Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This thing is fully electric and does 155 miles per charge.
Problem with electric vehicle is that you still need a source of energy to generated the electricity required. It would suck to have "clean" electric cars, only to have to use more fossil fuel, coal or natural gas at the generating station. For this reason I think hybrids are actually cleaner than true electric vehicles, since they can charge up their own batteries.
You need to remember that renewable energy only accounts for a tiny fraction (less than 5%) of our total electric generation. Vast majority of electricity (>80%) is generated through burning of coal, oil and natural gas. In addition, renewable energy does not have a very high yield, thus they are unlikely to have greater than 20% of market shares in the future even if quadrupled in sizes.Yes, but also remember that we are the world's number 1 producer of "renewable energy", even more than the entire European Union combined:
List of countries by electricity production from renewable sources - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I have seen other data that shows China has more than enough "potential" renewable energy (hydroelectric/wind/etc) that we can become fully self-sustainable if we are able to harness it.
Of course we won't be able to harness all of it, but our renewable energy expansion plans are very ambitious. Maybe not in the near future, but in the far future we can think about having the majority of our energy coming from renewable sources.
It's a good goal to have, and who knows what technological advances will be discovered in the next few years or the next few decades, that will make this even more feasible.
You need to remember that renewable energy only accounts for a tiny fraction (less than 5%) of our total electric generation. Vast majority of electricity (>80%) is generated through burning of coal, oil and natural gas. In addition, renewable energy does not have a very high yield, thus they are unlikely to have greater than 20% of market shares in the future even if quadrupled in sizes.
Maybe not in the near future, but in the far future
The issue is precisely that we have to look at the near future, and not look beyond that. Next 10 years is crucial to China's economic transition from a developing country to a developed country. Our industrial output has surpassed the Americans, and more and more Chinese are buying various vehicles. The demand for energy is going to be huge. If you have a house that is leaking water in the rain, you can't depend on building a new roof a week later, because you need to plug the holes now.You're right. That's why the emphasis in my post was not on the "near future" but specifically on the "far future".
No better time to think about the future than today.
Clearly, based on contemporary technology, it's not efficient enough in terms of cost. Except maybe hydro-power in the long run. But that is sure to change.
The issue is precisely that we have to look at the near future, and not look beyond that. Next 10 years is crucial to China's economic transition from a developing country to a developed country. Our industrial output has surpassed the Americans, and more and more Chinese are buying various vehicles. The demand for energy is going to be huge. If you have a house that is leaking water in the rain, you can't depend on building a new roof a week later, because you need to plug the holes now.
Our shale gas is located in touch geographic areas compared to US. A lot of the reserves are under mountains and not on flat lands. The current shale gas extraction technology is made to extract shale has from flat lands because most of America's shale gas is on flat land so they developed the tech to suit their geography.
We will need to innovate the technology to suit our geography.