What's new

China Science & Technology Forum

actually you still always funny
troll

then tell me how this part "printed", if you think that's a different way.
I means the "printer" used powder metallurgy tech to "print" this part.

Although sharing the same name 3D printing, printers of each part would use suitable tech to "print" out : plastic injection, powder metallurgy,

this is one of 3D printer using a very simple tech

Decorating-Cake-Pops-1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Two Chinese firms among potential bidders for STATS ChipPac :enjoy:

SINGAPORE Wed Aug 27, 2014 9:15pm EDT

(Reuters) - Two Chinese firms are among companies which have approached STATS ChipPAC Ltd about acquiring it, the Singapore provider of technology services said on Thursday.

STATS ChipPAC, which has a market value of $1.2 billion and is majority owned by state investor Temasek Holdings [TEM.UL], identified Jiangsu Changjiang Electronics Technology Co and Tianshui Huatian Technology Co as possible bidders.

The Singapore company, which provides semiconductor packaging design and assembly solutions, had said in May that it had received approaches by some companies but had not identified them.

"The company wishes to confirm that these parties include JCET and Huatian. There is no assurance that any of these approaches will result in any definitive agreement or transaction," it said in a statement on Thursday.

The Chinese companies, which were first named by Bloomberg news on Wednesday, each have a market capitalisation that is only slightly bigger than STATS ChipPAC.

STATS ChipPac's shares shot up 12 percent higher on Wednesday and were flat on Thursday. The stock has doubled this year on the view that it was a takeover target for Taiwanese or Chinese firms.

Moody's Investors Service cut its ratings for the company this month, citing its debt load as well as slowing growth in the high-end communications segment and muted demand from the personal computer and consumer-end markets. It noted that revenues have been on a declining trend since 2011.

STATS ChipPAC's corporate family rating and senior unsecured debt rating was cut to Ba2 from Ba1.

Temasek in early 2007 made a bid of up to $1.6 billion for the 64.4 percent of STATS ChipPAC it did not own, but it was unable to hit the 90 percent mark which would have allowed a delisting. It currently owns 83.8 percent of Stats ChipPAC, according to Thomson Reuters data.

Two Chinese firms among potential bidders for STATS ChipPac| Reuters
 
China's eyes in the sky point to space exploration's future :coffee::lol:

2014-09-03 12:33

China Daily Web Editor: Wang Fan


Just after China put its second high-definition Gaofen satellite into orbit on Aug 19, the China National Space Administration (CNSA) said that police had used the database of the first Gaofen, operational now since December, to discover illegal border crossings from Democratic People's Republic of Korea, poppy plantations in Inner Mongolia autonomous region, marijuana farms in Jilin province and a tanker smuggling oil off the coast of Fujian province, according to reports in China Daily.

China's Ministry of Public Security the same day announced that they were unclear about the release and use of data from CNSA, the paper also reported.

Ostensibly, of course, satellites are put into space for things like geographic and natural resource surveys, climate-change monitoring, city planning and disaster relief. But in the era of Big Data, who can resist taking a peek, especially when the pictures are so breathtaking and detailed.

"They're sending down good images, there's no doubt about that," said space historian and author Bob Zimmerman, who runs the website behindtheblack.com.

"These are earth resource satellites to look at the earth at high-resolution for doing things like agriculture and geology research and climate research," Zimmerman said. "They are comparable to the American Landsats, though of course modern."

Zimmerman called them "very highly sophisticated, well-designed ground resource satellites".

"It's remote sensing so it has high-resolution, so any data it gets will be used for both military and civilian - no different from the United States, in a sense - but it's not a purely civilian craft. It has both purposes at the same time," Zimmerman said.

China plans to launch another three Gaofens before the end of 2015, each with different purposes, with a sixth going up in 2016 and a seventh in 2018.

"NASA has a public relations thing they've been calling the A-Train," Zimmerman said. "That's a series of climate earth-resource satellites they're launching to look at the Earth at a variety of different wave lengths and resolutions to study the climate and the Earth's environment. It seems to me that's what this Gaofen program is."

As for China's overall space program, Zimmerman called it "a robust manned space program with very high ambitions". He said it was "a literal copy of the kind of space program that the Soviet Union had in the '60s", in which the government's purposes are public relations and developing the industrial base".

The big difference, of course, is that China does not have the high-stakes Cold War competition that was pressuring both the Soviets and the US to go fast. "Therefore they're going extremely slow," he said, recalling that China's first manned flight was in 2003 and in the 11 years since have done only four more.

"So you're talking about one every two to three years," Zimmerman said. "A very slow pace, but very deliberate and well-thought out."

Zimmerman believes China's future plans are to build and assemble a Mir-type space station in orbit, again modeled after what the Russians did in the '60s and '70s. Their prototype space station modules now are comparable to the early Salyut Russian stations "to get the feel of how to do something like this and then assemble a much larger station comparable to Mir", he said.

"Again, just like the Russians they are very clear on what the goal of the space station program is: it's learning how to build interplanetary spaceships that can travel to other planets," Zimmerman said. "That's what Mir was designed around and that's what the Chinese are doing. It's very clear they have this focus."

Zimmerman, who has written a book on why space stations are built, said, "It's not a laboratory in space. If you're doing it now, and putting people on it for a long period of time, you're learning the engineering and medical research necessary to build a vessel that will take people to other planets."

"It's a serious program that is going to happen, but once again the pace is going to be very slow," he said.

As for the future of orbital satellites, Zimmerman said the cutting-edge technology now is CubeSats, NASA's "nano-satellites" that are about 4-inches square and weigh about 3 pounds.

"The effort to shrink the size of satellites so you don't need as big a launcher to put them up or you can put significantly more capability on them because things have been miniaturized. That in the next five years is going to revolutionize the entire satellite industry, communications especially."

According to NASA's website, three CubeSats were piggybacked in the rocket that launched the first Gaofen, putting in orbit the mini-gadgets for Peru, Turkey and Argentina.

Another component has to do with the launch industry, which going through a significant revolution right now with competition from new companies. "That is a challenge for China, because they've had the lowest-cost launcher with the Long March family and because of US State Department regulations, it's difficult for American companies to use Chinese rockets. But they were still the cheapest company on Earth, and that's not the case anymore. They're under significant competition from Space X."

What comes from the completion? It's"fueling innovation that we haven't seen in decades", said Zimmerman, whose most recent book Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8 is now available in ebook format.

China's eyes in the sky point to space exploration's future - Headlines, features, photo and videos from ecns.cn|china|news|chinanews|ecns|cns
 
Chinese scientists build thought-powered arm
cntv

Chinese scientists from Zhejiang University have successfully built a bionic arm which can be powered by thought. The achievement is seen as a significant breakthrough for patients without limbs or who are paralyzed.

2014090313321895766.jpg


The achievement is seen as a significant breakthrough for patients without limbs or who are paralyzed.

The bionic hand can perform the gestures for “rock, paper, and scissor”... all controlled by human thought.

The 28-year-old patient who tested the robotic arm was implanted with a brain electrode.

"When she wants to play "rock, paper, scissor", the electrode can interpret her brainwaves and control the robotic hand. The accuracy of gestures can reach 80%," Snd Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Univ. brain surgeon Zhu Junming said.

The implant was initially used to diagnose the patient’s epilepsy.

The research later became a way to overcome the challenges posed by the disorder.

"When the patient makes a gesture, the electrode will send signals. We use computers to model and analyze the signals," Brain-Machine Interface Project, Zhejiang Univ. Head, Zheng Xiaoxiang said.

The team started its research in 2006 and made its first breakthrough in 2012.

A monkey could successfully control a bionic arm to pinch or grasp.

Now that technology is being applied in clinical medicine to rebuild human motor functions.

"The outcome of this research will be used on paralyzed patients suffering from Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, or high paraplegia caused by spin injury. Motor functions can be rebuilt using the bionic arm. It will help patients live and work," 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Univ., Chief brain surgeon Zhang Jiahua said.

The success of the latest experiment shows China’s progress in the field. But researchers say they still need to develop higher-end technology before more progress can be made.
 
gdp per capita 35k vs 8k, know the difference, china is cheaper than you to buy technology

japan and korea even have no technology in comparison to china

I'm not debating the cost differences, I'm simply correcting your false assumption that we haven't come up with this technology. In fact, we developed this even before the Chinese did. :)
 
no you didnt your article is from 2014

The article was published this summer, however, research on this goes back several years.

The point of my rebuttal is to contest your claim that we lacked this technology, which is a gross lie on your part.

I will counsel you to do research before you post something here, that's all.


Kind Regards,
@Nihonjin1051
 
Back
Top Bottom