What's new

China's J-15 Carrier-Based Fighter is Inferior to Russian Su-33 fighter: Russia

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lankan Ranger

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
12,550
Reaction score
0
China's J-15 Carrier-Based Fighter is Inferior to Russian Su-33 fighter: Russia

China's J-15 carrier-based fighter will not be able to compete with Russia's Su-33 fighter on global markets because it is inferior to the Russian aircraft, a Russian military analyst said on Friday.

China since 2001 has been developing the J-15 naval fighter, which is believed to be a clone of Russia's Su-33 Falcon-D. China bought an Su-33 prototype earlier from Ukraine, and used it to develop the new aircraft.

The J-15 is expected to be stationed initially onboard the Chinese Varyag aircraft carrier currently being fitted in the port of Dalian. China bought the unfinished Admiral Kuznetsov class aircraft carrier from Ukraine in 1998.

"The Chinese J-15 clone is unlikely to achieve the same performance characteristics of the Russian Su-33 carrier-based fighter, and I do not rule out the possibility that China could return to negotiations with Russia on the purchase of a substantial batch of Su-33s," said Col. (Ret.) Igor Korotchenko, a member of the Defense Ministry's Public Council.

The Su-33 is a carrier-based multi-role fighter, which can perform a variety of air superiority, fleet defense, air support and reconnaissance missions.

The aircraft entered service with the Russian Navy in 1995 and are currently deployed on board the Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier.

Korotchenko said China was unlikely to solve technical problems related to the design of the folding wings and to develop a reliable engine for the aircraft, although the first J-15 prototype reportedly made its maiden flight on August 31, 2009, powered by Chinese WS-10 turbofan engines.

China and Russia had been in negotiations on the sale of the Su-33 Flanker-D fighters to be used on future Chinese aircraft carriers since 2006, but the talks collapsed over China's request for an initial delivery of two aircraft for a "trial."

Russian Defense Ministry sources confirmed that the refusal was due to findings that China had produced its own copycat version of the Su-27SK fighter jet in violation of intellectual property agreements.

In 1995, China secured a $2.5-billion production license from Russia to build 200 Su-27SKs, dubbed J-11A, at the Shenyang Aircraft Corp.

The deal required the aircraft to be outfitted with Russian avionics, radars and engines. Russia cancelled the arrangement in 2006 after it discovered that China was developing an indigenous version, J-11B, with Chinese avionics and systems.

The decision came after China had already produced at least 95 aircraft.Last year, Russia refused again to sell the Su-33 to China even after Beijing had offered to buy 14 of them, saying that at least 24 jets should be sold to recoup production costs.

ASIAN DEFENCE: China's J-15 Carrier-Based Fighter is Inferior to Russian Su-33 fighter: Russia
 
"The deal required the aircraft to be outfitted with Russian avionics, radars and engines. Russia cancelled the arrangement in 2006 after it discovered that China was developing an indigenous version, J-11B, with Chinese avionics and systems."

i thought it was the other way round.

sounds desperate..
 
Its too Early to say who's superiour or inferior, when they compete against each other or when they will compete against enemy jets..yet su-33 isn't tested in war
 
Navkhan tell me which of china's jet fighter at present been tested in war? Russia is shifu of china. Didnt russia recently warned china? And china backed off without any delay? Russian warned china that russia is far superior than china and any move by china will result in china's end. Russia shown china its nuclear stock pile. Google it. (if google works in china than chinese too can google it).
 
Navkhan tell me which of china's jet fighter at present been tested in war? Russia is shifu of china. Didnt russia recently warned china? And china backed off without any delay? Russian warned china that russia is far superior than china and any move by china will result in china's end. Russia shown china its nuclear stock pile. Google it. (if google works in china than chinese too can google it).

A perfect example of overdose from your Indigenous coke, shooting trash out of control.:smitten::hang2:
 
Navkhan tell me which of china's jet fighter at present been tested in war? Russia is shifu of china. Didnt russia recently warned china? And china backed off without any delay? Russian warned china that russia is far superior than china and any move by china will result in china's end. Russia shown china its nuclear stock pile. Google it. (if google works in china than chinese too can google it).

and any attack on china by russia means, if not russia's end as a civilization, then its permanent end as a world power.

but both russia and USA can nuke india with no negative consequences, there is no nation in the world that can nuke china with no negative consequences. in fact with our new ABM system or a first strike on india we can take out india with few negative consequences.
 
