China’s Defiance of International Court Has Precedent—U.S. Defiance

[lcloo]

The international court has one European appointee from philippines, and four appointees (One African and three Europeans from NATO nations) from a Japanese ex-embassador to USA. And the Japaneses ex-embassador is an Abe associates.

What more is there to say?

Should China initiate her own court ruling on bombing of China embassy by self claimed "world policeman"?

 

[beijingwalker]

China self certified itself as suppa power.
We never did, neither we are one. We know our limits

Foreign countries did, we never do. China never certified herself as a super power but US and Europeans publish and claim it almost everyday. That's the fact that everyone knows but you.

 

[JohnyD]

China is so sure that the verdict will not be in its favor...so they have again proved it themselves that they are the aggressor and bullying the neighboring countries...

 

[unbiasedopinion]

So is China going to follow the bad Uncle SAM;s precedent and thinking of projecting by replacing a big bad boy (US) as another bad boy.
The biggest slap on the fact of existing bad boi (US) will be to abide by the court;s order and show to the world the respect you give to these institutes thus gaining more respect.
Just abiding by the courts verdict when it favors you and rejecting when if it against will not show you a great growing power.

 

[GS Zhou]

China self certified itself as suppa power.
We never did, neither we are one. We know our limits

At least our president Xi Jingping says China remains as a developing country, in his speech made during the 2016 US visit.

https://www.ncuscr.org/content/full-text-president-xi-jinpings-speech

Meanwhile, the India President Kalam said India would become a super power by 2012. So, 2016 is the 5th year since India becomes a super power. Could you pls tell us the feeling to live in the superpower India?

http://articles.economictimes.india...s/28389376_1_space-programme-kalam-superpower

 

[CorporateAffairs]

Meanwhile, the India President Kalam said India would become a super power by 2012. So, 2016 is the 5th year since India becomes a super power. Could you pls tell us the feeling to live in the superpower India?
View attachment 316335

Yes, Kalam is always right. But he didnot know that India will be ruled by Anti National party which will loot the country left right and center. Its our democracy which let us down.
good, you dont have such "democratic" issues.

 

[GS Zhou]

Yes, Kalam is always right. But he didnot know that India will be ruled by Anti National party which will loot the country left right and center. Its our democracy which let us down.
good, you dont have such "democratic" issues.

But Indian National Congress rules India till mid-2014. Correct? By that time India has already become a super power, according to the "always right" Kalam.

 

[Jlaw]

, P5 aint powerfull enuf to do that.

sure they are powerful enough. They been denying Indian permanent seat in UN for ages.

 

[CorporateAffairs]

But Indian National Congress rules India till mid-2014. Correct? By that time India has already become a super power, according to the "always right" Kalam.

Nope, while Kalam was at the heck of the things, Nationalist BJP was in power, hence he might have made that statement.

sure they are powerful enough. They been denying Indian permanent seat in UN for ages.

UNSC might have had India as a permanent member much before China.
Thanks for Anti National Congress and moron Nehru.

 

[TaiShang]

So is China going to follow the bad Uncle SAM;s precedent and thinking of projecting by replacing a big bad boy (US) as another bad boy.
The biggest slap on the fact of existing bad boi (US) will be to abide by the court;s order and show to the world the respect you give to these institutes thus gaining more respect.
Just abiding by the courts verdict when it favors you and rejecting when if it against will not show you a great growing power.

No court can decide upon sovereignty. Otherwise we would have to take the entire pieces of India to the court.

SCS dispute is about sovereignty. After we sort that out, we can debate delimitation (EEZ) at the court, no problem. But delimitation cannot be debated at the point as VN and PH have been illegally occupying China's land.

 

[beijingwalker]

UNSC might have had India as a permanent member much before China.
Thanks for Anti National Congress and moron Nehru.

Where did you hear that? P5 were awarded to the victorious countries who fought and bled for the last victory over the axis, India was not even a country back then.

 

[Beast]

Duterte is seeking friendship with China In support of fresh financial aid to Pinoy infrastructure.

I heard he will over ride any ruling in non favour for China. So case close

 

[Zero_wing]

Man the chinese going mad over these they dug their own graves

 

[unbiasedopinion]

No court can decide upon sovereignty. Otherwise we would have to take the entire pieces of India to the court.

SCS dispute is about sovereignty. After we sort that out, we can debate delimitation (EEZ) at the court, no problem. But delimitation cannot be debated at the point as VN and PH have been illegally occupying China's land.

Problem with China is , they are still living in past. They need to come to present and accept the ground realities and move ahead.

 

[Jlaw]

Duterte is seeking friendship with China In support of fresh financial aid to Pinoy infrastructure.

I heard he will over ride any ruling in non favour for China. So case close

duerte has no choice. If he doesnt, so what. Is pillippines going to send rubber raft to oust out PLA navy? And PN will stand to lose out on business deals with China.