China to hold grand Belt and Road Forum meet next week: Will India skip biggest diplomatic event of

[desiHindu]

Give India some power and they think they are the CEO

And China builds a few cities and the non-existent power goes to their head.
Better stick to the topic.

Bottom line, Chinese market has stagnated and their goods need new markets to sell to. They know it, you know it and each and every country knows it. Countries that have good relations with China will go to this meeting for optics.

India does not need to go because India knows this so called is a one way road, from China to other countries and nothing goes into China.

Japan & US attended. So what? If any chinese seriously think they will ever have normal relations with Japan or US, then they are seriously deluded. All three of you are competitors and have territorial issues.

 

[terranMarine]

And China builds a few cities and the non-existent power goes to their head.
Better stick to the topic.

Bottom line, Chinese market has stagnated and their goods need new markets to sell to. They know it, you know it and each and every country knows it. Countries that have good relations with China will go to this meeting for optics.

India does not need to go because India knows this so called is a one way road, from China to other countries and nothing goes into China.

Japan & US attended. So what? If any chinese seriously think they will ever have normal relations with Japan or US, then they are seriously deluded. All three of you are competitors and have territorial issues.

LOL what territorial issues does China have with US?

 

[ohmrlobalobayeh]

And China builds a few cities and the non-existent power goes to their head.
Better stick to the topic.

Bottom line, Chinese market has stagnated and their goods need new markets to sell to. They know it, you know it and each and every country knows it. Countries that have good relations with China will go to this meeting for optics.

India does not need to go because India knows this so called is a one way road, from China to other countries and nothing goes into China.

Japan & US attended. So what? If any chinese seriously think they will ever have normal relations with Japan or US, then they are seriously deluded. All three of you are competitors and have territorial issues.

Whatever it is- this is called narrow mindedness.

Despite their mutual wariness with several countries, including Vietnam and Japan- China has many times, extended an open hand to them in areas like trade and multiple international/regional cooperatives.

Indians are narrowminded and myopic(ironically, the Chinese are the 1s that are largely myopic- literally, including myself)people- they dont have the ability to think of the larger picture at hand. This is partly the reason why they've been subjugated and remain subservient time and again until the present day. History is a testament of this and this is why Bharat remains a poor, backward and superstitious nation today.

on trade being a 1 way street for China:

Once again, I see typical Indians blaming their own incompetency on the Chinese.

Except for raw materials, spices and maybe cow products- Bharat has nothing else to offer to China.

Give India some power and they think they are the CEO

Respect has to be earned and commanded- not demanded and boasted.

 

[帅的一匹]

A good decision on India's part. If India were to join OBOR- we wouldn't be gaining much, on the other hand - it would validate Pakistan's claim on the territories of Kashmir CPEC passes through.

You should go outside and take a sh!t in the open air to vent off your displeasure. It's a fact India keeps on importing Chinese goods, whether they are high or low quality depending on how much Indian companies are willing to pay India cannot refuse Chinese goods


I know our goods are like irresistible drugs, can't get enough of it.

I mean sometimes I have to buy Japanese product although I don't like them that much.

No doubt. They tried banning Chinese goods a few months ago and failed big time. They are addicted to our opium.

Cause they don't have s substitute.

Unless the government willing to subsidize the price difference.

 

[StraightShooter]

Whatever it is- this is called narrow mindedness.

Despite their mutual wariness with several countries, including Vietnam and Japan. China has many times, extended an open hand to them in areas like trade and multiple international/regional cooperatives.

Indians are narrowminded and myopic(ironically, the Chinese are the 1s that are largely myopic- literally, including myself)people- they dont have the ability to think of the larger picture at hand. This is partly the reason why they've been subjugated and remain subservient time and again until the present day.

Let me ask you a question.

If India gets into an agreement with Dalai Lama on Tibet bypassing Chinese, What would be China's reaction?

There are red lines for each country. For India, Indian sovereignty on the entire region of Jammu & Kashmir is non-negotiable.

It does not matter if other countries attend/participate in OBOR or not.

As long as OBOR passes through Pakistan held Kashmir (which India claims as its territory) without an agreement with India, India would never join this initiative.

Chinese have clearly crossed the Indian red line here as power has gone into their heads.

Indo-Chinese ties would go down rapidly with such Chinese behavior.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

If India gets into an agreement with Dalai Lama on Tibet bypassing Chinese, What would be China's reaction?

Didn't India already do that by hosting a Tibetan Government in Exile on Indian soil in 1959?

 

[ohmrlobalobayeh]

Let me ask you a question.

If India gets into an agreement with Dalai Lama on Tibet bypassing Chinese, What would be China's reaction?

There are red lines for each country. For India, Indian sovereignty on the entire region of Jammu & Kashmir is non-negotiable.

It does not matter if other countries attend/participate in OBOR or not.

As long as OBOR passes through Pakistan held Kashmir (which India claims as its territory) without an agreement with India, India would never join this initiative.

Chinese have clearly crossed the Indian red line here as power has gone into their heads.

Indo-Chinese ties would go down rapidly with such Chinese behavior.

The situation would remain the same in areas of trade, commerce and infrastructure, not to mention Tibet is de facto already in PRC anyway<==lolz.

Bharat is like the petty ex-girlfriend that wouldnt talk to her ex-boyfriend classmate during group projects in class

 

[terranMarine]

I mean sometimes I have to buy Japanese product although I don't like them that much

Well there's nothing wrong with Japanese products generally speaking just expensive most of the time. Just as there's nothing wrong with quality products from China (though almost everything is Made in China these days). As the global factory Chinese factories serves all sorts of layers of customers. They want cheap? Sure quality not so good and could be unreliable. They pay medium to high price China can make fantastic products. Thing is India cannot ban importing Chinese products where else would they find substitutes?

 

[T-123456]

Right decision!

Explain why it is the right decision cause its only economic ?

 

[StraightShooter]

Didn't India already do that by hosting a Tibetan Government in Exile on Indian soil in 1959?

No. Allowing refugees is different than getting into political agreements.

India does not allow any political political activities related to Tibet from its soil.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

No. Allowing refugees is different than getting into political agreements.

India does not allow any political political activities related to Tibet from its soil.

Setting up a "Government in Exile" is a direct challenge to China's authority over Tibet, that's pretty different from allowing refugees. If India had just allowed refugees that would have been a different story.

 

[StraightShooter]

The situation would remain the same in areas of trade, commerce and infrastructure, not to mention Tibet is de facto already in PRC anyway<==lolz.

Bharat is like the petty ex-girlfriend that wouldnt talk to her ex-boyfriend classmate in class

As I said in my previous post, power has got into the heads of the Chinese.

India would reserve the right and would respond with all the means at its disposal when the time is right for India.

 

[ohmrlobalobayeh]

As I said in my previous post, power has got into the heads of the Chinese.

India would reserve the right and would respond with all the means at its disposal when the time is right for India.

I like your future tense-laden rhetoric- typical of Indian speech

 

[StraightShooter]

Setting up a "Government in Exile" is a direct challenge to China's authority over Tibet, that's pretty different from allowing refugees. If India had just allowed refugees that would have been a different story.

Well then you should read some history.

Original India supported the cause of Tibet hence the Sino-Indian war of 1962 but since India and China restored ambassadorial relations in 1976, India has gone more than half way to extend the hand of reconciliation to resolve the problems. Later, India & China agreed to open the trade route between Tibet Autonomous Region and Sikkim as a path to recognize the borders and sovereignty claims by both the countries.

Government of India does not recognize or participate in any such Tibet related activities.

Can you give me a single agreement that Government of India got into with the Tibetans on either side of the border that compromised Chinese position on Tibet.

 

[帅的一匹]

Setting up a "Government in Exile" is a direct challenge to China's authority over Tibet, that's pretty different from allowing refugees. If India had just allowed refugees that would have been a different story.

Now they pretend to be innocent, but for me it's a Hypocracy. Government in exile=refugees

Maybe we can host some Maoist refugees to China as well.