Navkhan tell me which of china's jet fighter at present been tested in war? Russia is shifu of china. Didnt russia recently warned china? And china backed off without any delay? Russian warned china that russia is far superior than china and any move by china will result in china's end. Russia shown china its nuclear stock pile. Google it. (if google works in china than chinese too can google it).

And in the border conflict, why showed who had nuclear weapons? Looks like the ol' Ruskies were pretty freaked out too. Who went from Fission to fusion in the shortest time period? Think before you want to talk nuclear. Also, you have no audacity to talk, India got wasted and wasted bad, so bye bye.

P.S. India should stick to this:

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=curry
 
and any attack on china by russia means, if not russia's end as a civilization, then its permanent end as a world power.

but both russia and USA can nuke india with no negative consequences, there is no nation in the world that can nuke china with no negative consequences. in fact with our new ABM system or a first strike on india we can take out india with few negative consequences.

Ya Russia and US can nuke India but Why ? Just because China want them to. :D

Looks like the virus of nuking India in this forum is catching up ! Soon we will have trolls nuking India in every other post.
:cheers:
 
China's J-15 Carrier-Based Fighter is Inferior to Russian Su-33 fighter: Russia

China's J-15 carrier-based fighter will not be able to compete with Russia's Su-33 fighter on global markets because it is inferior to the Russian aircraft, a Russian military analyst said on Friday.

China since 2001 has been developing the J-15 naval fighter, which is believed to be a clone of Russia's Su-33 Falcon-D. China bought an Su-33 prototype earlier from Ukraine, and used it to develop the new aircraft.

The J-15 is expected to be stationed initially onboard the Chinese Varyag aircraft carrier currently being fitted in the port of Dalian. China bought the unfinished Admiral Kuznetsov class aircraft carrier from Ukraine in 1998.

"The Chinese J-15 clone is unlikely to achieve the same performance characteristics of the Russian Su-33 carrier-based fighter, and I do not rule out the possibility that China could return to negotiations with Russia on the purchase of a substantial batch of Su-33s," said Col. (Ret.) Igor Korotchenko, a member of the Defense Ministry's Public Council.

The Su-33 is a carrier-based multi-role fighter, which can perform a variety of air superiority, fleet defense, air support and reconnaissance missions.

The aircraft entered service with the Russian Navy in 1995 and are currently deployed on board the Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier.

Korotchenko said China was unlikely to solve technical problems related to the design of the folding wings and to develop a reliable engine for the aircraft, although the first J-15 prototype reportedly made its maiden flight on August 31, 2009, powered by Chinese WS-10 turbofan engines.

China and Russia had been in negotiations on the sale of the Su-33 Flanker-D fighters to be used on future Chinese aircraft carriers since 2006, but the talks collapsed over China's request for an initial delivery of two aircraft for a "trial."

Russian Defense Ministry sources confirmed that the refusal was due to findings that China had produced its own copycat version of the Su-27SK fighter jet in violation of intellectual property agreements.

In 1995, China secured a $2.5-billion production license from Russia to build 200 Su-27SKs, dubbed J-11A, at the Shenyang Aircraft Corp.

The deal required the aircraft to be outfitted with Russian avionics, radars and engines. Russia cancelled the arrangement in 2006 after it discovered that China was developing an indigenous version, J-11B, with Chinese avionics and systems.

The decision came after China had already produced at least 95 aircraft.Last year, Russia refused again to sell the Su-33 to China even after Beijing had offered to buy 14 of them, saying that at least 24 jets should be sold to recoup production costs.

ASIAN DEFENCE: China's J-15 Carrier-Based Fighter is Inferior to Russian Su-33 fighter: Russia

And why does Russia always underestimate us all the time? Making up so many false accusations only to find out we beat all their claims a decade in advance :D. Stupid Russians.
 
中华人民共和国;910835 said:
And why does Russia always underestimate us all the time? Making up so many false accusations only to find out we beat all their claims a decade in advance :D. Stupid Russians.

这说明现在的毛子已经没有以前那么有信心了,以前和米帝比,现在要轮到和TG比了,以后看来只能和三锅比了。。。
 
中华人民共和国;910835 said:
And why does Russia always underestimate us all the time? Making up so many false accusations only to find out we beat all their claims a decade in advance :D. Stupid Russians.

and to Market their technology, as fear in their heart is growing day by day that Chinese may capture their Market....;)
 
这说明现在的毛子已经没有以前那么有信心了,以前和米帝比,现在要轮到和TG比了,以后看来只能和三锅比了。。。

now that's not fair!!!!!!!!!! You should use English so that we can also understand your post..:undecided::undecided:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom