What's new

China: The rise of a trade titan

Yes, for over two decades China central government has sent waves of officials to Singapore for training & development, touted as "Chinese Mayor Programme", by now at least 30,000 senior officials have been trained and serving as backbone across all public sectors in China.

This is perhaps the least reported major event in western media, of course.

中国市长班_百度百科 (baidu.com)

Tiny Singapore is just a catalyst for continental China to reform and integrate into the global economy.

In February 1992, Mr Deng's reform agenda was being opposed by conservative elements in the party's leadership. In order to counter them, he took his family on a tour of South China. In Shenzhen, he said that Guangdong province should catch up with the four tiger economies in 20 years. He went on to say: "There is good social order in Singapore. They govern the place with discipline. We should draw from their experience and do even better than them."

Mr Deng's endorsement of Singapore led to a flood of requests from China. In 1992 alone, Singapore hosted the visit of more than 500 delegations from China.

A second contribution which Singapore has made to China is the transfer of knowledge, expertise and experience. Singapore's pioneer finance minister, Dr Goh Keng Swee, served as China's economic adviser. Dr Goh did for China what the Dutch expert, Dr Albert Winsemius, had done for Singapore.

Singapore has been extremely generous in sharing its experience with Chinese leaders and cadres. Both the Nanyang Technological University and the National University of Singapore have customised special Chinese language courses for Chinese officials. The Civil Service College Singapore has also collaborated with China's Central Party School in education and training. In his speech at Nankai University, in 2015, President Tony Tan Keng Yam said that in total, Singapore has provided training to 50,000 Chinese officials and cadres (including Xi).

This contribution is unique and priceless. Speaking at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy on April 17, 2010, China's Vice-President Li Yuanchao said: "Out of all the destinations where we send our leading officials to receive training, Singapore is our top choice because Singapore is the most sincere in helping China develop, due to our longstanding warm relationship."
STEADFAST FRIEND

A fourth contribution which Singapore has made to China is to be its steadfast friend and to be an interlocutor between China and the US.

Following the tragic Tiananmen incident in 1989, the West condemned China and imposed economic sanctions against it. Singapore did not join the West but continued to invest in China and help China. When negotiations between China and the US on China's accession to the World Trade Organisation reached an impasse, Mr Lee spoke to two members of President Bill Clinton's Cabinet and helped to break the impasse.
Singapore’s relationship with China is special not only because Mr Lee (and Singapore) have contributed to China’s modernisation, but also because he (and Singapore) have helped the world, particularly the West, and China to understand each other.

No leader appears to be as candid as Mr Lee; he often reminded China how to integrate itself into the world. At times, his comments ruffled feathers, particularly among the younger generation of Chinese. But China’s leaders understand that Mr Lee’s comments were in its interest.

In the same way, Mr Lee helped the West to understand China. Since Deng, the West has frequently dismissed China’s growth and its sustainability. Mr Lee would tell the Americans and Europeans that China’s growth was indeed real. He often cautioned the US against underestimating China and trying to contain this rising power. Because of his innate understanding of China, Mr Lee’s views were sought and closely listened to by other world leaders.

Former US Secretary of State George Shultz once said: “He (Mr Lee) didn’t just go see leaders in Beijing. He was able to travel in the country and see people in all sorts of occupations and age levels, so he is a very penetrating observer ... I found that very valuable to listen to what he had to say, as we tried to formulate in the US how we would approach China.”

Today, China is an important player on the world stage and its leaders can talk directly to other world leaders everywhere. But Chinese leaders continue to appreciate Singapore’s view on the world. As then Vice-President Xi Jinping told Mr Lee during the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games: “We will need you for a long time. I have been to Singapore, I know what you have and our people want to learn. We get more from you than from America.”
 
.
Tiny Singapore is just a catalyst for continental China to reform and integrate into the global economy.
Yes tiny Singapore has deeply impressed and influenced top leaders in big China, that's why the decades-long "Learn from Singapore" & "Chinese Mayor Programme" is driven by the CCP power center (中组部, Organization Department of the CCP Central Committee). It's a top national strategy to develop thousands of Singapore-trained senior officials.

Economically speaking, investment and tech transfers from JP/SK/HK/TW have no lesser influence on China than SG, especially in private sector manufacturing, R&D, exports, industrial upgrade, but the public sector is heavily influenced by SG model. From a state perspective, China is becoming a giant version of Singapore.

That's why it is among the least talked-about topics in western media or intellectual circles.
 
.
You're being kind.

LKY:
人们听到赞美时通常有三种不同的反应:第一种是陶醉于温馨的溢美之词,忘记了关节的疼痛和自疑的伤感。第二种是处之泰然,因为自己已有无数荣耀,后来的只是锦上添花。第三种是苛刻地自我反省,并有点难为情,明知别人是刻意掩饰我们的缺点并凸显我们的优点。我的反应难免是第三种,因为我很了解我自己,知道那些赞语是别人的过奖。(在伦敦接受荣誉市民荣衔时谈话1982年7月15日)

Yes, we're lucky to have LKY, especially when most of his generation are illiterate in those times. Sometimes reading or watching his old speeches still give me insights today.

IMO his greatest legacy for SG is to institutionalize his ideals and put in constitutional safeguards to minimize a one man one vote system from going astray. It's not easy for populists to get and stay in power without showing competence, and even if they can get into power there's a separately elected President whose approval is required to appoint key positions and access to our reserves.
Otherwise populists can easily can get into power by promising the sky, and within two generations the money will all be spent and we will be heavily in debt.

I just watched the videos, 4 in total. Good documentary, but questioners are immature. LKY is a great man, but has to respond to silly questions.

Immature questions brought awesome answers from LKY, it's very educational to all people.

I think China is not suitable to bring in Singapore alike political system, not right now, but worth keeping an eye on the evolvement.
 
Last edited:
.
China should not be focusing on export as source of growth. Internal consumption has been weak for the past 6 months, and we have a population decline problem on hand.

We need to focus on income inequality, national housing strategy, public healthcare and senior care. These are make or break points for China. All the goods produced by robots won't do us any good if there are no one to spend money on it.
 
.
I just watched the videos, 4 in total. Good documentary, but questioners are immature. LKY is a great man, but has to respond to silly questions.

Immature questions brought awesome answers from LKY, it's very educational to all people.

I think China is not suitable to bring in Singapore alike political system, not right now, but worth keeping an eye on the evolvement.

The youth are always more idealistic lol. Looking back, I was also more idealistic in my teens than in my twenties today.

I think the video below is more educational, at least he's not getting cut off. LKY was speaking to undergraduates and giving his detailed thoughts on passing the baton to Goh Chok Tong who is more consultative and less paternalistic than him. Singapore was also transitioning to a developed economy at that time and there are different societal aspirations to meet.

 
.
Tiny Singapore is just a catalyst for continental China to reform and integrate into the global economy.
My 2 cents.
It was chairman Mao who set the stage in 1971, not Deng Xiaoping in 1979. Deng Xiaoping fully took advantage of the opportunities created by Mao.
And yes, Singapore is catalyst, while China is 300 larger. The mainstream media will have to recognize Singapore model one day when China fully rejuvenate.
The youth are always more idealistic lol. Looking back, I was also more idealistic in my teens than in my twenties today.

I think the video below is more educational, at least he's not getting cut off. LKY was speaking to undergraduates and giving his detailed thoughts on passing the baton to Goh Chok Tong who is more consultative and less paternalistic than him.

I downloaded all LKY videos years back, I should go through them. Thanks man.
The youth are always more idealistic lol. Looking back, I was also more idealistic in my teens than in my twenties today.

I think the video below is more educational, at least he's not getting cut off. LKY was speaking to undergraduates and giving his detailed thoughts on passing the baton to Goh Chok Tong who is more consultative and less paternalistic than him.

I was naive back in my 20s, embarrassing. At least those boys and girls are smarter than me when I was at their age.
 
Last edited:
.
China's 20 years battle of taking over
微信图片_20220127171704.png
 
.
Yes tiny Singapore has deeply impressed and influenced top leaders in big China, that's why the decades-long "Learn from Singapore" & "Chinese Mayor Programme" is driven by the CCP power center (中组部, Organization Department of the CCP Central Committee). It's a top national strategy to develop thousands of Singapore-trained senior officials.

Economically speaking, investment and tech transfers from JP/SK/HK/TW have no lesser influence on China than SG, especially in private sector manufacturing, R&D, exports, industrial upgrade, but the public sector is heavily influenced by SG model. From a state perspective, China is becoming a giant version of Singapore.

That's why it is among the least talked-about topics in western media or intellectual circles.

The greatest impact on China had been the financial practices from Hong Kong, the manufacturing processes from Taiwan and the investments from both. You cannot underestimate the advantages of language and cultural affinity in getting things working.

Governance practices from Singapore enhanced the above as they were more ideas and investment from yet another Chinese diaspora.

Investment and techniques from Japan and South Korea would rank after that.

The closer in culture, the more easily things were accepted and implemented.

The West thought it was their ideas and their investment. lol
 
.
Singapore's influence on China is beyond doubt. Lee Kuan Yew is a great man.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom