What's new

China the second country in the world to develop hit-to-kill, exoatmospheric BMD

Han Patriot

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Mar 23, 2011
Messages
13,535
Reaction score
-36
Country
China
Location
Singapore
On February 5, China used a long-range missile interceptor, tentatively identified as the DN-3, to destroy a target missile in space. This isn't the first time the nation has managed it; in 2010, China used a midcourse interceptor, likely another DN-3, to destroy a target missile in the exoatmosphere, or roughly 62 miles above the earth's surface. That 2010 test made China the second country in the world, after the United States, to develop hit-to-kill, exoatmospheric missile defense capability.

chinese_kkv.jpg

KINETIC KILL VEHICLE

The upper stage of the DN-3, shown here in a CCTV broadcast of Xi Jingping's visit to a research lab in 2011, includes the rocket motor stage and the shrouded interceptor, which maneuvers itself into the path of the incoming missile. Note the dark apertures on the rim of the nosecone. Those are electro-optical and infrared sensors for guiding the upper stage in the stratosphere and into space.

CCTV


Compared to boost-phase and terminal missile defenses, exoatmospheric ballistic missile defense (BMD) is the most difficult of all missile defense mission sets. It requires launching a hypersonic missile interceptor to shoot down another hypersonic missile in space. Hit-to-kill interceptions, such as those performed by the DN-3 and the American SM-3, are even more technically demanding. They require the interceptor vehicle to precisely smash into the incoming warhead in order to destroy the missile with force of impact alone. It's such a difficult task that early BMD missiles like the LIM-49 Spartan used a nuclear warhead to overcome fire-control issues.

kt_asat_abm_missiles.jpg

ONE AND THE ALMOST SAME

Shown in this CGI drawing are two exoatmospheric missiles: anti-satellite (left) and anti-ballistic (right).

Planeman 2009


While the system is reportedly based nf the solid-fueled DF-21 medium-range ballistic missile, the DN-3's rocket motor is believed to be similar to that of the SC-19 anti-satellite (ASAT) missile. That should come as little surprise, as midcourse anti-ballistic and anti-satellite technologies have much in common. They both need to strike high-velocity targets precisely in the vacuum of space.

china_strategic_warning_radar.jpg

CHINA STRATEGIC RADAR

This massive electronically scanned radar—which measures up to 100 feet in diameter by some estimates) has enough power to track high-orbit satellites and and long-range missiles.



The timing of the test is notable. It occurs amid ongoing Korean Peninsula tensions and recent test flights of India's Agni V intercontinental ballistic missile, as well as the release of the 2018 U.S. Nuclear Posture Review. China's pursuit of state-of-the-art BMD technology reflects renewed competition as well as a larger pattern in development of high-tech, high-speed weapons like railguns, hypersonic glide vehicles, and scramjet engines.

https://www.popsci.com/china-space-missile-test#page-2
 
On February 5, China used a long-range missile interceptor, tentatively identified as the DN-3, to destroy a target missile in space. This isn't the first time the nation has managed it; in 2010, China used a midcourse interceptor, likely another DN-3, to destroy a target missile in the exoatmosphere, or roughly 62 miles above the earth's surface. That 2010 test made China the second country in the world, after the United States, to develop hit-to-kill, exoatmospheric missile defense capability.

chinese_kkv.jpg

KINETIC KILL VEHICLE

The upper stage of the DN-3, shown here in a CCTV broadcast of Xi Jingping's visit to a research lab in 2011, includes the rocket motor stage and the shrouded interceptor, which maneuvers itself into the path of the incoming missile. Note the dark apertures on the rim of the nosecone. Those are electro-optical and infrared sensors for guiding the upper stage in the stratosphere and into space.

CCTV


Compared to boost-phase and terminal missile defenses, exoatmospheric ballistic missile defense (BMD) is the most difficult of all missile defense mission sets. It requires launching a hypersonic missile interceptor to shoot down another hypersonic missile in space. Hit-to-kill interceptions, such as those performed by the DN-3 and the American SM-3, are even more technically demanding. They require the interceptor vehicle to precisely smash into the incoming warhead in order to destroy the missile with force of impact alone. It's such a difficult task that early BMD missiles like the LIM-49 Spartan used a nuclear warhead to overcome fire-control issues.

kt_asat_abm_missiles.jpg

ONE AND THE ALMOST SAME

Shown in this CGI drawing are two exoatmospheric missiles: anti-satellite (left) and anti-ballistic (right).

Planeman 2009


While the system is reportedly based nf the solid-fueled DF-21 medium-range ballistic missile, the DN-3's rocket motor is believed to be similar to that of the SC-19 anti-satellite (ASAT) missile. That should come as little surprise, as midcourse anti-ballistic and anti-satellite technologies have much in common. They both need to strike high-velocity targets precisely in the vacuum of space.

china_strategic_warning_radar.jpg

CHINA STRATEGIC RADAR

This massive electronically scanned radar—which measures up to 100 feet in diameter by some estimates) has enough power to track high-orbit satellites and and long-range missiles.



The timing of the test is notable. It occurs amid ongoing Korean Peninsula tensions and recent test flights of India's Agni V intercontinental ballistic missile, as well as the release of the 2018 U.S. Nuclear Posture Review. China's pursuit of state-of-the-art BMD technology reflects renewed competition as well as a larger pattern in development of high-tech, high-speed weapons like railguns, hypersonic glide vehicles, and scramjet engines.

https://www.popsci.com/china-space-missile-test#page-2

Really cool...Go China Go

:pakistan::china:
 
They don’t even know what is mid course interception. :enjoy:

At current stage, mid-course NMD is a just good filter to screen out nuclear pretenders and their tiny little nuclear "threat" to real ones.

In the future, China need to develop our own version of Star Wars system, or in a culture-sensitive way: Great Wall system, unlike Regan's era, the tech are already there in China, be it laser, be it high power microwave, be it rail gun, be it KKV, be it EM launching rockets, we can make it real, it maybe China's Apolo project and definitely be far more benefitial and productive than Apollo who only get worthless bragging right as an end product:enjoy:
 
At current stage, mid-course NMD is a just good filter to screen out nuclear pretenders and their tiny little nuclear "threat" to real ones.

In the future, China need to develop our own version of Star Wars system, or in a culture-sensitive way: Great Wall system, unlike Regan's era, the tech are already there in China, be it laser, be it high power microwave, be it rail gun, be it KKV, be it EM launching rockets, we can make it real, it maybe China's Apolo project and definitely be far more benefitial and productive than Apollo who only get worthless bragging right as an end product:enjoy:
Agreed. In actual fact, this missile shield is more productive and important than moon landing. That's just for prestige.
 
Has it been testing against MIRV warheads with target decoys? That's the holy grail of any credible missile defence system.
 

Back
Top Bottom