What's new

China's best friends

. . .
In its report on human rights in India during 2010, Human Rights Watch stated India had "significant human rights problems".[3] They identified lack of accountability for security forces and impunity for abusive policing including "police brutality, extrajudicial killings, and torture" as major problems. An independent United Nations expert in 2011 expressed concern that she found human rights workers and their families who "have been killed, tortured, ill-treated, disappeared, threatened, arbitrarily arrested and detained, falsely charged and under surveillance because of their legitimate work in upholding human rights and fundamental freedoms.[4]

Human rights in India - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
. . .
JayAtl is so angry these days. Channel your rage into something more productive. It sucks that UNHRC resolution was a such a diplomatic success for SL, but China wasn't the only country that supported it - in fact, no Asian country (other than India) did. Maybe that reflects more on the failings of Indian diplomacy to spread goodwill to its Asian neighbors?
 
.
Stalin-India

Ambassador accompanied by Counsellor interviewed Generalissimo Stalin today at 9 P.M. at KREMLIN. Vyshinsky was present at interview. Ambassador began by expressing hope that good relations between two countries would be strengthened to which Stalin assented. Ambassador affirmed India's anxiety to do everything possible to work for peace which was essential to enable her to build up country and improve living standards. India's policy of neutrality was real and positive and in Colombo Pandit Nehru had reaffirmed India's anxiety to avoid cold war tactics and anti-Communist pacts. Stalin said he did NOT hear about it, but seemed to approve. Ambassador spoke of essential need for big powers to do their utmost to put end to cold war and to place embargo on propaganda against each other, in which Generalissimo Stalin should take lead in larger interest of humanity. Stalin replied that did NOT depend upon him alone. Ambassador replied that Stalin should take initiative and thus help suffering humanity. Stalin said that two days ago he was informed that when Pandit Nehru was in London he wanted to return to India via MOSCOW but he was NOT sure MOSCOW would favour this trip* and enquired if Ambassador had heard about* this. Ambassador answered in negative, and added that he knew Pandit Nehru would be glad to visit MOSCOW if time and* opportunity permitted. Stalin asked several questions regarding India's position in Commonwealth and seemed anxious to know if she was more or less independent than, say, Canada. Ambassador explained position especially in light of India's forthcoming declaration as a Republic. Stalin asked if India was entitled to have her own army without any restriction and also if there is a navy, He NODDED approval when informed that was case; Commander-in-Chief was Indian and there was also an Indian Air Force. He enquired if relations with Pakistan were still bad and about language they spoke there. He was told that relations were rather strained as Pakistan was of the view that wherever there were Muslims they must be with them. Of the languages of India he enquired which was dominant and expressed satisfaction that Hindi was PHONETIC and NOT HIEROGLYPHIC as it would thus be easier to liquidate illiteracy, unlike position* in China where even to read a newspaper it needs five years study. He enquired* if the Government proposed to carry out agrarian reforms and added something has to be done as peasants are in very poor condition. Ambassador assured that landlordism was being abolished and and [sic] essential land reforms were being carried out. India had hard time to solve all problems in these two years when she had to clear up feudal RELICS and effects of partition. Stalin asked if Ceylon was separate State and whether its separation was so necessary and LAUGHED. He further enquired if court* language* had any AFFINITY with any Indian language and was informed of position. On parting he wished Ambassador good health.
Three Conversations of J.V. Stalin and Indian Ambassadors 1950-1950
 
. .
Rather than say China support all those leaders above one has to view from her perspectives.

China has been dominated by the west for more than a century and a half and her sufferings received no helps from outsiders because the west was too powerful and they controlled the news of their atrocities as well. Now as China has some say on international arenas, however small, she understands those leaders might be unfairly judged by the west or they are judged on the west's perspectives. So rather than taking sides she simply tells the west that they could wrong too in judging others.

Take Saddam Hussein as a hind sight, who can say now that he was not the best leader for Iraq at the time when he was deposed?
 
.
And you forgot the most important ones:

220px-Iraq,_Saddam_Hussein_(222).jpg


India was the best friend of his man to the point that Saddam traveled to India for declaring his support against Pakistan.
 
.
Gaddafi is a real man, his son is a ******* coward. He make his father believe that Lybia will be better off by surrendering to the west, what is the result? Really pathetic
 
. .
we don't have 1/3 of our country in rebellious turmoil and daily oppression by indian military. we don't have "HOUNOUR KILLINGS" nor " DOWRIES ATROCITIES" our women and kids can go out at night if they like. how about india?


Yes instead u have burning monks, hans dying like dogs in mines and kids being stabbed to death
 
.
Gaddafi is a real man, his son is a ******* coward. He make his father believe that Lybia will be better off by surrendering to the west, what is the result? Really pathetic

Qaddafi fought to death like a TRUE WARRIOR.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom