What's new

China’s new supercarrier will soon undergo first sea trials, officer says

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,191
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China

China’s new supercarrier will soon undergo first sea trials, officer says​

By Brad Lendon, CNN
Published 10:34 PM EST, Tue January 3, 2023

230103210115-cns-fujian-010323.jpg

China's third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, at a launch ceremony in Shanghai on June 17, 2022.

Seoul, South KoreaCNN —

The Chinese navy’s massive new aircraft carrier, the CNS Fujian, is expected to head to sea for the first time this year, the ship’s executive officer said in an interview with state media.

In a report on the interview published Tuesday by state-run China Daily, Senior Capt. Qian Shumin did not give an exact date for when the aircraft carrier will undergo its first sea excursions, saying only that “the trials will contribute to the realization of the centenary goals of the People’s Liberation Army.”

That centenary, which comes in 2027, was referenced by Chinese leader Xi Jinping in October as a deadline for the PLA to meet its modernization goals.

The Fujian is the largest warship China has ever built and bringing it into operation is a key component in the PLA Navy’s objectives.

The ship was launched with great fanfare on June 17 and has been in the final stages of construction at a Shanghai shipyard.

Hawaii-based analyst Carl Schuster, a former US Navy captain, said he expects the Fujian’s first trials to come in the spring.

“Based on the technologies and systems installed on the Fujian, the first sea trials will be conducted on/about March 2023 and consist of basic engineering and ship’s maneuvering tests,” said Schuster, a former director of operations at the US Pacific Command’s Joint Intelligence Center.

He said the initial trials would likely last three to seven days.

They would be the first steps in an approximately 18-month-long series of trials that could see the Fujian become operational by October 2024, Schuster said.

“Each trial will be followed by an examination of what went right and wrong; and solutions to those problems, whether human or equipment-related, are identified and applied, respectively,” he said.

Displacing around 80,000 metric tons of water, according to the China Daily report, the Fujian is 50% larger than China’s two current in-service carriers and puts the PLA Navy in the league of supercarriers, like the 100,000-ton US Nimitz-class ships.

It also shows China matching US carrier technology.

China’s other two carriers, the Liaoning and the Shandong, are based on outdated Soviet technology. Those two carriers used the ski-jump launching system, in which where planes simply take off from a slight ramp, while US carriers use a more advanced catapult system to launch their aircraft.

And the Fujian uses an electomagnetic catapult system, something the US has only on its newest operational carrier, the USS Gerald Ford.

Schuster says integrating the Fujian’s air wing into its operations using that new technology will be the final key part of its trials, and he expected that to come sometime in the summer of 2024.

 
Incredible. Truly incredible.

It's amazing (and depressing) to examine how the trajectory of Pakistan and China, with relatively similar (in the modern era) starting points and histories of imperial exploitation by the West, have diverged.
 
Incredible. Truly incredible.

It's amazing (and depressing) to examine how the trajectory of Pakistan and China, with relatively similar (in the modern era) starting points and histories of imperial exploitation by the West, have diverged.
China's level of governance is incomparable to any part of the world. Unmatched. Incredibly competent.

Meanwhile we basically have the opposite.
 
China's level of governance is incomparable to any part of the world. Unmatched. Incredibly competent.

Meanwhile we basically have the opposite.

Yes, yes. I've studied it in exceptional detail. It's significantly more efficient than any democracy, because long-term policy is made and simply implemented. No ifs and buts or populist appeasement.

It's also not a dictatorship, as many people wrongly believe.
 
Implementing the exact same model is probably not ideal but a derivative with slight adjustments for our circumstances yes.
True, every country should adopt their own unique development style originated and developed in their own culture, blindly copying western system coming from a very different cultural base is suicidal. you can't grow bananas in Siberia,
 
True, every country should adopt their own unique development style originated and developed in their own culture, blindly copying western system coming from a very different cultural base is suicidal. you can't grow bananas in Siberia,
Yes one party state system with Islamic characteristics for Pakistan.
 
Incredible. Truly incredible.

It's amazing (and depressing) to examine how the trajectory of Pakistan and China, with relatively similar (in the modern era) starting points and histories of imperial exploitation by the West, have diverged.
Even during its darkest period, China didn't have the equivalent of Sepoys whereas we have been beset by the said sepoys since 1750's.
 
Last edited:
Yes one party state system with Islamic characteristics for Pakistan.
It is exactly the "Islamic characteristics" that most explains the developmental "divergence" between Pakistan and China. China could never have become the nation it is today if it had "Islamic characteristics". "Confucian characteristics"? Yes, yes and yes.
 
Can't wait until China has more ACG than the US!
That's more or less impossible.

China has a smaller coastline than the CONUS, and even US only able to support 11 smaller Carrier (LHA) and 10 Fleet Carrier because they have overseas bases (Japan, Hawaii, Diego Garcia, Guam, Puerto Rico, for example). If US only have CONUS Coastline, they can probably support around 5 to 6 fleet Carrier. For China to have more ACG than US, China first need to have more overseas bases than US. This is more or less impossible this day.

Don't forget, US have enough facilities to service 20 Fleet Carrier at the same time, which mean if US is mad on military and don't care about money, they could have built 30 or 35 fleet carrier and support that, but that would cost them helluva money...
 
Last edited:
That's more or less impossible.

China has a smaller coastline than the CONUS, and even US only able to support 11 smaller Carrier (LHA) and 10 Fleet Carrier because they have overseas bases (Japan, Hawaii, Diego Garcia, Guam, Puerto Rico, for example). If US only have CONUS Coastline, they can probably support around 5 to 6 fleet Carrier. For China to have more ACG than US, China first need to have more overseas bases than US. This is more or less impossible this day.

Don't forget, US have enough facilities to service 20 Fleet Carrier at the same time, which mean if US is mad on military and don't care about money, they could have built 30 or 35 fleet carrier and support that, but that would cost them helluva money...
We will just wait and see on this one.
 
It is exactly the "Islamic characteristics" that most explains the developmental "divergence" between Pakistan and China. China could never have become the nation it is today if it had "Islamic characteristics". "Confucian characteristics"? Yes, yes and yes.
Wow you moron. Are you suggesting Islam is to be blamed for Pakistan not progressing.

You are such an ignorant moron. Some of the greatest achievements were done in Muslim majority countries.

Like Algebra, Fountain Pen, Taj Mahal, city of Samarkand in Uzbekistan.

Some of the greatest intellectuals of all time like Al-Kharizmi, Ibn Sina, and Ibn Khaldun.

The reason Pakistan is not progressing is because of bad governance and social injustices you idiot.

Most people in Pakistan want an Islamic government.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom