What's new

China ‘winning lion’s share’ of construction projects in Africa, study finds

Nan Yang

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 1, 2010
Messages
5,269
Reaction score
1
Country
Malaysia
Location
Malaysia

China ‘winning lion’s share’ of construction projects in Africa, study finds

  • US and European firms won 85 per cent of infrastructure contracts back in 1990, according to Hinrich Foundation report
  • But that has changed since Beijing made a strategic pivot to the continent and launched the Belt and Road Initiative
Jevans Nyabiage
Published: 4:00pm, 13 Aug, 2023
1691947968154.png

Chinese companies have built multibillion-dollar projects across Africa, from railways and bridges to hydroelectric dams. Photo: Xinhua

In the 1990s, about eight out of 10 contracts to build infrastructure in Africa were won by Western companies.

That started to change when China made an aggressive push into the continent, with a “going out” strategy that encouraged Chinese companies to venture overseas in search of markets and raw materials.

By 2013, when Xi Jinping became China’s president, Western firms were running 37 per cent of African infrastructure projects versus 12 per cent for Chinese companies, according to a new report by the Hinrich Foundation, an Asia-based philanthropic organisation.

Now, the tables have turned. Chinese companies accounted for 31 per cent of African infrastructure contracts valued at US$50 million or more in 2022, compared with 12 per cent for Western firms, the study on Africa’s growing clout in global trade and geopolitics found.

Chinese companies have built multibillion-dollar projects across the continent, including ports, railways, highways, bridges and hydroelectric dams – fuelled by Beijing’s vast Belt and Road Initiative.

“This is a big change from 1990, when US and European companies won 85 per cent of African construction contracts,” according to the study conducted by Keith Rockwell, a senior research fellow and former World Trade Organization director.

Rockwell said that under the belt and road strategy, launched in 2013, China had funded mega projects worth billions of dollars such as railways in Kenya and Ethiopia and ports in Djibouti and Nigeria.

In 10 years, engagement through the initiative has exceeded US$1 trillion globally, according to estimates by the Green Finance and Development Centre at Fudan University in Shanghai.

Rockwell noted that China is also Africa’s largest trading partner, with US$250 billion in trade in 2021 compared with US$62 billion in US-Africa trade.

The study found that Chinese infrastructure projects in sub-Saharan Africa totalled US$155 billion over the past two years, and that such investments had given Beijing leverage over African governments. By contrast, total US foreign direct investment in Africa came to US$44.8 billion in 2021.

“With such close trade and business relations it’s no surprise that China is winning the lion’s share of infrastructure project contracts,” Rockwell said.

Aly-Khan Satchu, a sub-Saharan Africa geoeconomic analyst, said China had been more innovative in its financing and was “significantly speedier” in making its strategic pivot to the continent.

“Of course, there have been nuances in this pivot. In the early stage Africa’s balance sheet was emerging from a restructuring and debt forgiveness and therefore there was a significant amount of space and China’s lending reflected this in its ‘aggressive’ initial phase,” Satchu said.

However, Rockwell noted that China is encountering some headwinds in its dealings with Africa. He said projects including a railway in Kenya and a traffic lighting project in Ghana had been controversial and had generated negative public reaction.

He said belt and road lending had fallen by 55 per cent from 2021 to 2022 to US$7.5 billion while overall lending fell from US$28.4 billion in 2016 to US$1.9 billion in 2020. “Some of this is due to the difficulty some African countries have faced in meeting their debt obligations,” Rockwell added.

Still, he said China’s relations with Africa were “broad and deep” and likely to remain strong for many years.

According to the study, China is clearly ahead in the great power competition for political and economic relationships in Africa. During the Donald Trump era, the US turned its back on Africa, while relations between Europe and its former African colonies have deteriorated, and China “rushed to fill the void”.

That includes the exploration and extraction of critical metals such as cobalt and lithium – essential raw materials for making the rechargeable batteries that power electric vehicles and solar panels.

The study noted that Chinese companies have stolen a march on their US and EU rivals in converting metals to raw materials for batteries. Chinese companies are now sourcing lithium from Zimbabwe and Namibia while the Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia are top sources for cobalt.

China’s share of global lithium refining capacity is 58 per cent and until similar facilities are operational in Europe, the US or Africa itself, China will be the main customer for Africa’s lithium, the study said, citing the International Energy Agency.

But it noted that Brussels and Washington are playing catch-up. To counter China’s belt and road scheme, the US and its Group of Seven partners last year pledged US$600 billion over five years to the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment. Africa is likely to be the principal recipient of these funds.

The US has pledged to fund construction of the Lobito corridor railway line to transport minerals from the DRC and Zambia to the port on Angola’s Atlantic coast.

The European Union in 2021 also unveiled the Global Gateway, which aims to mobilise up to €300 billion (US$330 billion) in investments between 2021 and 2027 to counter Chinese investments in developing countries, including in Africa.

Satchu said China had an “unassailable lead” in Africa, with significant “assets” on the ground after more than two decades of engagement.

“Both the US and Europe need to come to the party in the context of the battle for minerals, which will power the new economy,” he added.



Jevans Nyabiage

Jevans Nyabiage
Kenyan journalist Jevans Nyabiage is South China Morning Post's first Africa correspondent. Based in Nairobi, Jevans keeps an eye on China-Africa relations and also Chinese investments, ranging from infrastructure to energy and metal, on the continent.
 
.
In the 1990s, about eight out of 10 contracts to build infrastructure in Africa were won by Western companies.

So basically China was ignoring Africa...while the Westerners helped build their modern cities of today.
 
Last edited:
.
So basically China was ignoring Africa...while the Westerners helped build their modern cities of today.

In the past Africa has no choice. Has to accept Western humiliating lecture.
Today Africa has a better choice ... China :china: :china: :china:
 
. .
China should stop wasting resources and more or less forget about helping Africa to develop. China should focus more on developing internal poor regions of China such as small towns and rural areas and there are quite many places including some poor rural areas even in Central China too, let alone Tibet and Xinjiang.
 
.
China should stop wasting resources and more or less forget about helping Africa to develop. China should focus more on developing internal poor regions of China such as small towns and rural areas and there are quite many places including some poor rural areas even in Central China too, let alone Tibet and Xinjiang.
China make africa rich enough to buy all of china exports thats the end game
 
.
Can you be more shameless? keywords westerners to Africans, slavery, exploitation, genocide...

Oh you mean back in the days when China was a backwards country and the typical person was a farmer behind an oxen slogging it out in the rice fields and burn barrels were the norm?

I like how you hate it when I talk about old China and pull your typical sh*t of not talking about the past (since it strikes a nerve I guess)..but here you go being the typical Chinese hypocrite and talking about stuff from long long ago when it suits your particular convenience.

Colonialism in Africa ended long ago. Their modern cities were built by westerners not the Chinese. Sorry you aren't taking credit for that.
 
Last edited:
.
China make africa rich enough to buy all of china exports thats the end game
China is making these corrupted African nation leader rich. That's about it.

There is a reason why the world (not just the west but also UN and other Asian nation like Japan and SK) stop helping Africa since the 80s, it's that they are extremely corrupt and then they topple their government and refused to pay you back. That's Africa for you.

If you think OBOR generate a lot of bad debt over the last 10 years, wait 10 more on Africa and you will see what the term "Deadbeat" was really like.........
 
.
I like how you hate it when I talk about old China and pull your typical sh*t of not talking about the past (since it strikes a nerve I guess)..but here you go being the typical Chinese hypocrite and talking about stuff from long long ago.
I don't hate at all , it show we much we gained. keep talking about the past and history, old guy.
 
. . .
In the past Africa has no choice. Has to accept Western humiliating lecture.
Today Africa has a better choice ... China :china: :china: :china:

Why was that? Was China backwards and didn't have the know-how to help?

You are a crying bady here, the thread doesn't invite you in the first place.
threadreply.png

LOL! Don't reply to my thread replies if you can't handle my answer. I wasn't talking to you. Just shutup next time when you feel the urge to say something stupid.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom