What's new

China wants India to accept the new normal on LAC, move on to restore bilateral ties

52051

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 9, 2016
Messages
2,245
Reaction score
-11
Country
China
Location
China
While India wants China to restore status quo ante of April 2020, Beijing apparently feels that Modi government will come to terms with the new normal on LAC and revive ties in the coming months and willy-nilly accept the rise of the Middle Kingdom.

This month, External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar has made repeated public statements stating that the only way for restoring frozen India-China ties is to untangle the four friction points in East Ladakh by disengaging and de-escalating the military situation along the 1597 km Line of Actual Control (LAC).

The Chinese on their part are indicating that the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has established a new normal in East Ladakh by transgression and India should move to restoring bilateral ties by accepting the new LAC. Beijing wants India and China to celebrate 70 years of establishment of bilateral ties and move to restore economic ties. That boundary dispute should be kept separate and resolution parallel to growth in economic ties has been the Chinese narrative since the days of Deng Xiaoping.

While the previous Indian regimes believed that being soft to the PLA on border was a sure recipe for a peaceful and tranquil LAC, this was taken a sign of weakness by the Beijing rulers who time and again tried to change the unresolved line from Shaksgam Valley in Karakoram to Kibithu in far east Arunachal Pradesh. Even junior diplomats from China heckled India for referring to Tibet and Xinjiang or on Indian leaders travelling to Arunachal Pradesh. Buddhism teacher and 14th Dalai Lama was called a terrorist by China but Pakistani Masood Azhar, a terrorist who has spilled the blood of hundreds in India, was a religious-political activist as Beijing blocked his designation as global terrorist no less than four times.


According this indian author, so basically peace only if on China's term.
 
.
While India wants China to restore status quo ante of April 2020, Beijing apparently feels that Modi government will come to terms with the new normal on LAC and revive ties in the coming months and willy-nilly accept the rise of the Middle Kingdom.

This month, External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar has made repeated public statements stating that the only way for restoring frozen India-China ties is to untangle the four friction points in East Ladakh by disengaging and de-escalating the military situation along the 1597 km Line of Actual Control (LAC).

The Chinese on their part are indicating that the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has established a new normal in East Ladakh by transgression and India should move to restoring bilateral ties by accepting the new LAC. Beijing wants India and China to celebrate 70 years of establishment of bilateral ties and move to restore economic ties. That boundary dispute should be kept separate and resolution parallel to growth in economic ties has been the Chinese narrative since the days of Deng Xiaoping.

While the previous Indian regimes believed that being soft to the PLA on border was a sure recipe for a peaceful and tranquil LAC, this was taken a sign of weakness by the Beijing rulers who time and again tried to change the unresolved line from Shaksgam Valley in Karakoram to Kibithu in far east Arunachal Pradesh. Even junior diplomats from China heckled India for referring to Tibet and Xinjiang or on Indian leaders travelling to Arunachal Pradesh. Buddhism teacher and 14th Dalai Lama was called a terrorist by China but Pakistani Masood Azhar, a terrorist who has spilled the blood of hundreds in India, was a religious-political activist as Beijing blocked his designation as global terrorist no less than four times.


According this indian author, so basically peace only if on China's term.
They will have no option but to agree. But just to show to their citizens that they're tough they'll disagree at first. Sooner or later, they'll have to give in.
But keeping one thing in mind, they'll always be our enemy since they have gone arm in arm with the other COVID SUPER POWER.
It's a good thing China didn't solve the border issue. Always keep pressurizing them. Keep them spending more on defense than logistics/infrastructure.
 
.
Tough pill for India to swallow but definitely necessary ... it is a fait accompli. To be honest, India lost more in terms of territory and strategic objectives this year than in 1962. If they don't accept the Chinese demands, their fate will only worsen.
 
.
They will have no option but to agree. But just to show to their citizens that they're tough they'll disagree at first. Sooner or later, they'll have to give in.
But keeping one thing in mind, they'll always be our enemy since they have gone arm in arm with the other COVID SUPER POWER.
It's a good thing China didn't solve the border issue. Always keep pressurizing them. Keep them spending more on defense than logistics/infrastructure.
India trying to act like hard to get bitch but deep down she knows she wants it and accept it!

and then their will be a huge disInfo campaign by Bakhti media to show that their leader is a strongman and wont bow down after he has bowed down! crazy!
 
. . . .
We will get back our territories in time if not there will be no peace ..Both countries should be ready for mutual destruction in future war
If India doesn't accept it, there'll be no peace, even India accepts it, China can only guarantee peace for some time cause largely it is still an unresolved issue.
 
. .
We will get back our territories in time if not there will be no peace ..Both countries should be ready for mutual destruction in future war
I don't think India wants to be obliterated into ashes by a significantly stronger nuclear superpower. China may lose a couple of cities and suffer tens of millions dead, but all of India will be wiped out. Are you sure Aksai Chin and the 1000 square kilometers of territory you guys lost this summer is worth over 1 billion casualties? I didn't think so either.
 
.
If India doesn't accept it, there'll be no peace, even India accepts it, China can only guarantee peace for some time cause largely it is still an unresolved issue.
Even a terrorist organisation is enough to cause huge destruction in today's world and you think you live happily after destroying us ?
 
.
just one month before, many Indian guys are still cheering for "China agrees on disengagement". :bunny: :bunny:

 
. . .
I don't think India wants to be obliterated into ashes by a significantly stronger nuclear superpower. China may lose a couple of cities and suffer tens of millions dead, but all of India will be wiped out. Are you sure Aksai Chin and the 1000 square kilometers of territory you guys lost this summer is worth over 1 billion casualties? I didn't think so either.
Time will tell who will loose how much ..
 
.
Back
Top Bottom