelevant.

Deino

Looks like #2 was blocked again after I added a new link on it. So I have to post new reply if I want to add something.
 
Looks like #2 was blocked again after I added a new link on it. So I have to post new reply if I want to add something.

Actually i don't know why this thread again was "closed" for moderation ... ?
 
:coffee::enjoy::china:

关于国内电磁炮,属于国内十二五、十三五重点科研项目,目前就有不少于5家的科研院校和机构在搞攻关研究,都有自己的实验系统,目前技术水平略高于美国NRL、IAT和法国ISL的系统

202所已经有人提出要搞电磁迫击炮,方案中射程比传统自行迫击炮射程增加30%以上,携弹量增加3至4倍,据称,技术上已经基本没有什么问题,

装工院提出的全电战车方案,采用综合电力系统,动力驱动、火力系统及防护均为电力(电机驱动、电炮和电装甲),动力驱动系统体积仅为传统动力驱动的40%,火力系统为多功能型(直瞄反装甲、间瞄火力压制和防空反导),射程要求达到10公里,防护系统要求能抵御住国产125毫米炮贫铀穿甲弹在2000米的射击(穿深1050mm均质钢水平)

再扯一句,某高校某院士研发的某口径多功能火炮,技术思路是对的,但还属于传统火炮的挖潜,有诸多局限,其实用化战术技术价值有望在电炮上实现(某校的徒子徒孙们如有冒犯请轻拍)
 
:coffee::enjoy::china:

关于国内电磁炮,属于国内十二五、十三五重点科研项目,目前就有不少于5家的科研院校和机构在搞攻关研究,都有自己的实验系统,目前技术水平略高于美国NRL、IAT和法国ISL的系统

202所已经有人提出要搞电磁迫击炮,方案中射程比传统自行迫击炮射程增加30%以上,携弹量增加3至4倍,据称,技术上已经基本没有什么问题,

装工院提出的全电战车方案,采用综合电力系统,动力驱动、火力系统及防护均为电力(电机驱动、电炮和电装甲),动力驱动系统体积仅为传统动力驱动的40%,火力系统为多功能型(直瞄反装甲、间瞄火力压制和防空反导),射程要求达到10公里,防护系统要求能抵御住国产125毫米炮贫铀穿甲弹在2000米的射击(穿深1050mm均质钢水平)

再扯一句,某高校某院士研发的某口径多功能火炮,技术思路是对的,但还属于传统火炮的挖潜,有诸多局限,其实用化战术技术价值有望在电炮上实现(某校的徒子徒孙们如有冒犯请轻拍)

https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/30869/PR_150.pdf?sequence=1
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6325173/
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.04143.pdf
IAF is an institution of Texas University in Austin. They established the 10 MJ railgun facility (90mm) in 1990. NRL established the 10 MJ facility (more advance with smaller caliber) in 2006. These two institutions do not have the best railgun prototypes in US. ISL (German-French Research Institute of Saint-Louis) own the best railgun facility in Europe. But they did not build any new prototype after eastablished a 10 MJ railgun system (Pegasus) in 2000.
 

Attachments

  • ADA477050.pdf
    299.2 KB · Views: 71
I'd like to ask if this is a 10MJ railgun or a 10MJ facility.



The latter, given the implication of >30% efficiency, would make this a >3MJ Railgun.

Sorry, I made a mistake. I read the journals about Eurpean ISL Pegasus railgun again. It is a 10 MJ facility like Chinese one, not a 10 MJ railgun. Also the Chinese 32 MJ program is just updating the facility to 32 MJ.
 
805a77b85e43404e9d283317785e99fc.jpg


:coffee::lol::D
 
Back
Top Bottom